McCain Questions Obama's Foreign Speech, Forgets His Own »
Posted By Neophile 2 months, 2 weeks ago in News
In his interview with NBC's Kelly O'Donnell, which will air on NBC's Nightly News tonight, McCain questions whether Obama should have given a speech in Berlin before becoming president. However, on June 20, McCain himself gave a speech in Canada.
Read Full Story at firstread.msnbc.msn.com »
Submitted By:
Neophile
I'm a Propeller Scout so if you have any questions or concerns, send me a message and I'll be happy to help.
Also submitted:
Related Articles:
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 79
-
-
-
-
-
NemoShiZniTComment removed: User banned.
-
NemoShiZniTComment removed: User banned.2 Replies
-
0%
Blackacereturn2 months, 2 weeks ago
This is typical republican antics (I get to do and you are damned if you try to do)
Reply
-
-
-
-
100%
toph19732 months, 2 weeks ago
Geez, it's been a while since you've been on here FSU. Finally able to figure out the password after mommy changed it?
Reply -
100%
tkyrchncs2 months, 2 weeks ago
Well, well. It finally happened. I agree. To hell with Osama. However, you need to be prepared for the Presidency of Senator Barack Hussein Obama.
Reply
-
-
-
100%
raats66622 months, 2 weeks ago
You know, I REALLY get a kick out of the people who bring up the '57 states 'especially since they are USUALLY the same people who start SCREAMING when McCain's '100 year in Iraq' are brought up. Then when you ADD that most Obama supporters at lease acknowledge that he did say it (unlike the McCain's who say he DIDN'T say the 100 years) it gets even funnier.
According to you "must have been hitting the acid a little hard." So what EXACTLY was McCain smoking when he said (not ONCE)
1) Czechoslovakia should reevaluate who they make deals with (said twice) OR
2) The Shi'as in Iran were supporting the Sunni's of al-Qaeda (said 4 times in 5 days while IN the Middle East) OR
3) That the Iraq/Pakistan boarder needs to be controlled (you do know that Iraq's boarder is 700 miles FROM Pakistan....right?) OR
4) That the war in Iraq, as the first major conflict since the attacks of 9/11, can not be lost - you do know that the war in Afghanistan was "the first major conflict since 9/11" - don't you?But my favorite "but I do like Cindy. A very nice lady." That wouldn't be ......drug user, embezzler THAT Cindy McCain? The same Cindy McCain who committed those crimes while a WIFE of a US Senator.....THAT Cindy McCain?
Reply-
0%
Blackacereturn2 months, 2 weeks ago
You should mean McCain but i don't a GOPer to get it right
Reply
-
-
86%
TrueProgressive2 months, 2 weeks ago
Neo, by November, McBush will be lucky to recall what he had for breakfast that morning.
Reply
-
-
100%
raats66622 months, 2 weeks ago
And let's not forget "As to the surge, I supported it but I can't tell you when it started and my wife is over there."
If that is true then you and McCain are the ONLY ones.
Until McCain tried to dig himself out of the hole he was in (because of that days verbal blunder) no one (Bush, Petraeus, Cheney AND McCain) EVER suggested or implied that the 'surge' did not start until January 2007 when Bush first started suggesting a escalation of troops.
BTW- Why don't you (and McCain) get out a dictionary and look up 'surge'? EVERY definition says increase, forward, upward, rise. NO WHERE does it suggest that 'clear & hold', 'strategy' would constitute a 'surge'. NOTHING, except the INCREASE of troops (in anyones mind EXCEPT McCain) would constitute a 'surge'.
Reply -
-
17%
FSU92grad2 months, 2 weeks ago
Yes and where would Osama be without his teleprompter?
You libs have some audacity to point out Bush and McCain's slip ups when you're "golden boy" rock star has had plenty of "uh...uh.....well....uh..." during many interviews...
Do I need to list some examples so you can shut your pie hole? I believe I can find a few MP3's if you'd like....
