« Back to story "Pluto should get back planet status, say astronomers"

Story Comments

Posted by: tdrapeau 1 year, 4 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

100%
tdrapeau1 year, 4 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

I vote Yes on Pluto as a planet, 9 planets is a much better number than 8. And I'm already a member of both groups. Gold star for me. :-)

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
2 Replies

loading ...
- Neutral
  drpolyphemus1 year, 4 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Pluto wasn't even considered a planet when it was discovered. But making it a planet made it the ONLY planet discovered by an American. Making it a planet is ridiculous because you must make thousands of other fragments of the same size that are now known to exist in the same region planets as well. It was strictly political.
  
  It's like making one new small island a new continent and then saying all small islands, even those a bit larger are not continents.
  
  and if 9 is a BETTER number, then 9000 must be an EVEN BETTER number. A thousand times better. What vacuous thinking.
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  1 Reply
  
  loading ...
  - Neutral
    Ratskii1 year, 4 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    I would say that as of this moment there are only four other bodies in Pluto's range that would need to be given planetary status, and I'm good with having 13 planets. Has a certain je ne sais quoi, don't you know.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...