Story Comments
Posted by: chuck-the-canuck 1 year, 5 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
Neutral

chuck-the-canuck1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Do you know why Laura is always on top when she and the "great decider" have sex?
Bush can only f*ck up.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
NemoShiZniTComment removed: Spammer62 Replies
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
loading ...
-
Neutral

mesodude1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wait...We can barely scrape together enough *Americans* to keep Bush's criminal lie in Iraq from totally disintegrating before he leaves office and you're labeling Canada as "weak"? Wow... Con chickenhawkery is quite astounding.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wow, Libdouchebagchickenshitery is quite astounding. Haven't you beaten that broken drum too death yet? Get a new mantra to chant, libbot!
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

antibrainwasher1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think drop got his fewings hurt. I don't think he likes the 80% of americans who are sick of anti american american haters and their swiftboating antiscience, ad-hominem, character based smears.
vote republican, vote to have drop and his ilk in policy making positions. Vote american hating progressive hating status quo loving, loyalist partisan drug lamebaugh shills into policy managerial positions.
Drop, you are a great republican. Abstanance does not work as policy, which has been proven to death in statistical study after statistical study, but don't worry about the truth. Its all relative for a good republican. vote for Drop, you'd get more votes than super senior senile McBush.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You hate America with your lying smears and your reference to "Swiftboating" is simply a way to whine about anyone who points out inconvenient facts. You are an appeasing, libanazi who goose steps to the beat of the Leftist drum. Anti, you aren't great at anything!
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

antibrainwasher1 year, 5 months ago
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
Neutral

dunkirk1 year, 5 months ago
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
-
-
-
Neutral

Natureboy1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Actually, he's doing it from your mom's bedroom. The word is she's not half bad if you can get past the smell.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
NemoShiZniTComment removed: Spammer
-
-
-
Neutral

tanglang1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Online you can make as much as you want. There isno way to prove it so shush! Here, this is what you sound like.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GcVnhNjWV0
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
-
loading ...
-
-
-
-
AtheismIsRealityComment removed: Retracted by user9 Replies
-
Neutral

tanglang1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So you're saying we should all follow Gloucester's lead?
I think not. Look, when the schools can finally master teaching Reading, Writing and Arithmetic THEN and only then should we allow them to teach something else.
Right now our schools are graduating morons. They are failing at teaching the basics so why the hell do you think they should teach your kids about sex?
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

Bacalao1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
what kind of learning do you expect to put on our childrens when the bible is now a science text book?
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
AtheismIsRealityComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
-
Neutral

tanglang1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Just because schools produce "morons" does not equate to an indictment of the material being taught."
I agree. My point was they are not doing their job so why should we give them another one?
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
AtheismIsRealityComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
Neutral

Tangent0011 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You have clearly had a bad experience with public education. Whether that is first-hand or not, I don't know. My experience has been positive, both for myself, and my children.
There are clearly 'broken' districts, but I don't think they are the norm.
I think education should be a national priority. NCLB is a well-intentioned program, but the one-size-fits-all approach and lack of adequate funding has had only marginal success in improving sub-standard schools and has demonstrably harmed high-achieving schools.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

Candida1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
tanglang: "why the hell do you think they should teach your kids about sex?"
Because many parents don't. Besides, if schools are bad, whose fault is it?
I have a simple solution: those, and only those, who have never had a single extramarital sexual contact with anyone should be allowed to promote "abstinence only". It has worked for them, so they have earned the right to help others use the same method. The rest should just shut up about it or offer abstinence as one of the alternatives.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

tanglang1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Whose fault is it? Teachers unions? Leaders in Washington who are themselves worthless and are incapable effectivly doing their job.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
-
Neutral

tkyrchncs1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Does it GET more basic than sex? Oh yeah, there's breathing, and eating, and eliminating waste-presumably the kids mostly know about these three when they get to school---
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
-
-
AtheismIsRealityComment removed: Retracted by user1 Reply
-
loading ...
-
-
-
Neutral

mesodude1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Heavens! Struck a nerve, I see. ;-P Listen, Dropkickalib...(can I just call you dicky, for...um, short? Thanks in advance)...um, dicky, it's nice that the cons *want* to feel as if you're supporting the disaster in Iraq and I realize you think that by merely hoping and praying that other families will continue to do all the sacrificing, while cheerleader cons buy all the American flags, "Support the Troops" magnets, beer mugs, boxer shorts, etc., but hundreds of thousands of people have died needlessly because of *YOUR* actions. You voted for Bush twice and, in my view, that makes you no less evil than Saddam Hussein. Harsh words, I know. That you will have to live with that knowledge for the rest of your life is, I'm sure, quite shameful. But think of the people your actions caused to DIE and who will never get a chance to type a post supporting the debacle in Iraq. Think about them, dicky. They deserve so much more than cons have given them. So very much more... ;-(
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
mesostupid,
You missed the nerve...amusing attempt at mental masturbation. Save your keystrokes and therefore your finger strength for signing your public assistance check.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