Reply -
38%
BB642 months, 2 weeks ago
Guys, with a guy like Obama, you're going to talk? He claims to have visited all 57 states, must have been hitting the acid a little hard. Had a friend over to his home that went to prison for blowing up an FBI building. Funny, they executed McVeigh for that. As to the surge, I supported it but I can't tell you when it started and my wife is over there.
I think it's time to really talk about the candidates. Obama has less experience than Dan Quayle yet you folks are all over this guy. What has he actually done? I've tried searching this out but all I've been able to find are puff pieces on how he supports the people and is a friend of the people. What people? The poor of his community? They've gotten poorer since he's been in office, both state and federal. His social activism, I can't find what he's done. Where are the shelter's he's built? Where are the soup kitchens he's funded? Where are the school's he's built? Where is a child he's taken in and adopted? Nothing. Can't find a single case. Perhaps it's not properly marked on line but I think if it existed, he'd have it available.
McCain has done all of this. I'm not a fan of John's, but I do like Cindy. A very nice lady. Again, what has Barack done?
Reply-
0%
ABANOCLA2 months, 2 weeks ago
He was to busy getting all his "experience" to have done any of that, I believe if you check, you will find that the Senate was actually in session 143 days, with Obama, involved or not, depending how you look at it. !43 days of session, and he starts his exploratory commission to see if he should run for POTUS..A whole lot of experience he brings..
Reply -
0%
BB642 months, 2 weeks ago
What was the date Einstein? Without googling it.
On the term surge, that's a marketing term. There was a short term redeployment of additional troops to help maintain and gain control of the entire country. With the help of the Iraqi people, it's succeeded. All sides had to work together.
Reply
-
-
80%
TrueProgressive2 months, 2 weeks ago
Obama has accomplished something no other person of color has gotten close to, securing the nomination to be President of the United States. What's McBush's greatest accomplishment? Dumping his loyal wife for rich hottie Cindy. Maybe that makes McBush presidential material for the penis-challenged like BB and other similar regressives here. But the indisputable fact is that our only rational, functional choice for president is between two individuals, Obama and McBush. The first is filled with vibrant energy, and casts a striking contrast to the current monkey brained degenerate. The latter is an almost senile replication of said monkey brained degenerate. Only a brain and penis challenged regressive would even suggest this "choice" is anything but "no-brainer."
Reply
-
-
-
25%
FSU92grad2 months, 2 weeks ago
Peech,
Lame ? Please check your pathetic candidate before you start spreading your lies....He has done nothing, brings nothing to the table and offers no solutions...He's a fake and a fraud and you're just as ignorant wanting to vote for this loser....
I guess picking the leader of this great country means NOTHING to you....If it did, you would know better than to vote for Osama....Hillary I could see...Osama doesn't make sense to anyone except you and 200,000 germans who showed up mostly for the rock show....
Reply
-
-
cherry123Comment removed: User banned.
-
93%
Mdiar2 months, 2 weeks ago
I thought the speech was alright... not amazing. I think the German reaction to the speech can help combat the feeling in the United States right now that everyone hates the United States... they hate Bush. That's a big difference and most of the US hates/disapproves of Bush as well if his approval rating is an indication.
Reply-
88%
ecotourusa2 months, 2 weeks ago
PRE-IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS:
Reply
http://noliesradio.org/
House Judiciary Committee Hearing on Kucinich Impeachment Resolution.
Conyers tries to censor the hearing before it starts!
LIVE BROADCAST: Friday, July 25th at 6am Pacific - 9am Eastern - 13:00 GMT
Repeat broadcast: Saturday, July 26th at 9am Pacific - 12 noon Eastern - 16:00 GMT
Watch for archive version here after the broadcasts.-
33%
BB642 months, 2 weeks ago
Sure, they can waste more time on things that don't matter anymore yet we can't get them Dems to vote up or down on drilling. Now I know some of you geniuses will claim it will take 10 years but had Billy Bob Clinton supported drilling, we wouldn't be as controlled by the Opec oil nations. That was 10 years ago.
