Comments for Paris Hilton Responds to McCain Ad »
Posted By Neophile 1 year, 3 months ago in HumorAn ad for The Paris Hilton Presidential Campaign.
Read Full Story at funnyordie.com »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 200
-
13%
KYRed1 year, 3 months ago
-
70%
toph19731 year, 3 months ago
-
20%
DropkickaLib1 year, 3 months ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
Lurch1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This is a disgusting topic, but since you started it.
Reply
I would bet your annual salary that Paris has cleaner genitals than Johnny "Cum Lobby Me Anytime" McCain.
Oh, and the Republican lifestyle of anonymous random same-sex intercourse in airport bathrooms is supposed to be the ideal?
-
-
-
50%
barbara9x1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
_________________________...
Reply
damn, the last vid is most hilarious, watch it here:
http://video.cnn08.com/?v=Paris_Hilton_Responds
_________________________... -
-
fistokerComment removed: Spam
-
-
-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user1 Reply
-
-
-
-
-
83%
lfergie8121 year, 3 months ago
-
18%
DropkickaLib1 year, 3 months ago
-
-
88%
vor1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You do realize that some 70% of stories about Obama on all press outlets have been negative. He is getting more coverage than McCain but most of it is negative. Clearly this is not helping. You do realize that the networks are owned by massive corporations who really do not want to see Obama in office. You can shriek about media bias all you want but the realities, as usual, do not reflect your beliefs.
Reply-
10%
DropkickaLib1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
In actuality the reporters and editors responsible for news stories are overwhelmingly leftist in orientation as a number of surveys have demonstrated. Rupert Murdoch isn't writing his own stories. Nce try at disinformation, as usual.
Reply-
-
Neutral
Lurch1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Murdoch not only holds the purse strings and signs the paychecks, he controls the people who control the message. That is why all, or all the ones I know about, have the same RW bias.
Reply
You think that bias could be random?
Gimme a break.
-
-
-
20%
MajJohn1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You're correct, most of the stories are negative about Obama and he gets more coverage. The press likes to report negative things no matter what the topic. Now as to the news corporation owners not wanting to see Obama get elected because of bias, that's a stretch! Maybe the negative things reported about Obama is simply a reflection of Obama's beliefs not being in touch w/ the voters, not some conspiracy. That is why Obama is "fine tuning some of his positions on drilling for oil, too much bad press. This is a good thing. The press should reflect public opinion.
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
-
mntnman444Comment removed: Spammer, Hard Banned3 Replies
-
-
-
42%
slate1 year, 3 months ago
-
AbuAmirahComment removed: Spammer, Hard Banned18 Replies
-
-
-
30%
lovemylibs1 year, 3 months ago
-
-
31%
slate1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That doesn't matter, I think she did a great job, she even did a dig of herself with the 'it's hot' part.
Reply
But in the end, she and the left still worship the rock star that would be president, there in no doubt about that, and the only thing they have on McCain is wow he sure is old. Hey folf get back with us in 30 years and lets have a look see what kind of shape you're in in your looks. Paris will still look fairly good, ala Joan Rivers,,,,, but the rest of you lots well,,,,,
It still was funny though-
TLovesTeddyComment removed: Retracted by user
-
71%
Tcaros1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
How about McCain is a dope?
Reply
Did you know he actually referred to Czechoslavakia as a country? Hasn't been sind 1993.
He was a POW true. He crashed his plane 5 times before getting his wings. The son of an Admiral he crashed in Vietnam and was captured by the enemey. He was treated better than most, provided medial treatement for his broken arm.
Slate, I'm not sure why his POW status plays well.
I don't think I'd want someone who was captured to be my leader. :)-
57%
BB641 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
From your comments, it's clear you're a flaming lib DNC operative. You'll come back claiming to be a conservative Christian, member of the GOP or independent but you're one of their operatives.
Reply
Big deal, he mentioned a country that split. Barry feels there's 57 states because he's visited them. He also suggested we invade Pakistan, who at the time was an ally to the United States.