mesodude1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"mesostupid,
You missed the nerve...amusing attempt at mental masturbation. Save your keystrokes and therefore your finger strength for signing your public assistance check."
--Gee, Dicky...No reason to get irate. I was just saying I understand why cons wouldn't want to be reminded of the irony of voting for Bush so that we could save the people of Iraq from an evil dictator only for you to turn around and have your President (the man cons voted for TWICE) slaughter hundreds of thousands of Iraqis by unnecessarily and illegally invading their country. Just because their senseless deaths and the unforgivable deaths of so many young Americans and our allies were so violent and horrifying doesn't mean I don't appreciate what you're going through (knowing that *your* poor judgement and severe lack of education contributed to their lives being snuffed out). It doesn't mean I don't care, Dicky. ;-(
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Lack of education...funny stuff, mesodupped. We'll have to compare transcripts sometime when you dig out your GED.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

dunkirk1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ROFLMAO, keep your Ged RIGHT BY the computer so you can refresh your memory that yes you finally did get it?
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
-
Neutral

Candida1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
DropkickaLib: "We'll have to compare transcripts sometime"
No need. The posts here show quite clearly everyone's communication and critical thinking skills. I'm deliberately not using the word education because pieces of paper mean very little. I know from past posts that there are a few on Propeller, who have very little formal education but are clear thinkers nonetheless. Then there are those who may have the paper but have never learned to think.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral

injest1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
States Reject Bush's Abstinence-Only Funding
FTA
"A federal tally shows that participation in the program is down 40 percent over two years, with 28 states still in. Arizona and Iowa have announced their intention to forgo their share of the federal grant at the start of the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.
The program was created by Congress in 1996 as part of welfare reform."
"created by Congress in 1996"
Uhmm, do you know that Bush wasn't President in 1996?
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

dunkirk1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Pssst but your guys controlled Congress and tied tht into funding for a multitude of other things so if CLinton vetoed it he would have been accused of shortchanging education? Oh I keep forgetting tho that despitre 6 years of a REPUBLICAN controlled congress, Presidency and court system they were just incapable of changing that right? I mean why elect a REPUBLICAN they just never seem to be able to correct ANY of those problems you righties love to lay at Clintons feet, no matter how long ago it was. In fact based on some of your posts Carter is still controlling hte White House. AMazing, just so incapable of changin all those wroings they keep pointing to.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

injest1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Dunkirk
"Pssst but your guys controlled Congress and tied tht into funding for a multitude of other things so if CLinton vetoed it he would have been accused of shortchanging education?"
Pssst, Clinton DID veto the first attempt.
Pssst, Congress gave and Clinton signed into law by President on April 9, 1996
The Line Item Veto Act of 1996
Pssst, Clinton used the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 to cancel military spending
Clinton Vetoes 38 Military Items, Drawing Many Lawmakers' Ire
President Clinton used his new line-item-veto power today to pinpoint and strike from a vast military construction
Pssst, The welfare reform act was signed in to law August 22, 1996,
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.
Pssst, now don't you feel incredibly stupid?
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

dunkirk1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Psssst no since the line item veto wasnt applicable. You do understand that it was declared unconstitutional right? That almost immediately after it was passed by COngress it was challenged and Clinton vetoing the military spending was to push the issue? You do understand that right? Oh wait you don't understand that since you tried to say CLinton could have vetoed the bill using it. Dang facts getting in the way again.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral

HannibalBarca1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hey dropkicked in the head: Reason most Canadians love humour is because we live beside the worlds greatest two ring circus, hell the material that is supplied is priceless....LMAO
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
-
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
loading ...
-
Neutral

HannibalBarca1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
From what???Your enemies??? LMAO, they aren't ours, and since we are helping you in Afgan, don't ask for any more, mind you you sure need it.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Both World Wars, the Cold War...yeah, I guess they weren't that memorable. Canada continues to rely on us in the face of China's growing military strength and a resurgent Russia.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

