Bush's Dirty Little Medicare Secret »
Posted By engineer 10 months, 2 weeks ago in News
Let's travel back towards the end of President Bush's first term in office. In preparation for his reelection campaign against Democratic Party Nominee Senator John Kerry, Bush instructed his Secretary of Treasury Paul O'Neill to commission an economic study to determine how much the U.S. government owed for the fiscal year 2004. As a part of this study, Dr. Jagadeesh Gokhale (senior economic adviser to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland ) and Dr. Kent Smetters (economics professor at the University of Pennsylvania ) examined Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. They concluded that the total present value of the liabilities needed to pay some 80 million baby boomers for Social Security was $22 trillion. When Medicare and Medicaid were added, this obligation totaled $43 trillion. Finally, adding Part D Medicare brought the total to $51 trillion.
Read Full Story at marketoracle.co.uk »
571 Views Share Story 4 Comments Report
Submitted By:
engineer
Hi My background is Biomedical engineering with an MBA As you know from all my comments where I almost stand politically. I have loads of ...
Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 4 (view all)
-
83%
TheRealizer10 months, 2 weeks ago
People who were too busy or not interested in voting are destined for a rude awakening in 10 or 15 years when the U.S. can no longer find buyers for the worthless treasury notes......
Reply
If we still had a industrial-manufacturing base things would not look so grim, but we export wealth and import poverty.... -
0%
hyperbola10 months, 2 weeks ago
This kind of scare article doesn't contribute much. What is really needed is discussion of the percentage of our GDP that is spent on various possible matters.
Reply
Let me give an example of a more serious analysis of the costs of social programs that I happened across recently. In this case, Europeans were addressing what the costs of their welfare programs would mean over the next 40 years. Remember that they have a more serious aging problem than we do.
In contrast to the silly scare stories in the US media, the entire analysis was in terms of the increase in the percentage of GDP that would be necessary to continue the programs unchanged. Came to about 4% of GDP. -
67%
miklkit10 months, 2 weeks ago
Sounds nice hyperbola, but the Europeans don't have our military-industrial welfare queens siphoning off all of our money. They are in better long term shape than we are.
Reply -
100%
cushi10 months, 2 weeks ago
As a disabled citizen dependent on Medicare for my healthcare, this is a very frightening and unsettling piece of information. And, I know that at least one part of it is absolutely true - that is, doctors are refusing more and more to accept Medicare patients! I developed a new issue recently that required a referral to a specialist, and it took nearly a month for me (yes, me, not my primary physician - the buck is passed to the patient, now) - to find a specialist in the field that encompasses my issue. Then I had to wait while they figured out whether or not they still accepted Medicare patients, and then they had to check the plan I am under because they had never even heard of it before! This whole process took nearly a month and a half!
Reply
Right now, those in the working world may not be too concerned about this, but as everyone turns 65, no matter how well off you are, Medicare becomes your primary carrier! That could pose major problems down the line and people had better wise up and start addressing this issue now.
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.