Story Comments
Posted by: Natureboy 1 year, 3 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
79%
Natureboy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"They're deleting "reviews" by people who haven't read the book and who are using the review page as a forum to voice their dogmatic approach to "reading" -- read what someone else says about it, despite their lies, and decide without reading it yourself."
Reply
Such was my surmise - plenty of one-star reviews left unmolested, including one by a guy who conceded he hadn't read the book.
When I read book reviews, I am interested in a critique of the book and itst content - but I get the picture that the deleted reviews were on the order of "Nancy sux" without any input on the book itself. If such is the case, it points to trolling and abuse of process and such comments SHOULD be deleted.
OTOH, maybe Amazon went to a great deal of trouble to delete some one star reviews, leave others, all for the dubious benefit of raising a rating from one star to two. I doubt it.-
71%
vor1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Finally, a functioning synapse! This is like a Rush Limbaugh argument. There is really nothing there but if you artfully spin this nothing you can create the idea of impropriety. Not actual impropriety just the insinuation. That is enough to get FSU Grad or AG stirred up. It's the way they are used to thinking. The hatred rises quickly. May the great FSM forgive them!
Reply
-
loading ...
brettodactyl
Ciera-Marie
Ratskii
vor
german-shepard
Klarissa
hamy
ind06
dadesider
fsev41
mesodude
GWHayduke
TLovesTeddy
NashuaNan
AuntT
FSU92grad
AlphaGnosis
DropkickaLib
Nixie
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.