Diebold Admits Ohio Machines May Lose Votes »

Posted By Neophile 1 year, 4 months ago in Science & Technology

The maker of touch-screen voting machines used in half of Ohio's counties has admitted that its own programming error is to blame for votes being dropped in some counties. The problem can't be fixed before the Nov. 4 election.

Read Full Story at dispatch.com »

1976 Views Share Story 7 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Neophile

I'm a Propeller Scout so if you have any questions or concerns, send me a message and I'll be happy to help.

Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 8 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    Searchbeam1 year, 4 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    That explains how Dumbya got elected in 2004.

    Do you remember the promise by then Diebold CEO Walden O'Dell at a Republican fund raiser in 2003 that Ohio will deliver the electoral votes to Bush/Cheney 2004, and also to Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell that the election "Will be taken care of!"?.

    $250,000 in campaign contributions to Bush/Cheney 2004 by their CEO O'Dell, Blackwell choosing Diebold's machines and the purposely botched voting and disenfranchising of voters had that sinister effect of raping and mutilating our democracy!

    Blackwell may still be tried in the courts and find his cell in the federal "Guest House" when the new administration takes over.

    Here is an interesting link to the horrible saga of stolen Ohio elections:

    http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0828-08.htm

    Read and post it on your wall.

    In another story on this channel, Susan Eisenhower, the grand-daughter of Ike tells why she decided to leave the Republican Party for good, and decided to support Obama.

    We will probably need a special bench of Federal Court to bring all these criminals to justice, something BEYOND the reach of the current, corrupted SCOTUS.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      fsev411 year, 4 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      What I find most scary is that they could steal another election this year. Optical scanners with paper backup seems to be the more sensible answer. Then there's still the problem with manipulated voting lists.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Candida1 year, 4 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        From the article: 'The problem can't be fixed before the Nov. 4 election, so Premier Election Solutions and Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner are issuing guidelines to counties for how to avoid the problem.

        "We will continue to monitor the situation and provide boards of elections with the instruction and support they need to ensure an orderly and efficient election and an accurate count of Ohioans' votes," Brunner said in a memo released today.'

        So after all this, they are still planning to use these machines? Amazing.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 0%
          MajJohn1 year, 4 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Funny how the losers in the election assumes that it was their votes that did not upload. It is simple to check the paper trail that IS generated by the Diebold machines against the computer totals. That is why the machines with paper backup will be used this Fall, besides it's too late now to change the machines to optical scanners. Again, the Ohio Secretary of State knew about this potential problem for how long now?? Nothing like waiting until the last minute so they can cry foul in the Fall. Instead she'll issue instructions to check the computer totals against the paper totals so she can be a Dudley Doright and "save the day".

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          skoss1 year, 1 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Why do we put up with these corruptible machines? When millions of Americans Bank DAILY online with NO PROBLEMS, and millions more buy and sell stock and all sorts of consumer goods online DAILY with NO PROBLEMS. Why can't we use the same Internet SECURITY systems, of I.D.'s and Passwords to CAST OUR BALLOTS, and then PRINT OUT or SAVE a copy of "our" BALLOT as a RECEIPT? If the Internet is SECURE enough for us to bank, and buy and sell nearly everything, then it is SECURE enough for us to VOTE. And those of us who want to bypass these DIEBOLT "trick boxes" should be able to do so. Isn't it amazing how these DIEBOLT machines only make 'mistakes' that benefit Republicans?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            skoss1 year, 1 month ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Why do we put up with these corruptible machines? When millions of Americans Bank DAILY online with NO PROBLEMS, and millions more buy and sell stock and all sorts of consumer goods online DAILY with NO PROBLEMS. Why can't we use the same SECURITY systems, of I.D.'s and Passwords to CAST OUR BALLOTS, and then PRINT OUT or SAVE a copy of "our" BALLOT as a RECEIPT? If the Internet is SECURE enough for us to bank, and buy and sell nearly everything, then it is SECURE enough for us to VOTE. And those of us who want to bypass these DIEBOLT trick boxes should be able to do so. Isn't it amazing how these DIEBOLT machines only make 'mistakes' that benefit Republicans?

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              machines1 year ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Machines may be trustable but people who configure them fix in favor of certain politicians.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              View All 8 Comments

              Add a Comment

              Sign In With Your Propeller Account

              Forgot your password?

              Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

              To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

              More News