On Senator McCain's military record, how dare you insult him. First, he was shot down defending the interests of the United States. You may hate the Vietnam War, but he was fighting for you. Under the directions of one of your heroes, Johnson. Another clueless Democrat. On his other crashes, he was flying ground attack. Low altitude, high speed Skyraiders. Not the safest practice runs but it happens. You also failed to mentioned his heroism when he tried to save a fellow pilot during a fire on board his ship.-
-
100%
Lurch1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There are 57 states and territories, which is what Obama discussed.
Reply
lmao!
you are offended at someone `attacking` McCain`s military record!?
Where were you when the Bushies and the RW establishment smeared his record in 2000? Where do you think the Left is getting all the ammo against McCain`s military record? Muchos Gracias Georges Arbusto!
Point is, McCain was a legacy who got into the academy because of his dad, who only got through the academy because of his dad, who was such a lousy pilot he only did NOT get grounded because of his dad. Then when he had the one chance in his life to show the stuff he`s really made of and make it on his own, he dumped his wife and mother of three for the young bimbo heiress and the free-loader life.
Obama is a self-made man...which is something McCain can never claim. -
100%
Shadowolf1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"On Senator McCain's military record, how dare you insult him. First, he was shot down defending the interests of the United States. You may hate the Vietnam War, but he was fighting for you. Under the directions of one of your heroes, Johnson. Another clueless Democrat. On his other crashes, he was flying ground attack. Low altitude, high speed Skyraiders. Not the safest practice runs but it happens. You also failed to mentioned his heroism when he tried to save a fellow pilot during a fire on board his ship"
Reply
First off, puke for brains, after all the lies libel and innuendo you have leveled at Obama, you got no credibility; and for sure no room to talk about insulting ANYONE...McCain was known as a mediocre pilot, don't attempt to change fact to suit your narrow partisan precepts...secondly, he started this campaign bu attacking using lies, half truths and twisted statements...thirdly you haven't answered questions about McCains corruption...you merely start a spurrious attack to shift attention away from the question, then accuse "The Libs" of doing what YOU are doing...blow your BS out the orifice of your choice...
-
-
40%
slate1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
(How about McCain is a dope)
Reply
I'd refrain from using the word 'dope' when you want to compare McCain and Obama.
(Slate, I'm not sure why his POW status plays well.
I don't think I'd want someone who was captured to be my leader. :)
Yeah I know, a good jump shot means so much more in a leader. -
0%
SAAB76991 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Saying he crashed in Vietnam makes it sound like he did it to himself.
Reply
He was shot down while on a mission.He did spend five and a half years
in the "Hanoi Hilton"(ironically he uses Paris "Hilton" in his ad)where he
was repeatedly tortured.He refused to be released before his fellow
prisoners who were captured before him.He had both of his shoulders
broken while being interrogated.He broke both his arms and his right leg
when his plane was shot down.The medical treatment he received was shoddy and he never did heal properly.He was captured while performing
a service to his country.By the way, its Czechoslovakia. And referring to it
as a country is in my mind no worse than having visited 57 of the states. -
100%
Lurch1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
> Slate, I'm not sure why his POW status plays well.
Reply
If you remember, his POW experience did not play well at all with the Republicans in 2000. They said and smeared that he could not be trusted.
Now, with another eight years closer to senility under his belt, somehow `it`s all good`.
-
-
83%
not2needy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ok Slate, how about the fact that McCain is a philanderer, womanizer, adulterer, liar, and had his cronies cover up the fact that his wife is a thief, forger and drug smuggler? That's just the tip of the ice berg, but if you want more, i'm here for you dude!
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
81%
Charlson1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This is the first endeavor that Paris Hilton has ever done that I respect. She gave as much as she got and for once(with the help of some clever screen writer) she gave an intelligent and satirical video response to the McBush ad. That tongue in cheek self-deprecating humor worked and her answer to the energy crisis is one I could support. WELL DONE!
