Story Comments
Posted by: tanglang 1 year, 5 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
Neutral
tanglang1 year, 5 months ago
-
Neutral
slate1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Man oh man; Special K had to do something to be remembered by. Hey but if it's true let's get it rolling, tomorrow. Will the brave dems actually have what it takes to do more than posture for the up coming election?
Remember, the Republicans weren't skert and actually went through the process. I'll bet a nanner to a dolla that the Dems will not have what it takes to do more than beat their chest and use this action in campaign adds.
Let's see 6 months left and the brave K has put forth something that is used more as extra ammo for their Golden One to win in November. After all, who's going to want to vote for a party with articles of impeachment on record? Dang guys, you can't even come up with your own Ideas and have to steal them from Newt.
Reply-
Neutral
slate1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I like the idea of holding our politicians on BOTH side responsible, if Bush is Guilty I'll be right there with all you that hate him so much. Right now he's still innocent until you PROVE you accusations,,,,, you know accusations that are unproven as of yet. If your gonna talk the tough talk let's actually seem some action, the Democratic run House and Senate has done little more than Bloviate for 2 years.
AS I said, I like to see BOTH parties held accountable, so while your at it Denny, remember to finish off the guy with frozen money and Feinstein for lining her pockets with military money. Oh yeah, I'd also love for you to look into the carbon credit company that will rake in billions of dollars of payola that will not remove one nano-gram of stuff from the air.
Reply-
Neutral
ecotourusa1 year, 5 months ago
-
libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned103 Replies
-
Neutral
ecotourusa1 year, 5 months ago
-
Neutral
Endoscopy1 year, 5 months ago
-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
-
Neutral
ecotourusa1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
what i mean is: as a country we are being duped and dumbed down. and, if we continue we will have contributed to our enslavement...we're already 3rd world. or, had you noticed?
I recently had dinner with an economist and an exec with Chevron. IN a nutshell, the crux of conversation led to the conclusion that we need to conserve dramatically and bring the business back to america. we need to be better business folks. PERIOD! WAKE UP!
so, we have a resource called propeller and the internet. i think we should all stay in close touch and help each other as much as humanly possible.
social networks are King!
here's one I just joined. it focuses on the world as one.
we are all connected. check me out, register and add me as your friend!
Reply-
-
-
-
Neutral
ecotourusa1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
wow. not nice cushi. Tangent answered the question. Except, who knows where the money went. I dont have a problem with that one bit. look at the criminals both barack and john have accepted from their constituents. isn't barack's fundraiser being investigated as I type?
your point, Cushi?
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
raza91 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Last time I checked, the KKK and Nazi affiliations haven't really had much of an impact on public policy....
http://libertyposter.org/wp-content/uploads/200...
Reply
-
-
-
-
Neutral
walden31 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If you think Bush is innocent then you are uninformed or nonobjective.
The fact that you compare Hastert and Feinstein's alleged misdeeds with what's alleged in the Articles of Impeachment tells me that you're partisan.
Keep fiddling Nero.
Reply-
libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned6 Replies
-
-
Neutral
walden31 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If this was going to be a trial brought in a court in any city, county or federal court in the country more than enough evidence is public knowledge that would warrant a prosecutor to convene a grand jury. Between the war, the torture, the domestic spying program, signing statements and malfeasance with Katrina don't agree with me?
That's all we're asking for is a grand jury.
Reply
-
-
Neutral
BB641 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Walden, I think you're blaming the wrong person if all you complaint circles around Iraq. Saddam was accused by Bush 41 and Clinton of having WMD, that included chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. We've found the chemical and bio weapons or at least products buried that were supposed to have been destroyed. As to nuclear, I wonder about it. We haven't found much of anything, even the stuff we know he purchased prior to the Gulf War. I suspect all of this went to Syria. While not friendly, in fact Saddam had a plot to kill Assad, for some reason Saddam's family is now under the protection of the Syrian Army. That had to be paid for with something. Perhaps one of the trucks filled with money or other valuables, perhaps something more sinister. Such as the chemical, biological or nuclear weapon destroyed in Syria last summer by the Mossad.
Don't impeach Bush, he's got 6 month to go. Investigate the CIA and their 15 years of faulty intel.
Reply-
Neutral
djn3nunez31 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Bush 41 kenw he had chemical because he and Raygun help Saddam stockpile them. The nuke program Saddam had started was destroyed in the first gulf war and was never re-consituted. Clinton never advocated the use of US ground troops in an invasion and occupation and Bush 41 wrote and published his reasons for not removing Saddam.
The only chemical and bio weapons we've found were leftovers from Bush41/Raygun days.
