"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" may go to Supreme Court »
Posted By bubba2 11 months, 3 weeks ago in StyleFederal appeals courts recently have come down on both sides of the controversial "don't ask, don't tell" policy on homosexuals serving in the military, raising the possibility that the Supreme Court might take up the issue.
Read Full Story at armytimes.com »
968 Views Share Story 33 Comments Report
Submitted By:
bubba2
I'm pretty much OUTTA here! The new format (still) S-U-C-K-S!
========
I have a degree in music but that changed to computer systems and I ...
Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 98 (view all)
-
0%
kboy11 months, 3 weeks ago
The problem still is 70 people living in one room and using one bathroom. The other 69 have a right to privacy and should not be subjected to sexual pressure. Change the situation slightly. How would you like to be the only straight person living with 69 gay people? How about being the only female living with 69 men? Ever been uncomfortable being forced to work with a couple that are sexually active? Sex is something that needs to be kept in the bedroom, not in the workplace.
Reply-
0%
Charlson11 months, 3 weeks ago
What alternate universe do you live on? In all communal situations, there is almost always an adjustment or accommodation that must be reached in a society for the group as a whole to function. Sounds more like your fears and uncomfortableness.
Reply -
0%
tkyrchncs11 months, 3 weeks ago
If you are afraid of sharing a bathroom with a group of others, some of whom may be of a different sex or sexual orientation, how will you ever function on a battlefield where there will certainly be people of both genders and every persuasion? If you can't handle someone who MIGHT want to have sex with you and is unlikely in the extreme to do anything about it, how are you going to handle someone who wants to kill you and will try anything to do so?
This is a bogus objection on the face of it.
Reply -
-
0%
hamy11 months, 3 weeks ago
Um...when I go to the gym or camping or anywhere, I am around straight men. I don't "pressure" them sexually. I am respectful just as I would be with a woman. A couple wouldn't need to be sexually active during duty. I would think that they could control themselves.
And, if you think that there aren't gay people serving right now, you are delusional. They are there. They have always been there. And they are controlling themselves.
You are not as hot as you think you are.
Reply -
0%
Natureboy11 months, 3 weeks ago
The U.S. military has a huge problem with heterosexual rape. How much homosexual rape is there?
Perhaps we should have a "no straights allowed" policy for our military.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
Dionys11 months, 3 weeks ago
"Of course a much more important story is the rape and murder of female soldiers serving in the military."
True enough. You know there's something wrong when female soldiers are frightened to use the latrine at night for fear of being raped by their 'brother' soldiers.
Reply -
0%
rightfromwrong11 months, 3 weeks ago
True and one never hears of anyone being charged for that crime. All hushed up like when police shoot an innocent and they just happen to find a gun which was placed there by the officer
Reply
-
-
0%
amazed11 months, 3 weeks ago
"Don't ask, don't tell" is a ridiculous policy as is an outright ban on gays in the military.
Gays have ALWAYS served honorably and ably (although under the radar).
Regardless of whether you agree that homosexuality is just an alternate lifestyle or an abomination or something else entirely, forcing people to keep something like this secret in order to serve just opens the door to blackmail and security risks. Gays in the military are not a security risk because they ARE gay, they are a security risk because they are not allowed to ADMIT that they are gay.
Reply-
0%
buckncindykill11 months, 3 weeks ago
Someone who is more interested in being a "GAY soldier" is more interested in being "GAY" than he is interested in being a "soldier".
Reply
-
-
0%
vizion11 months, 3 weeks ago
This will be an interesting case. I hardly think it has anything to do with reinstating the draft, though.
Reply -
-
0%
newbie042011 months, 3 weeks ago
In the not so distant past I was taing a shower at the gym after working out. There's seven different shower units at my gym (4 on one wall three on the other wall) I was the only one showering at the time and a guy takes the shower directly across and over from me-where he could look right at me.
While I didn't really care that he was staring at me, it did make me feel slightly uncomfortable, less than say a woman would feel if I decided to walk into the womens locker room and took a shower but uncomfortable none the less. Probably not as uncomfortable as a gay guy feels when his fellow soldiers are making gay jokes but stilluncomfortable.
