« Back to story "Murder conviction reinstated in S.F. dog mauling"

Story Comments

Posted by: DeadXXXManXXXTalkin 1 year, 3 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • Neutral
    DeadXXXManXXXTalkin1 year, 3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It ยป

    bizarre case

    especially the idea that if you know your dog is capable of killing someone and expose others to the danger you are liable for murder

    'capable', not 'likely'

    any dog past a certain size is capable of killing someone. The ramifications of that precedent are mind-blowing

    the fact that the woman said she didn't know her ONE HUNDRED FORTY POUND dog was capable of killing someone and a Judge believed her is patently ridiculous, an extension of the ridiculous legal idea.

    the firggin dog outweighs a large segment of the population

    stupidity and tragedy, common bedfellows

    God save me from the ignorant clutches of the law

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.