« Back to story "Overlooked: Sonar and Navy"

Story Comments

Posted by: injest 1 year, 4 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    injest1 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced

    By MATTHEW HICKLEY

    Last updated at 00:13 10 November 2007

    One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    17 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      lfergie8121 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I believe we should be worrying about China as an economical threat rather than a military one.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      16 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        Codi69341 year, 4 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        And when this economic threat decides to reclaim Taiwan. One sub gets a lucky shot and puts a carrier at the bottom of the ocean. Everyone is going to wonder how this happened.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        7 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          miklkit1 year, 4 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Active sonar(the kind that kills) is only used in the attack phase. After the threat is found. Before that it is useless.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          2 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            jimdoze1 year, 4 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Active sonar is worse than useless, when not in attack mode, because its source can be traced.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              injest1 year, 4 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              jimdoze

              "Active sonar is worse than useless, when not in attack mode, because its source can be traced"

              Uhm surface ships, Carrier Battle groups are not trying to hide.

              Submarines on the other hand, are trying to hide, that's why their under the water, that's why making them ultra quiet is the goal.

              That why surface ships need to use "Active Sonar" to locate them.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          B1BLancer1 year, 4 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          I believe we should be worrying about both.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            bigurn1 year, 4 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            I agree that China is an economic threat. Read "China 2030", an astounding read. Their policies suggest that their economic growth will be supported, in part, by their military strength.

            And.... THEY DON'T CARE. They will be successful, no matter how long or what they have to do. The Chinese see time in very long viewpoints, because their history is thousands of years long. They are a patient people, and are quite happy to peck away at their goals a little at a time.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            6 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              hyperbola1 year, 4 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Well given that the US has been using its military in support of business imperialism for over a century now, we are hardly in a position to complain. When and if we start closing down our 700 foreign military bases and stop threatening the whole world, then we might have reason to object to China, which so far has committed far fewer crimes than the US.

              Blowback

              The Costs and Consequences of American Empire

              http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blowback_CJoh...

              Abolish the CIA!

              http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/1984/chalmers_j...

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              5 Replies

              loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                tkyrchncs1 year, 4 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Over two centuries. Action against Tripoli began in 1801.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply

                4 Replies

                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  tkyrchncs1 year, 4 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Tripoli and the rest of the Barbary States had been demanding and RECEIVING "protection money" from the US to leave US vessels in the Mediterranean alone.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                  Reply

                  3 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                  • Neutral
                    hyperbola1 year, 4 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Yes, you are correct. That is why there are so many parts of the US with strong Spanish heritage that outdates the US. None the less, our imperialists really got the bit between their teeth on a world scale with the Spanish-American war. I wonder how many Americans know that in the last 100 years we have invaded Cuba five times or that we had to ask Brazil to help rescue our troops when the Mexicans were throwing them out just before WWI?

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                    Reply

                    2 Replies

                    loading loading ...
                    • Neutral
                      Endoscopy1 year, 4 months ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      You are looney tunes. You left out the Zionist part of this. I know somehow according to you the Zionists are responsible.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                      Reply

                      1 Reply

                      loading loading ...
                      • Neutral
                        mrbs1 year, 4 months ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        that is the first i can remember him not mentioning them

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                        Reply
                        loading loading ...

        Post Reply

        You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

        People Who Liked This Comment (5)

        People Who Didn't Like This Comment (3)

        Submit a Story

        Advertisement

        Story Tags ?

        Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

        Also Dropping This Article

        No one has dropped this story.

        Groups Watching This

        No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

        Also Submitted By

        No one else has submitted this story.