States Reject Bush's Abstinence-Only Funding »

Posted By Neophile 1 year, 4 months ago in News

Skeptical states are shoving aside millions of federal dollars for abstinence education, walking away from the program the Bush administration touts for slowing teen sexual activity. Barely half the states are still in, and two more say they are leaving.

Read Full Story at huffingtonpost.com »

1223 Views Share Story 52 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Neophile

I'm a Propeller Scout so if you have any questions or concerns, send me a message and I'll be happy to help.

Other Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Showing 305 of 315 Comments (view all)
- Display
  • Neutral
    chuck-the-canuck1 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Do you know why Laura is always on top when she and the "great decider" have sex?

    Bush can only f*ck up.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    71 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    TheNewsseeker1 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Teens should not get restricted like that! They should experience sexuality as one of the greatest gifts god gave to us, men and women. They have to make use of it with responsibility, but it should never cause fear and shame.

    A surpressed sexuality, burdened with the idea of sin, is much more dangerous than the natural discovery of the other sex, whenever it is the right time. Nevertheless, it is very necessary to talk about the dangers of an early pregnancy at school. But abstinence is only one method of preservation. The chemical, biological and "mechanical" ones should also be introduced to the kids.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    105 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    jordan111 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    131 million squandered every year on this 'abstinence only' nonsense. Has it worked in the areas it's used? Nope. Texas is at the top of teen pregnancy. Dang morons who came up with this!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    12 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    DropkickaLib1 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    If the Huffnpuff Post said it, it must be true!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    8 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • Neutral
    BB641 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Actually using Milwaukee as an example, I was on the committee that created the Human Growth and Development program. It's clearly shown two or three very clear problems. Without changing attitudes and getting the parents involved, you're not going to prevent much. Teen STD's and pregnancies are up. And that's with a "balanced" program offered by MPS. Perhaps it's time to start licensing parents.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      pb11571 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Why on earth would they turn away FREE money? I mean, c'mon! I'll start teaching abstinence if the government started paying me millions!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Poulenc1 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      "Skeptical states are shoving aside millions of federal dollars for abstinence education, walking away from the program the Bush administration touts for slowing teen sexual activity. Barely half the states are still in, and two more say they are leaving...."

      The mantra is of course that teens should be taught all the methods that help one avoid unwanted pregnancy and STD's, not to forswear sex entirely.

      "Teach abstinence" in this context means inculcate belief IN abstinence--the goal of puritans, the religiously orthodox, and of politicians, like M. Bush, who wish to manipulate them to get or stay in power.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      BB641 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I live in Wisconsin and have attended classes in the public schools concerning sex ed. While the feds may pay for abstinence only, other organizations such as planned parent hood, joined in. We have a very extensive sex ed program in Milwaukee. Along with one of the highest underage teen pregnancy rates in the country. It's clear teaching sex ed, no matter whose curriculum you use is a failure if the parents are losers. There's a sick culture among teens where they feel the only way they can be a "man" is to father a bunch of kids. We need to change that thinking completely or we're never going to see a change.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      9 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Charlson1 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I have no problem of abstinence being taught to school kids as one of the methods for preventing unwanted pregnancies but to make it the ONLY method taught is destructive and short changes the children on information.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      20 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      What really burns my muffin is that 1/3 of the resources the U.S. has committed for AIDS prevention in Africa MUST go to abstinence-only efforts. These are programs for ADULTS we're talking about! Warehouses full of condoms sit until they expire because there are no funds available for distribution. This sort of Puritanical nonsense is letting people die, pure and simple.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      david_nwpa1 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      One of the other drawbacks to abstinence only programs is that they are woefully inadequate at answering questions about sex that goes beyond pregnancy. Yes, believe it or not, people have sex without the intent of getting pregnant. As others have said, it misses the concept of STDs, homosexuality, bisexuality, and other forms of sexual contact. Older children may be naive about such topics, but they are not stupid. They know these things exist, but do not have much valid information about them.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      6 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      joeblowe1 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      What does this illustrate? GREED! All the states wanted the federal handout. So, they foolishly agreed to a program they MUST have known WOULD NOT WORK just to get their hands on some federal money - produce a few job openings in their state. Now, a little later on when the program they must have KNOWN would fail (let's face it - it's MONUMENTALLY stupid!) is having the effect (none, or worse yet- harmful) that any sensible person could have predicted, and they are forced to bail out to try and put the train wreck back on the tracks.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        joeblowe1 year, 4 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        And another thing. Carping about how PARENTS should teach -- well, pretty much ANYTHING to their kids - is crazy talk. Teachers are PROFESSIONALS and THEY are the ones who should be presenting a concise, ACCURATE, and timely program to the kids. Seriously now, what parents should be teaching kids is MAYBE whatever they really know. Like whatever they do for a living. And maybe right from wrong. Sh*t from shoe polish. Stuff like that. Most parents are NOT qualified to be teachers. And really - the kids who need it MOST are more than likely in single parent homes, or homes where the PARENTS never learned much. Asking a parent to be CONCERNED and to show interest - OK fine, I'll agree with that. But for the actual teaching part, let's leave it to the professionals. That's what our tax dollars are paying for. (unless the damn government interferes - then it's time for a visit to the school board.)

