« Back to story "Obama Staffer's Lobbying Work Runs Counter to Candidate's Guidelines"

Story Comments

Posted by: Nixie 1 year, 7 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    Nixie1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    "The co-director of Barack Obama's presidential campaign in Puerto Rico is a Washington-based federal lobbyist for the government of Puerto Rico.

    Ethics watchdogs said that Francisco J. Pavía's high-profile role appears to contradict the Obama campaign's ethics guidelines, which forbid federal lobbyists from working on staff. But Obama spokesman Bill Burton said Pavía is an "active volunteer" -- not a paid staffer -- and can hold the job without running afoul of the campaign's rules."

    So it's okay, as long as they aren't "paid"...uh huh.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    52 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      DoseASpinoza1 year, 7 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Well considering 13 of McCain's present paid staffers are lobbyists even after five have left the campaign, I'd say yes, I could forgive Obama for one volunteer.

      Katherine Harris was the chair of Bush's campaign in Florida and then was in charge of which ballots got counted. That didn't seem to bother the neocons.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      7 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        From The Article:

        "Pavía has been a registered lobbyist for various arms of the Puerto Rican government since 2001."

        Indeed, this "gotcha" story appears to be more concerned with the letter of the law rather than with the spirit of the law. It's one thing to hire a lobbyist who represents the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which seems relatively benign; it's quite another to hire lobbyists that represent multinational corporations seeking multi-billion dollar contracts from the U.S. government, which presents a much more dangerous conflict of interest.

        While there has been public backlash against lobbyists representing corporate interests (i.e., Haliburton, Enron, Blackwater) and interests of foreign countries (i.e. Saudi Arabia), is there anyone genuinely worried about the undue influence of Puerto Rico on U.S. policy?

        Oh no! The Puerto Ricans are coming to get us! Honestly, I didn't even know Puerto Rico had lobbyists or needed them at all.

        LOL.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          There is a profound difference between a lobbyist representing the commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the following lobbyists on McCain's staff.

          http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...

          "Longtime uber-lobbyist Charles R. Black Jr. is John McCain's man in Washington. Black was Jonas Savimbi's man in the capital city. His lobbying firm received millions from the brutal Angolan guerrilla leader and took advantage of Black's contacts in Congress and the White House. Black and his partners were at times registered foreign agents for a remarkable collection of U.S.-backed foreign leaders whose human rights records were sometimes harshly criticized.

          McCain 'portrays himself as Mr. Clean, and then he has all these lobbyists around him who are connected to a lot of not-so-clean people.'"

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/201671...

            "John McCain's campaign asked prominent Republican consultant, Craig Shirley, to leave. Shirley doubled as a consultant to McCain and the group Stop Her Now, a 527 group barred from coordinating its activities with presidential campaigns.

            Shirley's firm, Shirley & Bannister Associates, was paid more than $22,000 by McCain for work to win conservative support. Stop Her Now has paid the firm more than $155,000 since 2007 for public relations work.

            Shirley's background is in some of the hardest hitting Republican attacks on Democratic politicians. He was a member of the team that tarred Michael Dukakis with the "Willie Horton" ads in 1988, and he helped organize the press conference with Paula Jones. In 2004, his company did public relations work for a movie attacking John Kerry called, 'Stolen Honor.'"

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2...

              "Sen. John McCain secured millions in federal funds for a land acquisition program that provided a windfall for an Arizona developer whose executives were major campaign donors.

              McCain, who has made fighting special-interest projects a centerpiece of his presidential campaign, inserted $14.3 million in a 2003 defense bill to buy land around Luke AFB in a provision sought by SunCor Development.

              The Air Force later paid SunCor $3 million for 122 acres near the base. It was the highest single land transaction of the private lots purchased by the government ââ;¬" three times the county's assessed value and twice the military's estimated value.

              McCain's campaigns have received $224,000 since 1998 from donors connected to Pinnacle West, including $104,100 for his current presidential run."

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                http://news.propeller.com/story/2008/04/26/mcca...

                "McCain's help for Keating came after Keating had donated $112,000 to McCain from 1982 to 1987, had taken McCain and his family on nine trips, including three to the Bahamas, and had gone in on a business deal with McCain's wife and father-in-law.

                In 1982, Keating held a fund-raiser for him, collecting more than $11,000 from 40 employees of American Continental Corp. In 1983, as McCain contemplated his House re-election, Keating hosted a $1,000-a-plate dinner for him, even though McCain had no serious competition. When McCain pushed for the Senate in 1986, Keating was there with more than $50,000. By 1987, McCain had received about $112,000 from Keating and his associates.

                The Arizona Republic revealed that McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center."

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                2 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  pc251 year, 7 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  The New York Times ran an article on January 28, 2008 revisiting the Keating scandal in addition to some other allegations of inappropriate behavior by McCain. Robert S. Bennett, whom McCain had hired to represent him in this matter, defended McCain's character. Bennett, who was the special investigator during the Keating Five scandal that The Times revisited in the article, said that he fully investigated McCain back then and suggested to the Senate Ethics Committee to not pursue charges against McCain because of "no evidence against him."The Ethics Committee concluded that Glenn's and McCain's involvement in the scheme was minimal.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    ybdogsct1 year, 7 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    McCain's actions may not have been prosecutable, but the Senate Ethics investigatory committee did rebuke McCain for exercising poor judgment.

                    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/195559...

                    "The Committee concludes that, given the personal benefits and campaign contributions he had received from Mr. Keating, Senator McCain exercised poor judgment in intervening with the regulators without first inquiring as to the Bank Board's position in the case in a more routine manner."

                    What's your excuse for McCain's links to lobbyists Charles Black, Craig Shirley, Doug Goodyear, Doug Davenport, Thomas G. Loeffler, SunCor, etc.? LOL.

                    http://mediamattersaction.org/freeride/lobbyists/

                    "Not only does the McCain campaign have more current and former lobbyist bundlers than any other candidate, but McCain has more current and former lobbyists working on his campaign staff than any other candidate in the 2008 presidential election."

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...

            Post Reply

            You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

            People Who Liked This Comment (21)

            People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)

            Submit a Story

            Advertisement

            Story Tags ?

            Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

            Dropping This Article

            No one has dropped this story.

            Groups Watching This

            No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

            Also Submitted By

            No one else has submitted this story.