DOJ preparing to charge blackwater guards in Iraq killings »

Posted By tehranchik 1 year, 4 months ago in News

1 of 1

The US Justice Department has sent so-called target letters to six Blackwater USA guards involved in the September 16 killings of 17 Iraqi civilians , the Washington Post reported Sunday.

Read Full Story at jurist.law.pitt.edu »

1976 Views Share Story 15 Comments Report

Submitted By:
tehranchik

Well, I'm from and live in the Pacific Northwest. I did live in the middle east during the late 70's and early 80 ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 21 (view all)
- Display
  • 90%
    HannibalBarca1 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Well some sort of justice is better than none, but in reality this should be conducted in an Iraq court as it was done to and in Iraq.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 90%
      Spadecaller1 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      As usual, they might throw some low level criminals into the fire, but the real crooks and bosses involved go untouched. Just watch, if there are any sentences, they will not be strict or carried out. They will be quietly "pardoned"... like Lt. Wm Calley who was found guilty of slaughtering hundreds of Vietnamese villagers at My Lai. Nixon pardoned him.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 90%
      gamahuche1 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Its a token step in the right direction.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 87%
        hamy1 year, 4 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        But I don't actually think that anything will come of this. They will all get off on technical mistakes or something. Bush and Cheney couldn't allow their pets to finally receive justice.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 90%
          miklkit1 year, 4 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          What? The DoJ seems to think it needs to apply some justice. The question is: Is this for real, or is it just a kangaroo court?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          4 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • 91%
          Charlson1 year, 4 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          If it was regular soldiers in our armed forces that committed these acts, they would most likely be held accountable for their actions...at least court-martialed and tried. But not the mercenaries, the contractor's private army have no accountability at all.
          Now how about the mercs who raped women contractors? Are they not as accountable too?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 82%
            Shadowolf1 year, 4 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            ...they should be disarmed and set free...in downtown Baghdad...

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 71%
              jovial1 year, 4 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Hang 'em. Nobody should be above the law.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply

              3 Replies

              loading loading ...
            • 83%
              hyperbola1 year, 4 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Frankly I think this is a token "application of justice" to preserve the charade of "legality". If our DOJ were halfways reputable, there are criminals everywhere they could be prosecuting - including in their own department.

              The Mukasey Doctrine

              Prior to his confirmation, Michael Mukasey fessed up, in a written response to Senator **** Durbin, to a meeting the White House arranged with a group of movement conservatives. The team he met with had a simple agenda: They wanted his assurance that he would not appoint special prosecutors to go after administration figures involved in serious scandals at the Justice Department, including the U.S. attorneys scandal and the introduction of torture with formal Justice Department cover, and they wanted his assurance that Justice would continue to provide legal cover to “the Program.” The team who met Mukasey included figures on the periphery of the scandal who may have had personal reasons to fear an investigation. But Mukasey is clearly keeping the understanding that brought him to the cherished post of attorney general. And that’s bad news for the Justice Department and its reputation.

              Today he addressed the annual convention of the American Bar Association, and expanded upon what may be known to future generations as the “Mukasey Doctrine.” This doctrine holds that political appointees in the Justice Department who breach the public trust by using their positions for partisan political purposes face no punishment for their crimes. ....

              http://harpers.org/archive/2008/08/hbc-90003387

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              View All 21 Comments

              Add a Comment

              Sign In With Your Propeller Account

              Forgot your password?

              Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

              To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.