Story Comments
Posted by: AntiNeoCon 1 year, 4 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
-
-
Neutral
antibrainwasher1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
SAMFORD: top McSenile VP pick
BLITZER: Are there any significant economic differences between what the Bush administration has put forward over these many years as opposed to now what John McCain supports?
SANFORD: Um, yeah. For instance, take, you know, take, for instance, the issue of -- I'm drawing a blank, and I hate it when I do that, particularly on television. Take, for instance the contrast on NAFTA. I mean, I think that the bigger issue is credibility in where one is coming from, are they consistent where they come from.
Sanford finally came up with an answer -- McCain has opposed earmarks while President Bush hasn't -- but Blitzer twisted the knife a bit further, following up on Sanford's initial mention of NAFTA. "He's a huge supporter of free trade, John McCain, the Bush administration supports free trade. I don't see a big difference."
Sanford said he was going to make a separate point about consistency
Reply-
Neutral
MRCOFFEECAKE1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It's either Sanford or Quayle! (both genius lock steppers)
How about a McCain/Helms ticket?
Oh, that's right, he has more living brain cells than most of them, but he's dead..
How about the Senator from Idaho?? He can bring in the gay vote and the air traveler vote while campaigning heavily in airport rest rooms.
Reply
-
-
-
Neutral
SFCGuyW1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wrong - if one is to be knowledgeable on a news subject one must look at all views and takes on the subject. That means listening to the Liberal, Conservative and neutral news outlets. However, those who solely go to Fox for their news are being bombarded with many false facts, misquotes and far right ideals.
Reply-
Neutral
mesodude1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"However, those who solely go to Fox for their news are being bombarded with many false facts, misquotes and far right ideals."
--Because they gravitate towards "news" sources which reflect what they already believe. That's why they're terrified of the Fairness Doctrine. They're worried that even *hearing* an opposing point of view will poison their already fragile ability to think for themselves. ;-(
Reply
-
-
loading ...
joey-evans
cushi
tchef
miklkit
ConquerorWyrm
bubba2
GHOSTWHOWALKS
djn3nunez3
Goppy
Will1313
Beeboppin71
mesodude
Blackacereturn
baddad59
bluetexasvalley
TLovesTeddy
NoSpinDave
protoham
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.