Story Comments
Posted by: ybdogsct 1 year, 5 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
Neutral
ybdogsct1 year, 5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It ยป
The lasting legacy of Bush's leadership of Texas is remarkably similar to what he has done as President. Namely, appointing a string of unqualified people to positions of power and engaging in one sweetheart deal after another to further line the coffers of his biggest campaign contributors.
So, let's take a look at the qualifications of George W. Bush to become President. A one term Governor of Texas. A string of failures in the business world. An admitted recovering alcoholic.
On the other hand, Barack Obama was an Illinois State Senator for eight years and has been a US Senator since 2005. In other words, without any qualifications, George W. Bush sought to become the chief executive first of a large state and then the entire country, while Barack Obama has worked in the legislative realm in which people who say no to you don't get fired. Barack Obama is learning the process of government, while George Bush learned only that people ask high how when you say jump."
Reply
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.