Story Comments
Posted by: mesodude 1 year, 6 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

mesodude1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"That being said, I think it should be made very clear to Iran that a nuclear strike by them or any of their terror network partners would mean the destruction of their entire nation."
--I don't understand this argument. Israel is armed to the teeth and we've set up camp in Iraq for the last 5 years.
Reply-

Dionys1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think s/he's trying to argue that Iran doesn't already realize that any attack on Israel would be met by atomic weapons from Israel. Which seems kind of silly seeing as how Israel made plans a few years back to make pre-emptive tactical *nuclear* strikes in Iran and word got out. Somehow I don't think Iran's missing that point.
Then again if we look at the history of aggressive invasions on a large scale and the seizing of territory (imperialism), Israel and the US seem to be in the lead.
Reply-

Mutainia1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Didn't old Amadinnerjacket say he was willing to sacrifice most of Iran to eliminate Israel off the map? By the way, O "I'm not a Muslim", you say "if we look at the history of invasions on a large scale and the seizing of territory (imperialism) Israel and the US seem to be in the lead." Oh really? Give some examples, or, I'll think you are taqqiyaing. Israel was attacked, it took the territory it was attacked from, but, it's returned a lot of it, and, got missiles and rockets fired into it's neighborhoods FROM territory it traded for peace (Gaza).
Reply-
-
-
-

Mutainia1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I wish I could believe Dionys, hyper, muhairi (where ever he now is), Daylight, etc., etc., but, they follow a book that says they are cut off from Allah if they are friends of Christians and Jews and can only ACT like they are friend of Christians and Jews (see Quran 3:28), which makes EVERYthing they say hard to be trusted. SORRY, O Jihadists of the Pen, the problem doesn't point to you, it points to that satanically evil book that you follow, the Qu'ran.
Reply-

Dionys1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Christians and Jews and can only ACT like they are friend of Christians and Jews (see Quran 3:28), which makes EVERYthing they say hard to be trusted. SORRY, O Jihadists of the Pen, the problem doesn't point to you, it points to that satanically evil book that you follow, the Qu'ran."
Please do read Qur'an Surah 3:28 so that you can see for yourself it doesn't say anything Mutainia claims. When you read it, it will be apparent that she has never read it but depends on the hateful, ignorant words of some anti-Muslim preacher.
As for what book I follow, it's certainly not the Qur'an. But then the Qur'an isn't a satanically evil book, either, so who knows what you're referring to.
Reply-

Mutainia1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Please do read Qur'an Surah 3:28 so that you can see for yourself it doesn't say anything Mutainia claims. When you read it, it will be apparent that she has never read it but depends on the hateful, ignorant words of some anti-Muslim preacher."
Mutainia: Anti-Islam NOT anti-Muslim, folks. His name is "investigateislam", and, I posted this video in my response to wasntme when he lied about saying he tried to engage me many times in debate. IF interested, you can click on it there, or, go to by submissions and see it there.
"As for what book I follow, it's certainly not the Qur'an. But then the Qur'an isn't a satanically evil book, either, so who knows what you're referring to." HOW come you feel it's not a satanically evil book when it has 9:1-5 in it ALONG with 3:28 and 16:106?
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

BB641 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Armed to the teeth compared to whom? They are equipped to handle themselves very well for a defensive war but I don't think they have the capabilities for a sustained offensive war against Islam. Even to strike Iran's nuke plants would be a major stretch for their air force. They have sub with some sort of cruise missiles but again I don't think they have the resources to maintain a long campaign. Would the USA support Israel's strikes on Iran, right now, probably. After the next election, probably not. With an Obama presidency, I really see uncertainty for Israel and Iraq.
Reply
-
People Who Liked This Comment (5)
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.