Story Comments
Posted by: xlegultx 1 year, 6 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
-

david_nwpa1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Except that religion is NOT a requirement of marriage. A heterosexual atheist couple can wed before a justice of the peace, and no one's religious rights are infringed. Gay couples could wed before a Justice of the Peace, a ship's captain or a religious person who does not object to such a wedding. Your religious rights should not trump those of other people! After all, in the eyes of the law, marriage is a civil institution.
Reply-
libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned1 Reply
-
-

hamy1 year, 6 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No. That is the law. The law says that polygamy is not allowed in this country. Polygamists aren't born. They are not a protected class of citizen under the fair housing or equal treatment policies of this country.
This isn't about religion. It has nothing to do with religion. I could care less if I can't get married in a church. I just want the rights afforded every other tax paying citizen.
That or I pay lower taxes. You decide.
Reply
-
People Who Liked This Comment (3)
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (3)
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.