Reply -
61%
nikkibabe1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The Gay Old Party that brought out bimbos Paris & Brittney to smear a candidate of color, is seeing it backfire.
Reply
The same GOP is protesting efforts by Barak Obama to register thousands of black voters in North Carolina. They complain, that this addition of thousands of black voters will alter the state's long standing Republican base.
Now who are racists.-
21%
BB641 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
We did bring them up. What made me laugh thou was her apparent understanding of energy needed here in the USA. When she outlined her simple plan, it showed more merit than Senator Obama's. Perhaps she's not as dumb as has been implied. Or Senator Obama isn't as smart.
Reply-
67%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
-
-
-
-
43%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
His "actual plan" consists solely of drilling, building more reactors, and giving the oil industry a tax break. That's it. There is no more to the plan.
Reply
However, you should know that while Sen. McCain wants to build 45 more reactors he has no plan for disposing of the actual waste that they will produce. Indeed, McCain has said he will not allow nuclear waste to be shipped through Arizona, even though it is the most direct route to the proposed "repository" at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. In fact, McCain's only proposal thus far to deal with the waste is to "continue studying the proposed repository at Yucca Mt."
That's some energy plan he's got there. I mean, heck, it's WAY more comprehensive than Sen. Obama's plan of researching new fuels, conservation of current fuels (for which you and your cohort openly ridiculed the man), drilling for increased production, and building some reactors (which I disagree with - unless of course you want to keep the waste there in your state. Any takers?)
Yep, McCain's plan is way better than Obama's. Let's face the facts, McCain's plan isn't even as good as a light-weight like Paris Hilton.-
-
75%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
See, bigurn, another one of your spin-monkeys spouting out the lie about what Sen. Obama said.
Reply
Really, some of you fringe right loonies are just too pathetic for words!
ROTFLMAO
Check out bb's post about the DNC controlling the taxes in his city!
You guys and your hyperbole!
ROTFLMAO
-
-
20%
FSU92grad1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"His "actual plan" consists solely of drilling, building more reactors, and giving the oil industry a tax break. That's it. There is no more to the plan."
Reply
That's it ? Compared to inflating our tires to solve are energy problems?
I'll takes McCain's plan anyday.....Osama's is basically telling Americans to "deal with it"....
-
-
-
43%
BB641 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Bill, tell you what. Can you explain Obama's energy plan say from January, April, May, June and July? He's changed his stand on just about everything. I am not a fan of McCain's but at least I understand what he's talking about. He was against drilling offshore until fuel costs hit $4.00/gallon. Then it made sense to change his stand and he explained that in an open meeting. Barry on the other had tried answering this off the cuff and I'm still not sure what he was talking about. He mentions tire pressure and tune ups. This isn't the 1970's. Most vehicles today warn when service is required and some even if there is a low tire. He wants to spend billions on research but not oil, coal or nuclear. That leaves solar, bio and wind. None of which will see any major advances for at least 25-30 years.
Reply
Barry also mentioned tax breaks for big oil and how we should start investing in things like ethanol or other renewable sources. We do. In fact between the farm subs and direct government aid, we subsidize the bio industry by as much as $2.00/gallon. There seems to be a problem with Barry's math. Too bad the "Big 3" anchors were too busy kissing his butt when they went to Germany instead of asking what he was talking about.-
67%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Okay, let's try it this way. If this shows up more than once forgive me, Propeller kept dropping the comment when I hit Reply.
Reply
First, you say you're okay with Sen. McCain changing his position on off-shore drilling because he changed his mind when gasoline hit $4.00/gal. However, when Sen. Obama said he was willing to pursue off-shore drilling as a compromise so that we can get people to the table to implement a more comprehensive better energy policy you don't like that answer. Interesting, which policy shift is predicated on a permanent change and which is predicated on placating the electorate? -
67%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Second, yes vehicles now have built in sensors, and I'll guess people like you only check their tire pressure when the indicator light comes on. You do know the name of those indicators are the "idiot lights" don't you? Spending 10 or maybe 15 seconds a week to check the pressure of your tires, which may or may not cause an "idiot light" warning can save you up to 3.3% in mileage. Now, for someone like you who swears up and down that gas is still going up in WI that could be a significant savings to you. Oh, by-the-by, the 3.3% figure comes from the Department of Energy.
