« Back to story "Ad Hawk: Bon Voyage, Barack! (McCain Airs First Negative Ad While Obama Is Away)"

Story Comments

Posted by: Global_Warmer 1 year, 3 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive5 Replies
- Neutral
  tchef1 year, 3 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  No, we want to bring them home. Which is much better than leaving them there. Continuing to fund this endless operation with borrowed money is saying f*ck the troops.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  4 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive3 Replies
    - Neutral
      ybdogsct1 year, 3 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      GLOBALWARMER:
      "So, I assume you agree with with Obama with his sentiment: F*ck the troops?"
      You obviously were either too lazy, too illiterate, or too inept (or maybe all 3!) to finish reading the rest of the article.
      LOL.
      FROM THE ARTICLE:
      "In the new negative ad which will run in battleground states while Obama is abroad, McCain accuses Obama of 'voting against funding our troops,' but McCain himself 'voted against funding our troops' when he voted against legislation that would have provided funds for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and directed more than $1 billion to the Department of Veterans Affairs, as well as other legislation funding care for veterans."
      Literacy - it's a wonderful thing. You should try it sometime.
      LOL.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
    - Neutral
      tchef1 year, 3 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Well let's see, if we attached a timetable for a withdrawal to the funding bill, Bush will veto it, so he would effectively be doing exactly what you say (cut off supplies and ammunition). So what makes his action any different?
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - Global_WarmerComment removed: Abusive