« Back to story "Oil's Rapid Rise Stirs Talk of $200 a Barrel This Year"

Story Comments

Posted by: Xaos 1 year, 5 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
Xaos1 year, 5 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

I am all for more drilling. The fact that drilling for oil is not a priority here in the U.S. is one of the big reasons that I have doubted the validity of this 'Oil Supply Crunch'. If there were a genuine supply crunch then we would be drilling everywhere we could and ignoring the environmentalist. If it were a real supply crunch then securing new oil and developing alternate energy sources should be a matter of national security. If that was the case then the environmentalist would have no choice than to keep quiet. Kinda weird how these environmental groups have the resources to tell some of the worlds most wealthy companies where they can and cannot drill for oil.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
4 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  Tangent0011 year, 5 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Oil companies have been sitting on thousands of exploration/drilling leases for years.
  I think if federal lands are opened for drilling, there should be a requirement that any oil so derived goes to the US market. As it stands now, Exxon could drill in ANWR and ship it all off to China.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    buckncindykill1 year, 5 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Most of those leases are not worth exploiting. But yes, every drop of American oil should be available only to Americans. Period.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...
  - libsRfunnyComment removed: Hard Banned1 Reply
    - Neutral
      RichFatCat1 year, 5 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      "I think if federal lands are opened for drilling, there should be a requirement that any oil so derived goes to the US market. As it stands now, Exxon could drill in ANWR and ship it all off to China."
      "I've been saying that for a while now. Same with off-shore drilling or any other production on federal lands/jurisdiction."
      And you, sir, are exactly correct! Why would any business want to sell a product in one area for a fraction of what it will sell for in another? Not only is that idea senseless, it is BAD business. What stockholder group would stand for that!
      We're not afraid of Americans rebelling at the idea of us making fabulous profits from THEIR oil drilled on Federal lands. We pay almost nothing for the leases and enjoy great tax incentives as well.
      We're not afraid because Americans wouldn't believe it anyway. It's too far-fetched to be true!
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...