Reply
Additionally, Many people don't bother to perform the scheduled maintenance on their vehicles once the warranty expires. Even in today's high tech world internal combustion engines still need maintenance, no matter what the coward says.-
-
100%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Yes, that is true. A better way to save gas would be to carpool. Still a better way to save would be to use mass transit. The question I have for you is do you have a point?
Reply
bb asked me to explain Sen. Obama's energy plan that is what I did. If you would like to have a separate conversation about ways to conserve fuel I'll be happy to discuss such matters with you at a different time.
-
-
-
67%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Third, McCain was the individual who plans on giving the oil industry and ADDITIONAL $4 billion in tax breaks. Ostensibly, these tax breaks - on top of their existing tax breaks for the exact same purpose - are for research into alternative fuels. As one of the spin-monkeys has pointed out today Obama already voted to give the oil industry tax incentives to the tune of $1.5 billion (?). However, that's doesn't seem to be enough for McCain. I wonder how much will be enough?
Reply
Now. a cynic would say the tax incentive plan announced shortly after Hess Petroleum contributed $285 thousand to the McCain campaign was bought and paid for by the petroleum industry. I'm not going to claim that. But I think it might be something that people need to take into account when looking at McCain's new turn toward off-shore drilling.-
50%
joeeddie1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It would be against the law for Amerada Hess Petroleum to contribute to the McCain campaign. Did they break the law or are you lying? If the money came from a PAC and employees then say that. Obama takes that same green money from those bad, bad people.
Reply -
25%
BB641 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Bill, knowing the McCain Finegold laws, how is this possible? Are you saying they made this contribution in order to procure a vote? Where is the proof, I have an associate for 3 at the justice department that would be interested in this.
Reply-
100%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Again, I'm guessing you haven't been paying attention to the news as of late. Sen. McCain has received ballpark $1.5 million from oil companies. Sen. Obama has received ballpark $400 thousand. I'm not an expert on campaign finances, nor do I really care if the law was violated. Facts are facts however.
Reply
-
-
-
75%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Fourth, (Are you still there? Am I making too much sense for you?) McCain wants to build 45 new reactors by 2010. Now perhaps you haven't heard but we don't have anywhere to dispose of the current batch of nuclear waste laying about in various locations. On top of no plan to dispose of the waste, McCain won't even allow said waste to traverse Arizona even if Yucca Mt. in Nevada were to open tomorrow. That doesn't sound too safe or reasonable to me. While Obama also wants to expand nuclear, he realizes that we need to do it prudently and have some plan in place for disposing of spent fuel rods PRIOR to building more reactors. Maybe we could bury it in your backyard? How's about you Maj. John?
Reply-
-
0%
BB641 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Bill, it's clear you haven't been keeping up with current changes to energy, I mean outside of reading the left-wing news papers and your union protester's guide. The French, your buddies, have made huge strides in the nuclear field. Waste is down over 85% over the old systems we use and there are so many fewer parts to fail. Rather than using fancy water pumps, drives and other failure possible items, gravity is used to move the water in and out. Another change is the fuel itself. All are a pelletized and much easier and safer to handle. Rods are much smaller too. Safety walls and anti meltdown systems are similar so if something did go wrong, they are safer. On the old fuel, there are reprocessing steps that can be taken. More contained, more efficient
Reply
The problem with us in the USA, the same folks that are afraid of nuclear power were the ones who forced more coal plants onto us in the 70's and 80's who now don't want them either.-
-
100%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So you're okay with the NRC dumping the "85% less" waste in your backyard. The point isn't the quantity of waste. The point, my intellectually challenged friend is that all of the waste has to go somewhere. Because whether it is one ton or 1,000 tons it is still highly radioactive and will remain so for the next 10,000 years.
