« Back to story "Overlooked: Paparazzi Vs. Surfers"

Story Comments

Posted by: Dionys 1 year, 5 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
Dionys1 year, 5 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Maybe. But if some nutjob or group of nutjobs was stalking me and my family, snapping photos of myself/family/children without permission 24/7 and putting peoples' lives at risk with their actions.. I'd wonder why *they* weren't being prosecuted.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
10 Replies

loading ...
- libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned9 Replies
  - Neutral
    Teech1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    "The surfers need to be prosecuted."
    Absolutely. Those selfish, liberal, privileged little California punks need to be tied up, beaten, and bent over a surfboard so the paparazzi can line up and have George Bush sex with all of them! That public beach in Malibu, like ALL public beaches and national parks, needs to be privatized and put on a "for profit" basis. That will eliminate a huge expense for tax payers and keep those little sh!t surf punks away.
    Also, all that oil off the Malibu coast needs to drilled for NOW! Oil will go down to $20 a barrel as a result and too damn bad if a little oil and tar washes up on those environ-wacko, filthy Dem, rich liberals' beach.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    5 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned4 Replies
      - Neutral
        Teech1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Well, Libs, since you asked a civil question and chose to attack the content of the post as opposed to the character of the posting person (a tactic I approve of wholeheartedly) I'll grace your question with a reply.
        THINK? sometimes, sometimes not. It depends on how much foam I expect from the mouths of the Cons I love to bait, or the Libs when I choose to rant from an opposite viewpoint. In any case, there is ALWAYS some emotion involved. Mea culpa. Sometimes, I just totally disengage the brain altogether and just let it spew! (Drives Slate crazy)
        But most of the time I post to get attention and see what other people feel, (emotion) or think regarding the topics that appear on Propellor.
        Damn...sometimes I ACTUALLY believe what I write! And I know that you don't take it personally when I neg everything you post on general principles. I certainly don't get bothered when you, and others, do likewise.
        A civil question always deserves a civil answer.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        DanmLiberalsComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
        
        Neutral
        Sabretooth1 year, 5 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        "We should start a Liberal vs. Con UFC and then really go at it."
        Excellent idea, the only problem i can forsee is who would the cons get to do their fighting for them?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        DanmLiberalsComment removed: Retracted by user
  - Neutral
    lfergie8121 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    libsRfunny
    "If you were an all-purpose public figure, they wouldn't need permission so long as you are in public view."
    Would you defend the actions of the paps that were after Princess Diana? Paparazzi chasing a speeding vehicle with cameras flashing in the driver's eyes. I don't understand why the paps weren't tried for vehicular manslaughter.
    Libs may be funny but neo-cons are ignorant.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    2 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      sjm2341 year, 5 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      right just like Libs wouldnt need permission to kick the holy ******ttt out of the irritating little peckers who are rudely disrepecting libs privacy.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - DanmLiberalsComment removed: Retracted by user