Foreclosures to rise whoever wins White House »
Posted By STONERS 1 year ago in NewsHome foreclosures will keep rising next year no matter who is elected president in November.
Read Full Story at news.yahoo.com »
314 Views Share Story 24 Comments Report
Submitted By:
STONERS
Welcome to my profile...I've started a ""STONERS Daily News Group"" Please stop by and have a look and join if you like it ...
Other Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 47 (view all)
-
0%
STONERS1 year ago
"Even the optimism that surrounds a new president taking office cannot resurrect home values overnight, and presidents have no direct ability to reduce rising mortgage rates. Nevertheless, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain both promise help for homeowners facing foreclosure."
Guess we will have to wait and see "who" will help.
Reply -
-
-
0%
bubba21 year ago
It sure will take many years.
Foreclosures are on a record pace in the Memphis area, especially rental property. Renters are being evicted, with little to no advance notice, because the owners of the rental properties have defaulted on their mortgages.
The vast majority of the American people continue to suffer because of the horrid mess and evil that has been perpetrated for the last 7 years by the Bush administration.
Reply-
0%
Teech1 year ago
Like nuclear, (nu-cue-ler) fallout, the toxic effects of the Bush administration will be with us for decades to come.
Reply
-
-
0%
Amazing11 year ago
As the dollar continues to circle the drain, the Fed will eventually be forced to raise interest rates. This will worsen the foreclosure mess. If they lower interest rates, everything else will rise in price. The Fed is between a rock and a hard spot. And they only make matters worse when they pump more fiat currency into the economy. Recession? Hah! I figure it's going to be a depression before all is said and done.
A new president cannot stop it. There are some things they can do to prevent further damage in the future. Like making sure lenders and borrowers alike are really looking at the viability of any home loan.
Reply-
0%
quackpot1 year ago
It will be hard to lower interest rates below zero, although the Bush "economists" might find a way.
The true problem for Bush is that with the intrest rates so low, one keystone of his economic "policy", PRINT MORE MONEY to support SPEND SPEND SPEND, is becoming harder to do.
Perhaps the Bush legacy of Print Money, devalue the dollar and give the profit to the ultra-rich is near an end.
OH, what is a Bushie to do without a printing press when the only option left is to borrow from our kids?
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
nostalgia1 year ago
This mess goes back to the Financial Services Competition Act of 1999
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Extensions of Remarks HON. SHEILA JACKSON-LEE
Today I rise in support of H.R. 10, the Financial Services Competition Act of 1999
Today's vote represents groundbreaking financial services legislation that would dismantle many of the depression era laws currently hindering the financial services industry from engaging in a modern global marketplace.
CRA is a success story. Between 1993 and 1997, the number of home purchase loans to African Americans soared 62%; Hispanics saw an increase of 58 percent, Asian Americans nearly 30%; and loans to Native Americans increased by 25%
In Congress, we have spent more than twenty years debating how to update the Nation's antiquated banking laws that prohibit banks, securities firms and insurance companies from entering into another's businesses.
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:BbjQwpXE_U...
Reply
-
-
-
0%
bigG1 year ago
That is what I have been telling friends of mine since 2005 - stay liquid and there will be buying opportunities in the near future. A couple of friends actually heeded the advice and waited to purchase homes instead of buying near the peak - now they stand to buy a much nicer home for a good deal less than they could have in 2005.
Reply
-
-
0%
texangelwings1 year ago
A lot of homes were sold over the past 5 years, to people who have lost good paying manufacturing jobs, were un-educated in process of purchasing a home and taken advantage of, so there are still a lot more foreclosures as more jobs are lost! And what are our Representatives doing to stem the tide of foreclosures?....nothing! Another cleanup after Jr. job!
Good article, thanks STONERS!
Reply -
-
0%
nostalgia1 year ago
They will get more than a dime from you - you will be funding the bailout of the mortgage industry with your Federal tax dollars
Reply -
0%
mompro1 year ago
Mortgage companies don't want to admit it is in their best interest to help homeowners stay current or get caught up. But, maybe not. People want to make their payments and keep their homes. I remember years ago when they would allow people deferring a missed payment to the end of the loan as a deferred payment once per year if they were at risk of going over 30 days late on a payment. Someone I knew, in the middle of a divorce was able to do that a few years ago, but no longer. She said the program was removed. Not that it's great, but it would be a solution to some of the homeowner's problems without bailing anyone out.
But i thought the earlier comment about renters losing their apartments put a whole new twist on displaced families. That was a view i hadn't thought of. How horrible to pay rent, which sucks, and then to be thrown out when the landlord gets foreclosed on, especially in buildings with more than one tenant. What a mess.
Reply
-
-
0%
nostalgia1 year ago
The article indicates that "Differences have to be worked out between Dodd's plan, in the Senate, and a similar House proposal by Rep. Frank, D-Mass."
Read what was written about these bills before you take a position
Frank bill:
The Frank bill in the House isn't getting good reviews and may even be worse than the Senate bill
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view...
Dodd bill:
A Pro-Foreclosure Bill
The Senate's housing relief needs repair
We know that legislation can involve a certain amount of moral and intellectual corner-cutting. But is it too much to ask that a bill called the "Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008" not contain a provision that might, at the margin, encourage home foreclosures? Apparently so, because the bipartisan Senate housing relief package includes just such a measure.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...
This was written BEFORE Dood's sweetheart mortgage came to light
Reply -
0%
jordan111 year ago
The fate of those facing foreclosure lies with the Congress, not who will be President. If people want real change, that's where the real hope lies. I doubt Obama will be able to a lot about anything, given the dysfunctional Congress we currently have.
Reply -
0%
Cityslicker1 year ago
Sad , people are losing their homes , but some do because they were told the ARM could get them into a home out of their budget , they bought , now can't afford , and some just plain can't afford because of rising energy and food prices or have lost job because of high energy prices .
The smart S&L , and Energy Racketeers know people are in trouble and yet they make the cost of living go up to prop up the S&L market which causes a fall in Housing and rise in Energy , brilliant .
Saw that the U.S. did a secret mission just yesterday to remove Uranium from Iraq , wait a minute , thought Iraq had no WMDs ?
Reply -
0%
emailkyloe1 year ago
The inherent value of the dollar lies not with "Congress" or the "President", but lands squarely on our own shoulders.
As such, inefficiency of this 'value' may lead one to abscond to the lowest levels of the economic abyss, into intellectual slavery, the very heart of Capitalism, Imperialism and totalitarianism.
Since the apparent demise of the barter system for a vindictively contrived implementation of anew, namely Capitalism, economics became a tool more-ever than an necessity for conglomerates. The expanding liberty of economics dissipates the very entity of liberty for the masses.
What does this mean?
Billion dollar profits(and rising) for the excrescent corporations. Total control of oligarchies, tense economic dictatorship and vehement policing.
Reply-
0%
emailkyloe1 year ago
and so...
It's easy to understand that 'money' has no 'value' outside your actions.
The 'real' value of money comes off your own back; your labour; your intellect; your lives; your children; your willing.
So the question leads to...
What 'value' are you worth to this system...?
Reply
-
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.