Reply
Again, Sen. McCain has no plan to deal with this waste. None. Zero. Nada. Nyet. But that's okay with you because there's only "15% of what there used to be". So since there's just such a tiny amount you mind keeping it in your garage for us?
-
-
-
75%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Fifth, Obama wants to aggressively push for more alternative sources of energy including but not limited to; wind, solar, geothermal, and bio-fuels. Sen. Obama has proposed government money, subsidies, and tax incentives for corporations looking into and implementing said energy solutions. Sen, McCain on the other hand has consistently said he believes that alternative energy sources are necessary but wants the private sector - aside from the oil industry - to find their own funding. Sen. McCain expects that the oil industry that has now discovered that $4.00/gal seems to be the American threshold will look into developing these alternative fuels only if they are given HUGH incentives, AND access to off-shore oil fields, AND access to deposits of coal in national public land.
Reply -
75%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sixth, McCain wants to increase energy output from burning coal at the same time he wants to loosen emission regulations. That's kind a sad turn of events coming from a man - one of the few Republicans in congress I might add - who once said global warming was a problem we need to deal with effectively. Sen. Obama conversely says that we must clean-up the coal burning plants even more than they currently are. He says that we should continue to use them but not expand the industry until newer. cleaner plants can be brought on line.
Reply
As you can see, if you'd pay attention both candidates have some energy plan. One emphasizes increased drilling, tax breaks for the oil industry, and building 45 reactors with no way of disposing of the current waste. The other candidate emphasizes responsible use of what we currently have, conservation, using public and private money to look into improving renewable energy sources, and exploring ways to use currently dangerous forms of energy (nuclear and coal) in a safer more prudent way in the future.
I know which you support because like most on the fringe right you're greedy and self-centered, and don't care to make any sacrifices for the public good. You know, you have no civic virtue.
If this isn't a detailed enough explanation I'm sure you could go to the Obama website and actually read the plan for yourself. I don't expect you will because we all know that you don't like to trouble yourself.-
100%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No remarks from you and the rest of the fringe right on points five and six?
Reply
Okay, since I did as you asked now it's your turn. Please explain for all of us here Sen. McCain's energy policy. Come on, you and the rest of the haters should be able to articulate his policy without too much difficulty. Let's face it you are so sure it is heads and shoulders above anyone else's. No really, let's hear it.
-
-
-
-
bill-smithComment removed: Spam
-
-
-
-
0%
DropkickaLib1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That would be you since you uncritically vote for a candidate based on his race. Leave it to the only lib who hates gays to accuse to lie about the Republicans and slam gays at the same time. You can't decide who to hate, can you? You're leaving out the questionable manner in which the registration process has occurred. Nice spin.
Reply -
-
Secret_Asian_ManComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
14%
Bonded1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
How can Paris and her parents complain about Paris being modeled as a celebrity? Paris herself has declared that she is the closest thing this country has to royalty.
Reply
I am sure what really has her upset is that she is being lumped together with two airheads like Britney and Barack.-
-
78%
tkyrchncs1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The implication is empty-headed (and perhaps worse) celebrity-famous for being famous. And I see no mention of her parents or how they feel about anything.
Reply
Who would be thrilled to be treated in such a deprecating manner, whatever the 'rents may have done? She supported neither candidate and thumbed her nose very effectively at McCain and his campaign. Bravo! Well done!
-
-
8%
lloydm651 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I guess I took the wrong slant on McCain's comments .At first I thought he was slamming Obama for his rock star image ,making like he's already king of the hill to a bunch of sixtys type leftist .Now I have had second thoughts,if he was comparing Paris Hilton's empty head ,with Obamas empty suit , then she has every right to be pissed at McCain.
