« Back to story "Source: Protective order will keep Viacom out of sensitive YouTube user data"

Story Comments

Posted by: tchef 1 year, 5 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
tchef1 year, 5 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

A sticky situation to be sure.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
4 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  Endoscopy1 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  And think about the fact that a lot of stories and posts here point to youtube. Will propeller be liable or the person posting the story or post pointing to youtube.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - baddad59Comment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
    - Neutral
      Mutainia1 year, 5 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      IF you are guilty, baddad59, that goes ditto for me. ALL postings I presented are from YouTube. The thing is, though, IF it becomes a crime for what we have done, it will kill off a LOT of stuff, and, possibly finish Propeller along with it. I mean, what about news articles that are written? Where do you draw the line? Well, a MySpace friend of mine, Suzi Oravec, is very happy for YouTube exposure (as little as it is, so far), and, I think she'll be pleased with my calling people's attention to her. It's not a criminal offense yet, so, I'll post one of her videos here. ENJOY... while you can, a talented, pretty, young artist you'd probably never meet if it WEREN'T for YouTube:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wVZkS_uv0o
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - baddad59Comment removed: Retracted by user