« Back to story "Overlooked: Paparazzi Vs. Surfers"

Story Comments

Posted by: 1-2-Oscar 1 year, 5 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
1-2-Oscar1 year, 5 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

I suppose that, as a photographer, you
1. Claim the right to deprive well-known individual like Matthew McConaughy any opportunity to relax on a public beach and enjoy the activities that other beachgoers enjoy.
2. Think it is your right to ""travel in packs, run red lights, make unsafe . . . U-turns in pursuit of their subject"
3. Disparage the mothers of those who object to your intrusive behavior.
and 4. Plan, with your critics "to have a huge rumble on the beach" to settle any differences.
Are these the characteristics that make you a serious photographer, Aidenag?
Wow, your life must be exciting.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
13 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  1-2-Oscar1 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  It's also somewhat disturbing that you not only support such behavior, you now will approach me armed with a weapon.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  1 Reply
  
  loading ...
  - PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
- Neutral
  Aidenag1 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Thank's for putting words in my mouth Oscar..
  I do not partake in that form of photography. I mostly do wildlife, nature, weddings and street photography. And was talking about photographers being attacked/assaulted in general. It happens more than just to paparazzi sleaze. And in 99% of cases, happens due to no fault of the photographer.
  As for "Depriving" a individual of their opportunity to relax, it's a public space Oscar. He, and the photographers both have just as much of a right to be there doing what they are doing.
  As for carrying a weapon, your damn right i do. Between the crazies and the people who look at my gear as a free meal-ticket worth more than most cars, i would be insane not to do so. If i had a dollar for every photog who had his equipment stolen or broken by others, i would be able to retire right now...
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  1 Reply
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    earthlingerer1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Wherever I go, I'm always carrying a camera, whether it's my cellphone, camera, or my video recorder.
    If I see something, anything, person, thing or place, while I'm out, it's caught.
    It will be a pretty obvious sign when I stop and take out and prepare my phone or camera, so anyone can turn, whatever.
    But if you start to yell or run, I'll just walk away... having taken my pictures.
    I know there's rights for both sides.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...
- PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive7 Replies
  - Neutral
    peaquod1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    You might feel differently if suddenly the paps found you and your personal private life so interesting that you couldn't go out to eat or a park without being dogged by these creeps....
    Every one deserves a little down time....I'd be willing to bet you wouldn't like to have your every public move documented...and published.
    Every one has something to hide.....
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    1 Reply
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      foksipayne1 year, 5 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Besides, what is soooooo interesting about someone doing a recreational activity? If he was just walking the beach, whoop ti do, and if he was surfing, it might be fun to watch on video, but a photo?
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
  - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned
  - Neutral
    Dionys1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    "He gave up that right by the profession and lifestyle he has chosen. "
    Garbage. He didn't give up any rights that every single average citizen retains. Just because someone is more well known than another person doesn't mean they should expect to be stalked, chased and put in danger by people with no basic morals, ethics or understanding.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    3 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned2 Replies
      - Neutral
        slyboy21 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Dionys is right. I've mentioned in other posts before that actors are entertainers and chose their profession to entertain people through films/shows, not to be stalked in real life. That's what reality tv is for (and even then it's usually fake). I seriously doubt that our president ( just as much of a public figure) would allow such paparazzi to follow him around day and be harassed.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        decipher1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        i've heard that even the president isn't immune. it think they're called the press, and i hear they do follow him around. after that there's the white house staff photographer... all awful, dirty little people.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
- Neutral
  Charlson1 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  You assume quite a bit. Do you know whether Aidenag is guilty of any of these claims? And I gave you a pos by mistake when I was trying to post under your assumptions.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...

Post Reply

You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

People Who Liked This Comment (8)

People Who Didn't Like This Comment (7)

Submit a Story

Advertisement