« Back to story "Polygamy May be a Key to Long Life"

Story Comments

Posted by: Bkumm 1 year, 4 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    Bkumm1 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I don't know if it would be called polygamy. Humans (and all of the great apes) are naturally more likely to have more than one mate at any one time. This goes more for the male of the species than the female, but that is an evolutionary strategy, not a social one.
    From an evolutionary standpoint it makes more sense to have a larger core family unit than just one father and one mother. For instance, is a child more or less likely to continue on the family line if the only father dies? This would be less likely in general.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      MoB20071 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I chuckled at your comment about a child that continues the family line if the only father dies.

      There was a time when I thought that the family line was going to die with my husband (as he is the only son of an only son).

      Well, surprise!!!!

      We are the minority that don't fit into the general rule. We have 3 boys.

      I guess there has to always be someone(s) who go "against the grain" ;-) .

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (3)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.