Do we then have 4-5 different showering place (staight men-women, gay men, gay women and transexual) Or do straight people not have the right to feel comfortable taking showers?
So many issues to address but I agree, if you have my back I don't care what you are.
Reply
-
-
AtheismIsRealityComment removed: User banned.5 Replies
-
0%
Hobe11 months, 3 weeks ago
"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" may go to Supreme Court
Is it fair to say, Homosexuals are never treated fairly. If a HoMosexual Man or Women wants to have a private bath in the military, what is the problem?
Why should a Woman want to be or, a Man want to be, be forced to deal with joint private quarter's?
If there were seperate quarters pertaining to each individual needs there would not be the problem of Real men being upset with what his/her fellow group members are thinking.
What has this nation become anyway, Tough Darts?
Reply-
0%
amazed11 months, 3 weeks ago
okay, sure. We'll just make those tents and ships and all three or four times as big to accomodate all these "private quarters" you think are so necessary. We'll make sure to inform any enemy we might be fighting of our increased space needs so that they are sure to accomodate us.
"Real men" as well as "fake men" and "real" and "fake" women who wish to serve in the military just need to learn to suck it up (#1 lesson) and deal with whatever gets thrown at them.
I think that few, if any, gay men are going to go out of their way to hit on straight men (whether they are allowed to "tell" or not) because who needs the grief and aggravation of the appalled reaction of the straight guy to say nothing of the rejection.
It would be just as uncomfortable for the gay guy after a misfired pass as it would be for the straight guy.
Get over it.
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
ZippySpincycle11 months, 3 weeks ago
Good point, tchef--and as a matter of fact, I'm pretty sure that was one of several reasons for the CIA's decision, years ago, to no longer discriminate against gay employees.
I must, however, point out that "venerable" and "vulnerable" are really, really different things... (grin...on the other hand, your typo is nothing compared to one of my students who wrote that after an adolescent run-in with the law, he has since been a "law biting citizen")
Reply
-
-
0%
Poulenc11 months, 3 weeks ago
Of course gays should serve without having to hide their sexual nature.
One of the horrors of "don't ask" is that it enshrines gayness as "dirty secret"--the closet position. Of course, it also makes gay men and women vulnerable.
It's idiotic to contend that straight men are somehow at a disadvantage in the presence of gay men in close quarters. If anything, gay men have learned over time, for reasons of self-protection, to strictly inhibit expressions of potentially unwanted sexual attention.
Mostly, though, the notion of inevitable gay-straight conflict is bogus, an invention of the puritanical and/or homophobic.
Finally, one's sexuality is nobody's damn business!
Reply -
0%
Will131311 months, 3 weeks ago
Backward as much of our society is about sexuality.. I believe that many gay's would be in almost as much danger from there "brother's in arms" as from the enemy....
gays in civilian life face danger from homophobes.. why would the military be any different..and those guys are armed...
that being said...
i don't care as long as we are shooting at the same people.. join right in white, black, gay, straight, green or purple.. you got my back.. I've got yours...
Reply-
0%
Natureboy11 months, 3 weeks ago
"i don't care as long as we are shooting at the same people.. join right in white, black, gay, straight, green or purple.. you got my back.. I've got yours...
Absent a compelling cause for doing so, I would like us to stop shooting.
So maybe I should say I do NOT support gays in the military; I do not support straights in the military either.
Reply
-
-
0%
Harbeas11 months, 3 weeks ago
If someone wants to tell the world they are gay, they have that right and should not be discriminated against for it.
Reply -
0%
raats666211 months, 3 weeks ago
It wasn't that long ago that the same arguments used to ban gays from openly serving (degrade unit cohesion, lower morale and reduce order and discipline) were the EXACT same arguments used to keep WOMEN from serving and African American from serving.
There are STILL service member who have problems (and there always will be) servicing with women and Blacks, but that doesn't mean that morale has suffered or discipline has suffered.
And as for the soldiers worried about 'a gay soldier checking them out'. They are probably the SAME soldiers that spend their time openly 'checking out' female service member and perhaps going further to grab, brush or intimidate them into uncomfortable feelings. As is usually the case....they can dish it out, but they can't take it!
Reply-
0%
alakazam11 months, 3 weeks ago
I suppose there are no "BULL" Gays then?