Tell congress to ignore Bush and actually do the people's bidding. Oil is to costly, corn is a joke, let's start converting coal to gasoline, we would have over 100 years to develop a better solution and save tons of money. But again, getting the DNC congress to do their jobs is asking them too much. Non binding resolutions and tax increases are about all they can really handle. Just like in the late 70's when when had the house, senate, courts and the white house. Noting good got done.
Reply
-
-
-
100%
raats66622 months, 1 week ago
You know, you REALLY loose ALL credibility when you start making sh!t up.
While it IS true that Ethanol is NOT a viable solution (to reduce our dependence of foreign oil) bio diesel certainly IS. Since contrary to your stupid comment "bio diesel require somewhere around 5 gallons of fossil fuel to produce on gallon. 5 to 1 loss, only liberals feel that's a great deal." Bio diesel requires NO fossil fuel.
And as for your comment "Disrespect him and the office you disrespect the American people."
He did that himself when he chose to IGNORE the oath he took when he was sworn in as President. The only oath BTW which is specifically outlined in the Constitution. The oath taken by EVERY OTHER PERSON who represents the US Government is a different oath then that of the President and only the oath taken by the President is dictated in the US Constitution.
The wording is prescribed by the Constitution (Article II, Section 1, Clause 8), as follows:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Reply
-
-
-
90%
Charlson2 months, 2 weeks ago
In order to garner the media attention, McBush must attack. Untrue or distorted, illogical smears is one way but if you can't stay on message it won't stick. Everytime he speaks, it's a different story because he gets his facts wrong half of the time (I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt) and instead of admitting to making gaffes, he has to invent more misfacts to explain his mistakes. Just like the guy he's cloned from...Bush.
Reply -
90%
GWHayduke2 months, 2 weeks ago
Its funny listening to the criticism of Obama's speeches!
McCain's forte is 'The Surge', a subject he knows very little about and attributes any iota of success in Iraq to the idea of a surge. Hilarious.
He is a one trick pony, well, at least he has more tricks than Bush, that must be why the 15%ers support him - CHANGE! More hilarity.
Reply -
88%
Tcaros2 months, 2 weeks ago
McCain baerely gets his sentences right. He's starting to show early signs of a disoriented senior.
I hope he chooses Guliani as his running mate. They can share geritol moments on the way to the "big loss."
Reply -
-
0%
FSU92grad2 months, 2 weeks ago
funny...I was thinking the same thing about you libs voting for a no substance candidate like Osama...
Reply -
-
100%
toph19732 months, 2 weeks ago
Hmm, isn't Osama still at large in Pakistan. Because Bush isn't even looking for him? Bush is still trying to find the WMD's in Iraq. It's typical that you would vote for someone with mental Problems like McCain, when you voted for a Schizophrenic into office that thinks he talks to god.
I see the word credibility has no meaning to you.
Reply -
100%
quackpot2 months, 2 weeks ago
WRONG one again, FSU.
A candidate who has, in part by his reception in Germany, demonstrated a solid ability to repair the isolationist and dictatorial policies of the Bush Administration. is NOT a no-substance candidate.
Since I am also typing impaired, I won't comment on the typo that you made regarding Mr. Obama's name.
Reply
-
-
-
80%
raats66622 months, 2 weeks ago
He is a one trick pony,
~~~~~~~~~
Hey, that's MY line!Sadly, he's starting to prove that he doesn't even have THAT!
Reply -
100%
carmouche372 months, 2 weeks ago
Alhiemers is kicking in with McCain, lil crippled dude don't no his own wrongs but is quick<-- no Pun intended...to point out others...a so-called heroe that killed more American lives in one day than all of the Viet Congs.
Reply -
NemoShiZniTComment removed: User banned.1 Reply
-
100%
ConsAreNonGrata2 months, 2 weeks ago
Let's keep a running tally between who makes the most gaffes between Obama and McBush. Whoever has the least can be President.
That would be another way for Obama to win.
The only way for McBush to win would be a Diebold victory.
Reply
Add a Comment
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.