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          TrueProgressive1 year, 4 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Except for Dropkick, most of this discussion has been both pretty civil, and very insightful, IMO. The problem results from human evolution colliding with modern society. The human animal is ready to reproduce at about age 12 to 13. For most of human existence, this was a benefit not a problem. Early and prolific reproduction allowed paleolithic and neolithic humans to climb into history. Even after that, humankind was almost all agrarian. This required a constant re-supply of young humans to tend the farms. That "yonder fair maiden" of medieval times was a girl of 11-14. If a young woman was not married and having babies by 16, something was wrong. Spinsterism began around age 20.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            TrueProgressive1 year, 4 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            [Continuing with the comment] Modern technological society changed all this. With medical and hygienic technology drastically cutting human mortality rates, prolific human reproduction is now more bane than benefit. The vastly lengthened educational development time young persons need to survive today makes early reproduction a handicap to themselves and society. The challenge is how to reconcile biology's ferocious call on young people to have babies with modern society's need to delay all that.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              TrueProgressive1 year, 4 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              [Continuing] I was actually with you, BB until the "welfare check" part. (Suburban flight, inner city decay, and the ever widening gap between the rich and the rest of us that make professional sports, rapping, and gangsta far more attractive to inner city men than a "family man's" life have nothing to do with the problem, right?) "Morality" encompasses far more than just sexuality. One result of linking morality to sexuality is the preaching of "morality" by the most amoral presidential administration in American history. Morality results from how one orients him or herself to human dignity. Parents, or some other positive role model, are the ultimate determinate of a child's orientation to dignity. Parents are, thus, integral, not only to sex ed, but to the child's entire development.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                TrueProgressive1 year, 4 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                [Continuing] On the other hand, it's far easier to become a parent than to be one. Society, through its schools, must take up the slack and give kids the basic knowledge of sexuality's mechanics. Teens have sex not just because they're in depression, want peer approval, or are rebels. They also do it because they're horny as hell, and aren't going to stop simply because some amorphous "God" commands them to. Understanding this, state governments are finally finding their "cujones" and telling Bush to shove his abstinence-only cr*p up where the sun don't shine.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply

                1 Reply

                loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                TrueProgressive1 year, 4 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Finally, I'd like to say a few words in Dropkick's defense. Take it easy on the boy, will you all. After all, his head was dropkicked as a kid, that's how he got his name. "Dropkick's head is down, the kick is up, IT'S GOOD!!!!!" The boy's brain damaged, for God's sake. When he's not soiling Propeller he's probably sitting in a wheelchair on a street corner drooling, with a cup tied to the chair and a sign around his neck, "This is what happens when you vote Republican." So please, have some pity on him, will you?

                That's all I have to say for now.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  antibrainwasher1 year, 4 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  James Dobson, the insane sociopathic right wing evangelical creationist anti-science nut job came up with abstinence only crap.

                  Dobson, the anti-christ, anti christian american hating propagandist liar is now attacking Obama for a speech on the bible he gave 2 years ago.

                  The religious conservatives can't support McCain because he's an ATHEIST, repeat McCain is an ATHIEST, baby jesus on a jet ski, McCain is an ATHEIST.

                  So the only thing left is to swiftboat Obama. These people arent christians. The religious right is NOT christian. The religious right is some sect of evangelical positive thinking yourself to riches, status quo, upperclass worshipping, money and war and oil worshipping cult. If you are a christian, help the poor. If you are a republican, f*ck the poor, vote republican.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                  Reply
                  loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    TrueProgressive1 year, 4 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Actually, if you're a Republican, you think f*ck everything and everybody except the upperclass, money, war and oil.

                    BTW, thank you Ciera Marie.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                    Reply

                    6 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    Tcaros1 year, 4 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Bush is the great decider. He decides everyone should practice abstinence.

                    And people are actually thinking of voting for his pupply dog, John McCain?

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                    Reply

                    1 Reply

                    loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    chevydog1 year, 4 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Don't really think that this has anything to do with what states or the school districts in them think about abstenince. Rather, I'm inclined to think that it's too little money with too many strings attached to justify the effort. That 's often a problem with Federal money going to school districts.

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      THOMNH621 year, 4 months ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      it's amazing how a story about the presidents desire to keep young people from having sex which leads to a host of social and economic disasters for young people is looked down upon by the states, the media and liberal morons here at libscape. Don't you think it would be at least worth a try, to see if we could help our young people from ruining their lives ( Obama's words) by not having babies, draining the welfare system, and reducing the chance they will ever know who the really are before becoming parents.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                      Reply

                      3 Replies

                      loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      simonsez1 year, 4 months ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      Libs on Propeller are like 16 year old boys, THOM; they don't want you telling girls not to do it.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                      Reply

                      2 Replies

                      loading loading ...
                    View All 315 Comments

                    Add a Comment

                    Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                    Forgot your password?

                    Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                    To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

                    More News

                    Submit a Story

                    Advertisement

                    Story Tags ?

                    Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

                    Also Dropping This Article

                    No one has dropped this story.

                    Groups Watching This

                    No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

                    Also Submitted By

                    No one else has submitted this story.