I think you will find as many different sexualities as there are individuals.
I don't see what the issue has to do with military service.
Do they want legally recognized marriages to each other and base housing?
What means "openly"
Reply
-
-
0%
jordan1111 months, 3 weeks ago
The first man seriously injured in Iraq is gay. He was a Marine who came out after he came home....without his leg. Here's his story on 'don't ask don't tell.'
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/28/alva-dont-ask/
Reply -
0%
unome211 months, 3 weeks ago
I'm always surprised that there are people willing to go to a foreign country and kill people, gay or straight.
Reply -
0%
Poulenc11 months, 3 weeks ago
Yes, unome, I sometimes ask myself what it would take ME to go to war.
A great deal, is the answer.
Certainly more, much more than having George Bush declare that the leader of Iraq must be removed for all the putative reasons given.
Reply -
-
0%
ZippySpincycle11 months, 3 weeks ago
Did you notice that in the good old days, when members of the military were found out to be gay, they were usually given dishonorable discharges and had their career ruined? Gosh, that worked out so well for everybody...oh, yeah, except the people most directly affected by it. "Keeping quiet" was no guarantee at all; gays in the military had to depend solely on the willingness of superiors and comrades to not lower the boom.
Hey, remember how the darkies were all happy with segregation until those Outside Agitators started making an issue of it?
Reply
-
-
0%
alakazam11 months, 3 weeks ago
I am gonna go out on a limb here.
What I really think about it, my personal opinion of this thing.
I think a Soldier or Warrior should be a Man's Man regardless of his sexual orientation. Same for the Ladies of course, I guess you would call that a Ladies Lady.
Is that not part of their Duty?
I think the people who have actually served somewhere know what I am talking about.
Military Duty in a firm Military Mind, isn't that what makes a Soldier?
Spend a couple of months underway on a submarine and tell me about learning to deal with people and getting along.
Do I want to listen to people humping in the bunk above me? Not Particularly, I don't care what their sexes are.
It's a White Elephant.
Reply -
mackiemesserComment removed: User banned.5 Replies
-
kenpowerComment removed: User banned.
-
0%
Poulenc11 months, 3 weeks ago
Bill, above: the reason that gays make (or made) an "issue" of being gay is that the can be denied the right to serve on the basis of sexual preference. Gays could--and can--be discharged for that reason. Not exactly fair, right?
And Alak: I'm not sure what you mean by a "man's man," although it has an ironic, probably unwanted homoeroticism to it.
To subscribe to the notion that gays must somehow meet a "maleness" test, which in fact all male soldiers must (putting aside for now what that might actually BE), is to imply that gays in particular MIGHTN'T.
Which means you'd be falling for very dusty stereotypes of what gay men are.
Reply -
0%
Poulenc11 months, 3 weeks ago
Condi, above, every marginalized and/or unjustifiably despised group must go through a period in which they assert their identity to be recognized and (hopefully) accepted for who they are.
Gay people have made great strides in the last twenty years or so--but there's still work to be done.
When homophobia is no longer an issue, or has decreased to a very, very dull roar, there'll be less need for the kind of "advertising" you reject.
Reply-
0%
Codi693411 months, 3 weeks ago
It has more to do with religion, less to do with homophobia. This is a nation of believers, like it or not. And if you are judged by your work/action etc. Your sex life will be less of an issue. The more you put it in peoples faces, the more others will look at your "advertisment" and not what you have accomplished.
Side note: phobia is a fear of... It isn't that people are afraid of being around homosexuals. They just don't want to around them or there lifestyle. Do you like everyone that you are around/meet? Is that a phobia? Or do you choose not to be around them because for whatever reason you don't like them ,there lifestyle or the way they act?
Reply
-
More News
FanHouse
Sahel Kazemi Recently Purchased Gun, Police Tell Relative
Eddie Chambers Destroys Alexander Dimitrenko, Wins by Majority Decision
Tribune Company Finally Reaches Deal To Sell the Cubs
Steve McNair's Tragic End Shouldn't Tarnish His Legacy
Wanderlei Silva on Franklin Loss, Griffin vs. Anderson and Fedor in the UFC
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.