Story Comments
Posted by: DropkickaLib 1 year, 4 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
19%
DropkickaLib1 year, 4 months ago
-
-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user
-
100%
lum-chate1 year, 4 months ago
-
-
-
-
23%
4thchance1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So, what does the great Obamma have to say about all this?
Reply
Oh, never mind, Obamma is on vacation. Obamma has no experience what so ever when it comes to fighting wars. That's EXACTLY why he should not be elected in these days of WARS!-
79%
dunkirk1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Obama is on vacation?? yeah I think I remember a President who got a briefing on terrorists planning to attack the US using commercial jets but was too busy going on vacation to do anything. Odd tho too that same president seemed to have set a record by taking more vacation time in the first three years of his FIRST term then any previous President did in their entire time in office. ROFLMAO, just like a 20% to worry about candidate when they sh9oukld be looking tot he Chimp in Charge to lead. Oh wait yeah he's at the Olympics.
Reply-
-
100%
hamy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Um...what is wrong with what he wrote?
Reply
Bush DID take more vacation in his first three years of office than any other president took in their entire run and some of those were two term presidents.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=George_W._Bush:_The_War_President_is_Mi...br />
Bush IS in China playing grab hiney with the US Olympic volleyball team while war is breaking out in Russia.
http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/08/09/bush-hu-ready-for-another-candid-talk/
He WAS on vacation when he was briefed on terrorist threats at the beginning of his presidency and he DID feel it was unimportant at the time. At least that is what he and his handlers said.
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/wire/2004/04/09/911memo/print.html
And he IS at a 20% approval rating.
So, what was he "re-writing?" What was untrue?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
71%
hyperbola1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Oh the zioncons in Washington and israel have their boody fingerprints all over this one. Given that they certainly ordered Georgia to attack South Ossetia, the whole incident seems to be a mixture of an "october surprise" for domestic political gain and a continuation of zioncon "oil-games" in the mideast and central Asia.
Reply
Makes one wonder how many people they are willing to kill for political power.
That is why over 70% of American jews are opposed to the ZionCons and why Israelis are increasingly fed up with Zioncons in America victimizing Israel and preventing mideast peace.
Bush's War in Georgia
Washington's bloody fingerprints are all over the invasion of South Ossetia. Georgia President Saakashvili would never launch a massive military attack without explicit orders from his bosses at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Saakashvili owes his entire political career to NeoCon power-brokers and US intelligence agencies.
http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/08/11/bushs-war-in-georgia/
War in Georgia: The Israeli connection
The fighting which broke out over the weekend between Russia and Georgia has brought Israel's intensive involvement in the region into the limelight. This includes the sale of advanced weapons to Georgia and the training of the Georgian army's infantry forces.
http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/08/10/war-in-georgia-the-israeli-connection/
A Dirty Adventure — Part 2
Turns out the that Israelis have been supplying the US trained Georgian army with weapons.... Interesting. Israeli arms sales to Georgia are purportedly halted, and the Georgians invade South Ossetia in less than a week....
.... Curiouser and curiouser. The thread that emerges from Bhadrakumar’s analysis, however, is the urgency for the US (and the Israelis) to act quickly to disrupt Russia’s ability to bring natural gas from Turkmenistan to the European market. Otherwise, the US will be forced, to the great dismay of Israel, to broker a deal with Iran so as obtain access to Iranian natural gas to break the Russian monopoly.
Hence, we now see a Georgian invasion of South Ossetia about a week after the Russian announcement of its natural gas agreements with Turkmenistan. The invasion of South Ossetia may well be a strong signal that the US prefers confrontation with the Russians over negotiating a new commercial relationship with the Iranians. In other words, it suggests that the US still sees war as the ultimate solution of its disagreements with them.
The invasion also suggests that the US is incapable of choosing an ally in the region, and persists in the hope that it can economically and militarily dominate both the Russians and the Iranians, and through them, just about every country in Central Asia. Such arrogance is likely to be ruinous for all involved. A dirty adventure, indeed.
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/a-dirty-adventure-part-2/
-
loading ...
ranchhand
Wolfie2007
Nixie
bigurn
falcngnzx2
Searchbeam
joey-evans
Neophile
Poulenc
miklkit
Shadowolf
fsev41
Candida
crespi
dunkirk
AntiNeoCon
GWHayduke
bluetexasvalley
TLovesTeddy
Progressive
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.