« Back to story "Overlooked: Obama's Anti-Smear Site"

Story Comments

Posted by: UnusualSuspect 1 year, 6 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    UnusualSuspect1 year, 6 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    And Obama's going to need this site because I can see more swift-boating groups on the horizon than we ever thought possible, slinging all kinds of mud and garbage. I personally would ignore the conservative crap, but I know not politicians believe in doing that...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    9 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Candida1 year, 6 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I used to think that it's best to ignore mudslinging, but after watching Kerry sink in the swamp they'd created, I too probably would try to fight it.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        blinkers1 year, 6 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        It's a devious strategy, (but with a proven track record of success), i.e., hurl enough slurs, innuendo, exaggerations, false accusations, downright lies, and assorted negativity at your opponent hoping that enough stick (or enough doubts are raised in the minds of the undecided)in order for your chosen candidate to look that much more electable.

        This Rovian strategy, refined from the Nixon book of "dirty tricks" and even earlier, has worked before, but will it work again?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Blackacereturn1 year, 6 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      You are soo correct UnusualSuspect! I watch the talking heads last night and you can see the worry in their eyes. One on fox first name Shaun/Shawn (don't know how he spells itâ;¦don't care either), find this disturbing because it meant he doesn't get to spread his lack of veracity, without it being immediately challenged.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Georgia501 year, 6 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      usualsuspect:

      So for example, if Obama has a fundraiser and organizer working to support his campaign, and one were to discover that this person is the son of an al-Qaeda operative that our government is attempting to deport, would this be considered by the Daily KOS moonbats to be:

      1. newsworthy?

      2. swiftboating?

      3. an unjustified attack on Obama?

      4. legitimate information for voters to consider?

      5. a law enforcement issuse?

      Please pick the ones that apply and explain your answers.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        ybdogsct1 year, 6 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        GEORGIA:

        "So for example, if Obama has a fundraiser and organizer working to support his campaign, and one were to discover that this person is the son of an al-Qaeda operative that our government is attempting to deport"

        So for example, if McCain has a fundraiser and organizer working to support his campaign, one were to discover that this person is a lobbyist who was paid to represent Burma's military junta, which had been strongly condemned by the Bush Administration and State Department for its human-rights record, would this be newsworthy?

        So for example, if McCain has a fundraiser and organizer working to support his campaign, one were to discover that this person was a lobbyist who was paid to represent Angola guerrillas, whose human-rights records have been harshly criticized, would this be newsworthy?

        Whoops. These two scenarios are NOT hypothetical. These people ACTUALLY ARE PART OF MCCAIN'S CAMPAIGN TEAM.

        Please explain YOUR answers. LOL.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          ybdogsct1 year, 6 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          http://www.newsweek.com/id/136321

          "McCain, who has portrayed himself as a crusader against special interests, is surrounded by lobbyists. Doug Goodyear, McCain's selection for GOP Convention Chair, is CEO of DCI Group, a consulting firm that earned $3 million last year lobbying for ExxonMobil and GM.

          Goodyear's firm was paid $348,000 to represent Burma's military junta, which had been strongly condemned by the State Department for its human-rights record and remains in power today. His firm created a PR campaign to burnish the junta's image, denouncing 'falsehoods' by the Bush administration that the regime engaged in rape and other abuses.

          Goodyear's firm also pioneered so-called 527 groups, precisely the kind of operations that McCain, in his battle for campaign-finance reform, has denounced.

          Ironically, Goodyear was chosen for the post after the McCain campaign nixed another candidate, Paul Manafort, who runs a lobbying firm with McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis."

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            ybdogsct1 year, 6 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...

            "Longtime uber-lobbyist Charles R. Black Jr. is John McCain's man in Washington. Black was Jonas Savimbi's man in the capital city. His lobbying firm received millions from the brutal Angolan guerrilla leader and took advantage of Black's contacts in Congress and the White House. Black and his partners were at times registered foreign agents for a remarkable collection of U.S.-backed foreign leaders whose human rights records were sometimes harshly criticized.

            What the firm achieved was quickly dubbed 'Savimbi chic.' Foreign-agent records document hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on behalf of UNITA, including $76,491 for limousines, $13,675 for photography and $216,186 for lodging at the Grand Hotel and the Waldorf-Astoria.

            McCain 'portrays himself as Mr. Clean, and then he has all these lobbyists around him who are connected to a lot of not-so-clean people.'"

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...

        Post Reply

        You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

        People Who Liked This Comment (17)

        People Who Didn't Like This Comment (4)

        Submit a Story

        Advertisement

        Story Tags ?

        Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

        Dropping This Article

        No one has dropped this story.

        Groups Watching This

        No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

        Also Submitted By

        No one else has submitted this story.