Comments for Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed to Cuba »
Posted By TechnologyExpert 1 year, 4 months ago in NewsRussian bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons could be deployed to Cuba in response to U.S. plans to install a missile defense system in Eastern Europe, a Russian newspaper reported Monday, citing an unnamed senior Russian air force official.
Read Full Story at washingtonpost.com »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 35 of 36 Comments
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive2 Replies
-
80%
bigurn1 year, 4 months ago
-
Luis-CiferComment removed: Abusive
-
100%
gamahuche1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I had the same thought immediately PHB.
Reply
A real trip down memory lane..
The first political activity I was involved in as main organiser..
Nothing surprising about this at all. Spheres of influence. The US stomped on what the Russians believe is theirs in Europe and probably correctly surmised that the US would be keeping an eye on them. This is the obvious response.
It will get worse before it gets better; it will be a huge test for the new US President. -
100%
jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Cuba is minutes from Florida. Russia sees itself as losing it's competitive edge as a deterrent to the American military. It looks like "grandstanding" because we are deploying those missile shields close to their borders. Let's see if someone calls their bluff.
Reply -
-
-
-
67%
Teech1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Old, relatively slow, easy to detect and shoot down bombers are different from missiles.
I can't see the young president of Russia deploying OFFENSIVE hardware to counter radar which is DEFENSIVE. Unless, of course, there's more to this than we are being told.
I hope history doesn't really repeat itself.
Reply -
70%
Teech1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
A more dangerous threat is Dumbya asking, "Hey, what's in that briefcase you guys are always carrying around?"
The most dangerous threat to the free world is even considering McInsane as a President, because he KNOWS what's in that case.
Reply -
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive1 Reply
-
-
-
83%
drpolyphemus1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It isn't missile shields silly. It is MISSILES. Bush wants to put missiles in the Russian backyard. Russia's response is to hint through un-named sources that they might just do the same.
BTW I hate the new Propellor look and function.
Reply -
86%
Teech1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
PHB: Cuba turning to the U.S. for help would be something! Talk about making history!
Question is, what would the Bush Admin do?
Allowing American tourists unrestricted access to Cuba would go a long way in warming relations and would be a boon for Cubans.
Reply -
HanymanComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
-
AtheismIsRealityComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
0%
nikkibabe1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It is not WE installing a missile shield. It is Bush, the war monger with itching fingers to trigger conflicts that is doing.
God willing if there is a Democratic President in 2009, he should cancel everything and let Europeans protect themselves. Who would they protect themselves from?
Reply -
67%
Mdiar1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Who would they protect themselves from?"
Reply
To pretend as if Europe has made no enemies over two centuries of imperialism is naive. By the same token the idea of a missile shield is idiotic and Europeans are certainly capable of protecting themselves from outside forces when they are united as a single force. Unfortunately, the EU will just be another imperialistic force in fifty years or so if it ever gets off the ground. -
100%
BB641 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This would violate the agreement the US and USSR signed concerning the Cuba. The US would consider this an act or near act of war. You would see our "retired" weapons systems such as the MX, F117 and Pershing II; ungraded and redeployed. While the Russians are flush with cash, their technology is still yesterdays. In fact, the FSS, replacement for the KGB, there are now as many or more Russian spies in the field. Once again trying to steal what they can't build. It is very much like the Cold War all over again.
Reply -
50%
unome21 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
We have corporate war profiteers in charge of the Whitehouse. They constantly fan the flames of war and mistrust in an effort to enrich themselves and their friends.
Reply
Bush ,Cheney and their neo-con friends represent the very worst of humanity.
America can and should do better. -
-
-
-
100%
minorman1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
it's only fair for them to. the only reason why the U.S. (us) would build a missle defence system in europe would be solely for the benefit of the companies who build them. LETS WASTE TAX PAYER MONEY ON MORE WEAPONS. DON'T THEY MAKE ENOUGH MONEY MAKING WEAPONS FOR THE CURRENT WAR. War is good for weapon suppliers. The europe project will be on the standby in case the current war ends. Big money corporate america ownes congress!!! So does the Oil Corporations.
Reply
The weapon suppliers hire ex military leaders and ex political people to get contracts from the govt. They will use the news media to scare us into thinking that our national security is threathened.
Talk about tax payer money wasted. Talk about HOME LAND SECURITY. What a waste. But look who runs it. Congress.
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.