HannibalBarca1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ROTFLMFAO, ohhh you are a hoot, try googleing Norman Bethune and China and you will find out where we stand with China.
Remember it was not until 1970 or so that your brilliant way of thinking recognized 25% of the worlds population, and it seems in your mind sink you are replacing USSR with the fight on Terror and soon that to be replaced with China; not my problem.
As for Russia well that is your problem too.
WE DON"T NEED YOUR PROTECTION; BUT WHO WILL PROTECT YOU FROM YOURSELVES; AND YOU NEED IT!.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sure you need our protection and some intensive psychotherapy. You're so deluded you think that the world will hold hands with Leftist Canada and everyone will sing Kumbaya if not for the big, bad U.S.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

HannibalBarca1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ROTFLMAO, hell big bad US can't protect herself, the Mexican Drug cartels show that.
And it seems you can't even reinforce Afgan with what is asked for, 10,000 more troops, until you can release them from Iraq.
And remember WW!! USA never got into a ground war in Europe till 43, but 2 years later the war was over, and here you are still fighting Iraq for 5 years with a dim view of the future, and you think I want that kind of protection.....OMG talk about delusional.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 10) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There's a difference between purposely opening your borders and being unable to defend them. Sounds like you're in the Taliban's corner, so you should be happy when things go roughly in Afghanistan.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 11) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

Candida1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
DropkickaLib,
You claim that the US has been protecting Canada. Against whom? Do you know which is the only country that has ever attacked Canada?
The good old United States of America.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 13) (recursion depth : 12) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Thanks for proving my point. Canada has been safe since it entered an alliance with the U.S. The War of 1812 was a long time ago and I seem to remember that we were invaded by Canada then. Tell the whole story please.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 14) (recursion depth : 13) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
-
-
Neutral

cloud151 year, 5 months ago
loading ...
-
Neutral

jordan111 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Careful now. You probably won't get any green stamps for insulting an ally. Best you stick to negs.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 13) (recursion depth : 12) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral

mesodude1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Canadians love humor? I'd rather they just paid for their own defense."
--Ok but...um, Dicky, you forgot to tell Hannibal how Bush is creatively financing our disgraceful invasion of Iraq. Ok...I'll do it... Hannibal, we're puttin it on our multi-trillion dollar American Express War card. ;-P Bush and the GOP worked it out so that we never run out of credit. Cool, huh? I guess membership has its privileges and all. ;-P
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
mesoduped,
You're supporting our nation's enemies as ardently as possible so don't blame yourself.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

mesodude1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"You're supporting our nation's enemies as ardently as possible so don't blame yourself."
--wow, Dicky...You are mighty touchy today. I was only telling Hannibal that we are borrowing trillions of dollars to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan and that our next two generations are gonna have to pay out the ying yang (hey..Dicky, what's a "ying yang" anyway? I always wondered where that saying came from) for Bush and the con cult's wargasm. That's alls I was trying to say, Dicky. ;-(
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

DropkickaLib1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You are might simple today mesosimple. I'm sure that the origin of a saying isn't all that leaves you mystied. Sorry to interrupt your recreational drug use with all this posting.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
-
-
-
-
-
loading ...
-
-
-
Neutral

dunkirk1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ROFLMAO< you keep forgetting Republicans have no sense of humor. Kinda like their short lived comedy show.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

Neophile1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
short lived comedy show?
you mean the time Giuliani ran for president of the united states of 9/11?
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

NoSpinDave1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"ROFLMAO"
Congrats!! Thats the 1,000,000 time you have started a post with that!!
What a tool.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
Neutral

dunkirk1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Gee Spinner it sounds like it gets under your skin. Or is it just providing you an excuse to NOT answer the points of the post? ROFLMAO. Seems you continue to prove that when the roight has nothing to counter with attack the messenger.
(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)Reply
loading ...
-
loading ...
-
-
-
loading ...
-
TcarosComment removed: Hard Banned
-
KvilleTXComment removed: Hard Banned
-
People Who Liked This Comment (36)
-
bonaroo
-
TGrass3001
-
Eagle_Eye
-
engineer
-
joey-evans
-
david_nwpa
-
Charlson
-
Neophile
-
Poulenc
-
Aidenag
-
miklkit
-
hamy
-
Teech
-
jovial
-
Hanyman
-
KicBoxStallion
-
amIdreaming
-
Alpes
-
Itachirumon
-
juvel
-
Will1313
-
Dionys
-
Shankari25
-
mesodude
-
fishifanb
-
dunkirk
-
tkyrchncs
-
HannibalBarca
-
sir_samurai
-
RussianThreats
-
IneedIwantIgottahave
-
tmac503
-
TheRealizer
-
bluetexasvalley
-
TrueProgressive
-
gbilly08
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (12)
Submit a Story
Advertisement
Propping This Article
view all »Dropping This Article
No one has dropped this story.
AOL News Links
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?
Categories
Also Submitted By
No one else has submitted this story.
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.