After Perot's success in the '92 debates, Powers That Be decide ''Never Again!'' »
Posted By Stringcheese 1 year, 2 months ago in News
" I’ve been through this before with the Perot campaign. In 1992, my candidate was included in all three presidential debates. In 1996, the opposite occurred.
What was the difference between the two runs?
After our success in ‘92, the powers that be decided that it would never happen again.
Since Ross Perot’s inclusion in the debates, no third-party or independent candidate has even come close to taking a place behind the debate podium.
And for the past 16 years, the two-major parties have been on a wildly-successful streak of keeping out competition by holding the debate stage all to themselves."
Read Full Story at unitedliberty.org »
2177 Views Share Story 14 Comments Report
Submitted By:
Stringcheese
Love reading about tech news, and politics. Something interesting about me is I sleep on a polyphasic schedule (4.5 hrs at night, and two ...
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 15 (view all)
-
-
-
100%
doppich1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I've heard enough - unless they opt to provide some substance at some point - from McCain and Obama, but I'd sure like to see the minor parties and independents get a major media platform to make their views known. Right now, I'm thinking of voting for McKinney, provided she gets on the ballot in my state and promises not to hit me with her cell phone.
Reply-
100%
Stringcheese1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"but I'd sure like to see the minor parties and independents get a major media platform to make their views known."
Reply
Not only to get their views known, but also to force McCain and Obama to discuss issues they would otherwise gloss over.
-
-
theneighbornextdoorComment removed: Retracted by user
-
100%
Harbeas1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
We need to at least another party. The democrats and repbulicans have offered nothing new to solve our problems. We cannot contnue to do the same old same old. Our government is not working for us and we had better look at different partys that offer novel ways of doing things
Reply -
100%
steve1141 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm very glad the posts here are for another candidate besides our stodgy elephant and green donkey. It may be nice to see McCain or Obama hear another view. You're so correct Harbeas, our government isn't working as well as it should be for us.
Reply -
-
Neutral
allasam1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Barr should definitely be on any debate. Otherwise these two will control the content of the debate and we all know the media will go along like sheep in being sure not to embarrass anyone with a sticky question. All going towards a loss for the American voters. These debates are only going through the motions to dupe us into believing we are in a democracy.
Reply -
-
More News
LA Times
A story of shock, chaos and bravery unfolds in Ft. Hood shooting
Healthcare bill clears parliamentary hurdle in House
Afghanistan government accuses foreign officials of interfering
Unemployment rate rises above 10% ; Obama signs jobless benefit extension
Jason Rodriguez : Shooting at downtown Orlando office building leaves 5 hurt, 1 dead
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.