Food price "catastrophe" feared on eve of summit »
Posted By DiffeeOnline 1 year, 1 month ago in StyleSoaring food prices could trigger a global catastrophe and the world's poor need action, not words, from this week's U.N. food security summit, human rights activists and the World Bank said on Monday.
Read Full Story at reuters.com »
524 Views Share Story 23 Comments Report
Submitted By:
DiffeeOnline
Social media, politics, technology, news, marketing, and the environment. These are my passions. These are the things that I spend more time with than anything ...
Other Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 52 (view all)
-
-
0%
BB641 year, 1 month ago
So what you're saying is we need population controls. Say we stop sending food to the poor. Let African, Asian and Central American nations die off. Wow once again we have the libs acting like the Nazis.
You want to lower food prices, stop pouring corn into your gas tanks. Besides the environmental disasters, which ethanol waste really is, it's a hugely inefficient fuel. To get one gallon of ethanol requires at least 5 gallons of fossil fuel. No mater how liberal you are, even you can understand that doesn't make sense. That plus when you burn ethanol it actually reduces you standard mileage by the same percentage as the amount of ethanol. 10% ethanol means you lose 10% in mileage. It's a terrible scam the left pushed.
Reply -
0%
BB641 year, 1 month ago
So in order to reduce the population you're in favor of mass genocide through starvation. Then again the Nazis favored murder too.
You want farmland used less, stop trying to jam corn into my gas tank. It's a terrible product that requires much more energy than it will ever produce. It reduces your mileage and is very damaging to your car. That plus it takes around 5 gallons of fossil fuel to make and ship 1 gallon of ethanol. Even for liberals can figure out this isn't a good deal. Then again we're talking about liberals.
Reply
-
-
0%
gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago
FTA
Hunger campaigners have targeted the recent rise in bio-fuels -- usually the conversion of food crops into energy -- as one of the main culprits for the price rise and say the summit should declare a ban on arable land being switched to biofuel production.
"To continue the pursuit of biofuels in the face of the credible, impartial and growing opinion that this is exacerbating the food crisis is morally outrageous and utterly indefensible," said Rob Bailey, of hunger campaigners Oxfam.
Under U.S. plans, about a quarter of the U.S. corn crop will be channeled into ethanol production by 2022 as an alternative to crude oil.
U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer played down the impact of biofuels on food pricing, saying they only contributed 2-3 percent of overall price rise. Oxfam says the real figure is closer to 30 percent.
Reply-
0%
joeblowe1 year, 1 month ago
Already the case. Haven't you heard about all the people "existing" on sub-standard rations? It's ALREADY to the point where everyone on the planet can't be fed properly.
Reply -
-
-
0%
DropkickaLib1 year, 1 month ago
I'm not big on biofuel but much more of the problem is due to uncontrolled birth rates in some of the world's poorest areas. We don't have over one billion people...India and China do.
Reply -
0%
BB641 year, 1 month ago
Gama, Ethanol is a huge problem. There is so much money available to farmers so they grow corn, it's reduced other crops. The US plan you're showing is after all the plants and productions are in place. They're not and thats where the problem is. In fact, you're seeing rain forests in Malaysia being clear cut to plant corn for the US markets. Doesn't sound like a good idea to me. But then again, Global Warming is the new religion so it doesn't have to make sense.
Reply
-
-
0%
gamahuche1 year, 1 month ago
I've been watching for the last 10 years more and more hillsides in my homeland turning a very ugly shade of yellow. For a long time I didn't know what it was but of course its that very appropriately named rape - destined for fuel production.
What is really egregious about this story is that there is nothing that couldn't be - and wasn't - predicted a long time ago.
But as usual money talks and landowners are willing to sell to the highest bidder without even worrying about what a diet of rapeseed will be like when that's all that's left to eat.
Reply-
0%
BB641 year, 1 month ago
You want it stopped, get rid of the current congress and senate. They're the ones who are convinced ethanol is the solution. Remove them and you would see change.
Reply
-
-
0%
Norma1561 year, 1 month ago
Although there is disagreement about the real size of the ethanol mandate's contribution to increased food prices, there's no doubt it's a significant contributor. Also, increased energy prices play a significant role.
Let's get real about the "energy crisis." Fully eighty five percent of reserves in this country are off limits to the oil companies. Are we nuts?
Reply-
0%
LeftTurn1 year, 1 month ago
No, we know full well, and we even made them "Land Conservation" and National Parks spots so they'd never be touched for a long time, so why do we do that?
My take are these simple facts...
1) Look around you, everything you touch, use, drive or drive on, talk on, ect, is made of vinyl or some kind of petroleum.
2) Look around other third world countries with a leading number of reserves, everything they see is made of wood, concrete and burnt metal and that's the way the US wants it. Because if they are selling mostly all their oil, they have less to manufacture into common items, and more over, less for high tech weaponry, computers, which slows advancement of these countries to a standstill.
This is total victory for the US, because we'll use all their oil until it's gone and then horde ours back home, these third world countries will be complete wastelands by that time with no resources.
Hey, and if we try to starve half the earth before hand, all the better right?
Reply
-
-
0%
kikyqi1 year, 1 month ago
This topic is discussing very hot at JSeniorMatch. c om. Some 30 40 mature babies like going there for discussing.