Syria does not have Saddams fabled WMD Stockpile or production facilities, their still steaming around the Indian ocean dontchaknow......
Reply-
-
-
baddad59Comment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
Neutral
Blackacereturn1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Bush 41 and Clinton of having WMD - Did either of these presidents started this war? And wasnt this a war on terror those that knocked down the WTC? What did WMD in Iraq have to do with BNL?
Don't impeach Bush, he's got 6 month to go. Investigate the CIA and their 15 years of faulty intel.
I bet if you investigated the CIA you would find many more reasons to impeach bush.
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
mesodude1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"AS I said, I like to see BOTH parties held accountable, so while your at it Denny, remember to finish off the guy with frozen money and Feinstein for lining her pockets with military money."
--As usual, your upside down perspective rears its ugly head, slater. Cons have been crapping their pants over that 90 grand ever since lying criminal and Bushco wh0re ALBERTO GONZALES totally BOTCHED the criminal investigation. With $5 a gallon gas on the horizon, why don't wingjobs bitch over what Cheney and Big Oil execs discussed (on the taxpayers dime and time) in those secret energy meetings? Why don't you cry and shriek on endlessly about the more than 12 BILLION of your tax dollars GOP sleazebags gave to oil companies? Please explain your bizarre fascination with William Jefferson while we're learning that Abramoff was in contact with the White House more than seventy times (yep...Bush doesn't know him...sure). Explain your schizoid perspective, please. ;-(
Reply-
Neutral
dubruoy1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I agree with you as to having both parties held accountable. I think there is so much corruption in the Democratic party and Republican party because the people on Capitol Hill seem to forget who it is they represent and what document they have sworn to uphold. I think there are a lot of them that should be shown the door and Americans who want to serve the country ushered in in their stead.
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
tchef1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
When the Republicans brought impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton they had a clear majority in Congress. The Democrats only have a slight majority at this time. And since the Republicans will not cross over and support impeachment because of the further damage it will do to their party nothing will get accomplished.
Reply-
Neutral
Will13131 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And since the Republicans will not cross over and support impeachment because of the further damage it will do to their party
---
If overwhelming evidence of guilt is presented.. YOU CAN BET YOUR ASS IN AN ELECTION YEAR THEY WILL CROSS OVER... or not be in the club anymore.. VOTERS HAVE HAD ENOUGH.. Bush as stretched the rubber band as tight as it will go..
Reply-
Neutral
tchef1 year, 5 months ago
-
-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned6 Replies
-
Neutral
Blackacereturn1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Tchef - I think if you expose these guys to the light they will turn on him like a crow on a rotten flesh! What they have been able to do is stop this from moving forward. I think once it does people will be out there trying to cover their asses and then you have him. At this point the corporate media is protecting him but they too will turn on him for fear that the people will turn on them!
Get them out in the open I say and then the cookie will crumble!
Reply
-
-
-
baddad59Comment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
Neutral
ecotourusa1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Slate-
take the time to watch this video. It might teach you something about the bush clansmen.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274...
Reply -
-
Neutral
mesodude1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Man oh man; Special K had to do something to be remembered by. Hey but if it's true let's get it rolling, tomorrow. Will the brave dems actually have what it takes to do more than posture for the up coming election?"
--If you truly cared about getting to the truth, you would've wanted the "brave" GOP to get the ball rolling during the six years *they* were in control of the Congress. Perhaps if they had, they would'n't have lost in 2006 and they wouldn't be getting sent packing in record number come November. There's a price to be paid for backing Bush against the interests of the American people for 8 years and it's the implosion of the GOP. I'm loving watching it with each passing day.
Reply
-
-
-
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (15)
MacR
vidman04
AlphaGnosis
CactusAnnie
slate
aniokly
protoham
birddog54
tkyrchncs
baddad59
DropkickaLib
NixiePeople Who Didn't Like This Comment (34)
-
TGrass3001
-
joey-evans
-
cushi
-
tomohawk
-
TemplarScribe
-
sailr
-
Poulenc
-
gamahuche
-
miklkit
-
hamy
-
Teech
-
KicBoxStallion
-
questionseverything
-
djn3nunez3
-
smeejay
-
DukeOhara
-
Maui
-
Calebe
-
GrandMaster
-
mesodude
-
jrmunro
-
ecotourusa
-
Blackacereturn
-
dunkirk
-
scott4261
-
sir_samurai
-
beymudakov
-
transient
-
expursuit
-
RussianThreats
-
IneedIwantIgottahave
-
MacBookForMe
-
PresidentBuckheadd
-
nihonkaku
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.