« Back to story "Bush vs. Terror: Something's Working"

Story Comments

Posted by: Gransater 1 year, 7 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    Gransater1 year, 7 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    No. I'm saying that the oil used in Iraq has a greater overall influence than the so called increase in demand from countries like India and China.

    In other words, I don't believe India and China has anything to do with world wide increase of cost. If you read my response, you'd note that I believe speculators on the futures market carry the largest blame for increases, hanging on every negative tidbit they can find as justification to bid up the price.

    I'm certain you understood what I meant, even though you failed to address the other points, and chose instead to try to make the fuel usage in Iraq into a major issue. It isn't. You asked me what I considered had greater influence, NOT what was the major MARKET influence.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Gransater1 year, 7 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Also, on a sidebar, our ally, Saudi Arabia has had its spokesperson more than once say that they have a surplus in the production of oil, and will therefore not acomodate US requests to increase production.

      There is only two answers to that.

      1 - They are lying and aren't really runing a surplus.

      2 - US request for increased production blaming increased fuel costs on increased demand beyond production is a lie.

      Which party is lying, as both can't be right?

      Anyway, this is way of thread of this discussion, so I'm returning to it.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (2)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (2)

    Submit a Story

    Advertisement

    Story Tags ?

    Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

    Dropping This Article

    No one has dropped this story.

    Groups Watching This

    No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

    Also Submitted By

    No one else has submitted this story.