Story Comments
Posted by: mivan4 1 year, 5 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
Neutral
mivan41 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Timing folks, when Obama was advocating this the timing was wrong. Now after the SURGE, conditions are different. NOTICE the quassi time table that Bush set up with Maliki is dependent on how things are going on the ground and can be modified as needed. Maliki is in complete agreement with the depending on how things are going statement and Indicated so in his speech!
Reply-
Neutral
tchef1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Timing BS! If they would have not invaded Iraq in the first place we wouldn't even be talking about withdrawal. We should have finished the job in Afghanistan. Osama is still running free, why?
Not to mention if we would have invaded Iraq with enough troops to have properly secured the place it may not have become such a mess. The surge was 4 years too late. How's that for timing.
Reply -
Neutral
ybdogsct1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
MIVAN:
"NOTICE the quassi time table that Bush set up with Maliki"
Bush was ADAMANTLY opposed to timetables just several days ago. He only RELUCTANTLY acquiesced when al-Maliki refused to budge on the issue.
I find it laughable just how much Bush apologists need to contort their position to justify Bush's and McCain's flip-flopping. First, it was flip-flopping on talks with Iran. Now, it's flip-flopping on setting timelines for troop redeployment in Iraq.
What's next?
LOL.
Reply
-
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?
Aidenag
BillieMaxer
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.