Reply -
0%
thoughtforsale1 year, 1 month ago
The problem of growing food prices can only be solved together. Those who suffer most from it, should be heard, too.
We must achieve to end up with this paradoxal situation that those who earn the most, spent the smallest amount of their income for food, while the poorest cannot even fullfill their basic needs with everything they earn and own. Will the summit of Rome, once again, only be a comfortable round-table-debate, where everyone tries to look the most touched and engaged? How often will we hear the most popular phrase of politicians talk: "Something would have to be done."? Let us see, if deeds will follow!
Reply -
0%
joeblowe1 year, 1 month ago
As for the higher food prices, the obvious answer to that problem is: higher wages. Then we can afford the food. And maybe some gas. The enormous drain of money going to pay for oil imports (and that's true of EVERY oil importing country, not just the U.S.) is what's driving this situation. Is black, yucky, liquid hydrocarbon REALLY worth $135/bbl? Apparently the commodities traders think it WILL be soon enough. Why? Because there hasn't been enough money put into alternate energy sources quickly enough. We should have several dozen more nuclear plants MORE than we have now. My God, even the FRENCH generate 80% of their electricity with nuclear plants. Are we more afraid of atomic energy than the FRENCH? I mean seriously!
Reply -
-
0%
nostalgia1 year, 1 month ago
What went on in Zimbabwe destroyed a large pert of the food supply Africa had:
ZIMBABWE'S LAND REFORM PROGRAM DESTROYED "BREADBASKET OF AFRICA"
Six years after President Mugabe sanctioned violent invasions of Zimbabwe's commercial farmland -- mostly but not entirely white owned -- by landless peasants, the facts show that the so-called new farmers have failed dramatically to produce crops to feed their countrymen.
The poor peasants who led the invasions, at the behest of Mugabe, have since been driven off the best farms. The prime properties have been reallocated to the president and his close relatives, ministers, top judges, armed forces, police officers, and pliant journalists. These farms are mainly used as weekend retreats and, for the most part, have ceased to be productive.
http://www.albionmonitor.com/0612a/zimbabwefarm...
The last farm bill did nothing to help either
Aside from subsidizing ethanol from corn, we are still paying farmers NOT to plant crops
Reply
-
-
0%
simonsez1 year, 1 month ago
Taking acreage out of food to grow fuel is the absurdity of the planet at the moment.
The planet prepared our fuel over billions of years. All organisms contributed to it in a manner that allows the modern acreage to be used for vegetation and food production. It even stores it deep in the ground for us.
An unbelievable gift to mankind.
Reply -
-
0%
Dionys1 year, 1 month ago
"I have a feeling this isn't good for the world's poor, words is all the U.N. is usually good for...."
Though usualy only because countries full of themselves like the US will only commit to helping if it serves them financially. The UN is only as strong as its constituant members and their wilingness to abide by decisions. As one of the few permanent members with Veto power, the US should step up more often to guide the world in the right direction.
Reply
-
-
0%
Cityslicker1 year, 1 month ago
Here is a thought , lower the price of Oil and Food prices might just go down as well , all except Corn , Environmentalist need Corn as a hedge against Oil .
Weren't for Ethanol the , "Environmentalist Cash Crop" , we would have reasonable priced Corn Products .
Thought they used GM (genetically modified) Corn for that anyways , not fit for human consumption !
Reply -
0%
hyperbola1 year, 1 month ago
The source of 50 % increases in food prices in the past 1-2 years has exactly the same source as skyrocketing gas prices - speculation by corrupt financial companies aided and abetted by corrupt government.
The Great Oil Swindle
How much did the Fed really know?
The Commodity Futures and Trading Commission (CFTC) is investigating trading in oil futures to determine whether the surge in prices to record levels is the result of manipulation or fraud. They might want to take a look at wheat, rice and corn futures while they're at it. The whole thing is a hoax cooked up by the investment banks and hedge funds who are trying to dig their way out of the trillion dollar mortgage-backed securities (MBS) mess that they created by turning garbage loans into securities. That scam blew up in their face last August and left them scrounging for handouts from the Federal Reserve.
Reply-
0%
hyperbola1 year, 1 month ago
Now the billions of dollars they're getting from the Fed is being diverted into commodities which is destabilizing the world economy; driving gas prices to the moon and triggering food riots across the planet.
...There are three things that are driving up the price of oil: the falling dollar, speculation and buying on margin.
The dollar is tanking because of the Federal Reserve's low interest monetary policies have kept interest rates below the rate of inflation for most of the last decade. Add that to the $700 billion current account deficit and a National Debt that has increased from $5.8 trillion when Bush first took office to over $9 trillion today and it's a wonder the dollar hasn't gone "Poof" already....
... As far as "buying on margin" consider this summary from author William Engdahl:
Reply
-
-
0%
talkgoldcom1 year, 1 month ago
This is just the business cycle. Prices will drop once the US and Global economies recover in my opinion.
Reply -
0%
YankeeBiotch1 year, 1 month ago
The only way we can stop this is if we switch to the "FOOD STANDARD!" I mean it, I know it sounds funny but it is more valuable than GOLD!!
Reply
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.