« Back to story "Criticizing Propeller.com is against its TOS. duh!"

Story Comments

Posted by: gamahuche 1 year, 3 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 96%
    gamahuche1 year, 3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Well now they've got you buried on page 32.
    I actually reached it by going through all the pages..
    Are these guys NUTS or what???
    In my 13 years on the Internet I have almost never seen such a dog's bollocks of a mess.
    They had something absolutely brilliant going - not flawless but some OUTSTANDING contributors, with some murky ones thrown in for good measure but THIS is SH**

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    7 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      gamahuche1 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Well now they've got you buried on page 32.
      I actually reached it by going through all the pages..
      Are these guys NUTS or what???
      In my 13 years on the Internet I have almost never seen such a dog's bollocks of a mess.
      They had something absolutely brilliant going - not flawless but some OUTSTANDING contributors, with some murky ones thrown in for good measure but THIS is SH**

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        splitrch1 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        makes you wonder what passes for brains these days. "propeller" - I think they got their heads in anatomically impossible positions.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Natureboy1 year, 3 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          The medical term is cephalorectal impaction .

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...

        Post Reply

        You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

        People Who Liked This Comment (24)

        People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)