« Back to story "Supreme Court Justices Rule Terror Suspects Can Appeal in Civilian Courts"

Story Comments

Posted by: berkeley 1 year, 6 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
berkeley1 year, 6 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

i imagined that any federal judge agrees to uphold the rule of law. changing that agreement would allow or require congress to retract the contract, which is called impeachment.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
1 Reply

loading ...
- Neutral
  Beau78901 year, 6 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  I agree that Scalia's wrong, but it is his job to interpret the law.
  Of course, his judicial activism is way beyond his job description, and the other justices should recognize that and keep that activism in check. Unfortunately, Scalia has Clarence Thomas under some kind of mind control, and Alito and Roberts will go along with anything the Bush administration wants.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...