Reply -
50%
getreal11 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sometimes our wild young, have great ideas which should be given the benefit of a doubt. After all the price of gas is all of a sudden going down. Many reasons for that, The threat of living without it, should be the main reason. We have been putting more air in our tires since President Carter . Our country has to have the way and means for our people to be able to make these changes. The rich ones that hold all the money and politicians in their hands want to keep it in their hands and are figuring out ways to over capitalize on the new technologies.. That is what is taking them so long. By drilling and switching at the same time makes it easier for the individual to survive. If the rich want to stay rich, I suggest that is what they do.
Reply-
36%
BB641 year, 3 months ago
-
75%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Then maybe you should move, because the price nationally has fallen precipitously over the last week. Both the price of gasoline and crude. I guess you missed that news that has been reported literally everywhere while you were attending one of Omega's circle-jerks.
Reply-
-
80%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
But look, you're here. See, I don't go to anymore of Omega's circle-jerks because I tend to get a little nauseous watching all of the self-love you reprobates practice. You on the other hand must be some kind of deviant if as you claim this is a circle-jerk and you keep inserting yourself into it. Go figure, the radical right loons are not only into lying, cheating, and self-abuse, they are also voyeurs and perverts.
Reply
Just keep your hands to yourself dopekick, I don't want any of the filthy diseases you picked up over at the Omega circle-jerk.
-
-
0%
BB641 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I live in a city & state controlled by the DNC. Goal: highest taxes with the worst return. We lead with the highest property, income, school and fuel taxes in the nation, placing us around 8th. They're doing a great job forcing business from Wisconsin. In a few more years, we'll be the new Detroit.
Reply-
100%
bill-smith1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
See my comment above about moving then.
Reply
And you certainly will get brownie points from the ultimate hater, Omega for blaming the local taxes on the DNC. I mean, that's just so pathetic it's a classic. The Democratic National Convention controls the taxes of your city? Really? So Howard Dean determines how much you will pay at the pump? Gee, you really do have no concept of reality do you?
Before, I thought you were one of the fringe right spin-monkeys who shout down reasoned discussion, but now, now I see you for what you are just a small, scared, pathetic excuse for a human being.
The DNC controls the taxes in your city!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!-
100%
Lurch1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The city of Arlington TX is still paying a half-cent extra in sales taxes to pay off George Bush`s theft when he used eminent domain to steal private property and turned a $600K loan into a $14M windfall personal profit over just a couple of years.
Reply
Remember when the cons beyatched about Hillary making a $100K over some deal...
ah the hypocrisy and lies, if only we could fuel our cars on them, I would be a die-hard Republican Party member.
-
-
-
-
-
-
89%
tkyrchncs1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"After all the price of gas is all of a sudden going down. Many reasons for that,"
Reply
And not one of them has anything to do with supply or drilling. It's all market manipulation. I cannot understand where people who ought to know better get the idea that there is any supply problem.
If anybody had told me a month ago that I would be engaged in debate based on Paris Hilton's energy plan, I'd have laughed them out of town. WOW-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
not2needy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I don't understand her parents. If my daughter had made a porn movie and had the reputation of going to bars, getting almost naked and doing pole dances i would be appauled. It's not like she needs the money, but celebs get paid big money just to show up in the night clubs in LA and NY. But i don't think getting naked is a requirement.
Reply
-
-
0%
pc251 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zf0ZyoUn7Vk
Reply
as they say on the streets of NYC
a stupid dumb ass broad
fuh-ged-aboud-it
it shows you how pathetic the Obama campaign is and what shaky ground it is on when the Libs are now using Paris Hilton to defend their candidate.....
pathetic -
SaraMarabooComment removed: Hard Banned
-
SaraMarabooComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
sanjitoyComment removed: Spammer
-
sanjitoyComment removed: Spammer
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
100%
Poulenc1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I believe the ad is an entirely successful--terrific, in fact--attempt to slap back.
Reply
Paris--or someone--obviously has a keen, satiric sense of humor. She seems fully in control of her own image here--playing it for laughs and point-making. -
JoseMadreComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
loading ...
Submit a Story
Advertisement
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.