Handle With Care »
Posted By Beau7890 1 year, 3 months ago in Science & TechnologyLast year, a private company proposed "fertilizing" parts of the ocean with iron, in hopes of encouraging carbon-absorbing blooms of plankton. Meanwhile, researchers elsewhere are talking about injecting chemicals into the atmosphere, launching sun-reflecting mirrors into stationary orbit above the earth or taking other steps to reset the thermostat of a warming planet.
This technology might be useful, even life-saving. But it would inevitably produce environmental effects impossible to predict and impossible to undo. So a growing number of experts say it is time for broad discussion of how and by whom it should be used, or if it should be tried at all.
Read Full Story at nytimes.com »
198 Views Share Story 2 Comments Report
Submitted By:
Beau7890
Truth rests on the mathematical reeds of the infinite and everything moves forward by order of the eagle riding pillion, while the genius of vegetable ...
Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 2 (view all)
-
100%
Beau78901 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Is it too much to ask scientists to consider the implications of their research, some of the unintended effects it may have, and some of the potentially unsavory ways the results might be used?
Reply
I'm not saying anyone should actively prevent scientists from developing new technologies. And I don't think it's possible to anticipate their every possible use, or all of the evils they might unleash upon the world. I just think they should think about these things, and take some responsibility for their creations. -
0%
kboy1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Before we start tinkering with large scale fixes, we need to identify exactly what the problem might be. Only 40 years ago, the top guy at NASA (who now spouts off about Global Warming) was spouting off on Global Cooling. Extremists cherry pick date to fit a theory and then say with a few million dollars they can demonstrate a cure, but if you wait to look at their data, it will be too late to act. Oh Yea, and if you question their data, you are part of the Bush administration so they will sue you.
Reply
More News
Download Squad
Send stealthy, encrypted missives via the web Norbt
Did you know you could play Commodore 64 games on your iPhone?
Tweetdeck back in the iPhone app store with new features, fewer bugs
Go-go Google Gopher... Go! Google invents its own programming language
Firefox 3.6 Beta 2 now ready for download, with 190 bug fixes
Science Daily
Star Trek-like Replicator? Electron Beam Device Makes Metal Parts, One Layer At A Time
Heating, Air-Conditioning And Carpets May Be Hazardous To Your Health
Discovery In Worms Points To More Targeted Cancer Treatment
Surgical Masks Vs. N95 Respirators For Preventing Influenza Among Health-care Workers
New 'FinFETs' Promising For Smaller Transistors, More Powerful Chips
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.