« Back to story "Mass. Senate votes to let out-of-state gays marry "

Story Comments

Posted by: Charlson 1 year, 4 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
Charlson1 year, 4 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

What the hell are you talking about? Equating acceptance of gay marriage to a throat slasher is the height of stupidity.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
19 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  tkyrchncs1 year, 4 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  And equating the actions of one judge in a criminal case to the deliberated act of an American legislature is absurd.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...
- Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive17 Replies
  - Neutral
    hamy1 year, 4 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    You focus so much on the sexual acts rather than what is really at stake here.
    And besides, vaginas are gross. How you could ever go anywhere near one without gagging shocks me. The last one I saw, I was being pulled away from by a doctor.
    There. See? Equal.
    And you can't tell me that you have NEVER "accidentally" slipped into a girls back door. So lay off the sex stuff, unless your disgust truly does mask a hidden desire as every psychologist worth their salt has stated.
    Enjoy living in ignorance.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    5 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive4 Replies
      - Neutral
        ZippySpincycle1 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        "What the hell are you talking about. Marriage is about the sex."
        Wow. I think you've just told us a lot more about yourself than about marriage.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        DropkickaLib1 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        This from a new divorcee!
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive
      - Neutral
        hamy1 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        I really feel sorry for your spouse either current or future. All she or he means to you is sex. Why didn't you just marry a sex toy? Seems you could derive the same pleasure and not had to pay for your spouse's food or medical costs.
        Oh, and you still didn't answer any of my questions. All you did was spout a bigoted rant.
        And sodomy includes aural* sex in it's legal definition so if you have ever engaged in aural* sex with a woman or a man, you are guilty of sodomy as well. Aren't you glad that thanks to gay people and their legal fight for equality you can't be arrested for it anymore. God bless us everyone!
        
        Get off your high horse, it's got the munchies.
        *oral was blocked.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
  - Neutral
    Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    "Inserting your penis in another man's ass ranks up there."
    Then I suggest you don't do it. Your personal repugnance for the act is no justification for making it illegal.
    But at least we've arrived at the crux of the issue. You find homosexuality personally bothersome, perhaps your religion also supports that notion. How is that any different from the anti-misogenation laws of the past that forbade inter-racial marriage?
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    9 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - Neutral
      DropkickaLib1 year, 4 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Because the Bible actually forbids homosexuality but not inter racial marriage.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      6 Replies
      
      loading ...
      - Neutral
        Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        The Bible forbids eating shellfish too. Oh, and not everyone is Christian.
        Believe it or not, the Bible has been used to justify segregation, even to this day:
        "The Apostle Paul: Acts 17:24-28 says that God made man "and hath determined the bounds of their habitation." Genesis 28:1, says that the Canaanites (blacks) were the "servants of servants" and Isaac called Jacob and said unto him, "Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.""
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
      - Neutral
        ZippySpincycle1 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        "Because the Bible actually forbids homosexuality but not inter racial marriage."
        I'm sorry, Drop, which article of the Constitution states that the Book of Leviticus is US law?
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        4 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        DropkickaLib1 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Nice try at confusing the issue. My point was that there clearly is a Biblical basis for banning homosexual marriage but not inter-racial marriage.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        3 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Did you miss my post? "Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan."
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        2 Replies
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        DropkickaLib1 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        That didn't refer to people of another race, they were all Semites, but rather people of a different religion.
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 11) (recursion depth : 8) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        1 Reply
        
        loading ...
        
        Neutral
        Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        That is your interpretation. White supremacist organizations use that verse to support their notions of misogenation. The verse WAS used in the past as well as 'clearly banning interracial marriage'.
        To your point, if that verse of the Bible forbids inter-faith marriage, shouldn't THAT be against the law?
        The Bible forbids LOTS of things that somehow haven't made it into US law books
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 12) (recursion depth : 9) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
    - Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive1 Reply
      - Neutral
        Charlson1 year, 4 months ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        Well your views matches your behavior. Nice!
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...
  - Neutral
    ZippySpincycle1 year, 4 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    "Inserting your penis in another man's ass ranks up there."
    I dunno, I don't think it's nearly as bad as how you've inserted your head up your own ass...
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...