« Back to story "Mass. Senate votes to let out-of-state gays marry "

Story Comments

Posted by: hamy 1 year, 4 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Neutral
hamy1 year, 4 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

This isn't about overturning a Constitutional Amendment. You are the one who is talking about using a Constitutional Amendment to DENY rights to people instead of GRANT them which is the point of the Constitution in the first place.
Circle speak again. Do you even read what you type?

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
2 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  To further bolster your point: The Constitution is not about granting rights at all. Rights are ASSUMED. The Constitution specifically prevents inherent rights from being infringed upon. It doesn't even give the full list of all our rights.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  1 Reply
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    KazamaSmokers1 year, 4 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    You know... if you listen quietly, you can actually hear Dropkick getting owned.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 10) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...