Comments for Fox 'News' Taunts Convention Demonstrators; They Respond With On-Air Chants of 'F*** Fox News' »
Posted By jovial 1 year, 4 months ago in NewsThe following video report, as seen live on Fox "News" yesterday, demonstrates that the far-right "news" channel has no clue what the words "raucous", "out of control" or "freedom of speech" actually mean, as "reporter" Griff Jenkins is seen taunting DNC Convention demonstrators, only to receive chants of "F*** Fox News", live on air, in the bargain...
Read Full Story at bradblog.com »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 349
-

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
-
-
-

thejoyofwar1 year, 4 months ago
-

PatrioticAmerican1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
shows what kind of Morons the protesters are they had their chance to voice their views and concerns and all they can do is utter insults, sounds like the dems and leftists are 1 and the same, stay away from direct questions and go for the insults.
Reply-
-
-
-

Goppy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
They said in the 2nd video why they didn't want the reporter to talk to them. The reporter said "I'm trying to give you equal time" and they stated that they don't want Fox to pick and choose their clips like they do and spin it to make them look bad. I don't blame them. FOX isn't news, it is a circus... but CNN isn't much better.
Reply
Honestly, I was half expecting the protesters to be conservatives since it is the Democratic convention. Do conservatives protest over anything? That is a sincere (albeit perhaps ignorant) question. -
-

jdhatl1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The right wing only wants a debate if they can frame the terms of the debate. They knew what they were getting into, and it was almost exactly what they were trying to have happen, they just weren't counting on the cussing. Anyone who believes the misinformation campaign is living in a dream world. t must be nice, but one day you'll wake up to the real world.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-

Endoscopy1 year, 4 months ago
-

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
-

Endoscopy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What you liberals keep forgetting is the difference between rights and responsibility. People have the right to do and say nasty things as long as they don't hurt others. They however have a responsibility to respect other people. You don't get your message out by acting like a two year old having a temper tantrum. You get your message out bu discussing it respectfully. Do you think the post above by thejoyofwar above will change anyone's mind?
Reply-

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Did you get your point across respectfully in the comment above, where you started by saying, "You are disgusting. You say people are not human. What kind of a nut job are you. A tree hugger or PETA person that thinks it is OK to bomb people to protect plants and animals?
Reply
You sound insane."-

Endoscopy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Tell me where I was wrong. He said that any FOX reporters are not human but are creepy disgusting things. Do you think that you can argue intelligently with someone that takes that stance? I was using his own words on him.
Reply
Is it sane to say things like that about a any group of reporters?
-
-

mesodude1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"What you liberals keep forgetting is the difference between rights and responsibility."
Reply
No, actually I think it's cons who think that the right to freedom of speech means the right to say anything THEY want without being criticized. Cons have a very, very warped concept of freedom of speech which, I think, is the main reason cons are always so fearful, spoiling to see others fight and extremely eager to get their hands on guns. For some reason they don't get the connection between living their lives to antagonize others just for the hell of it and the fact that people despise and want to do major harm to them. Cons just can't seem to make that leap in logic. If only... ;-(-

dissent1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I had to laugh at this.....
Reply
fox reporter: what's your message?
protester#1: stop the torture stop the war
protester#2: stop the torture stop the war
group of protester: stop the torture stop the war
fox reporter: do you not believe in freedom of speech?
:\
he was literally spinning on the spot for that last one. how poetic! -
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-

djn3nunez31 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
BS. A raucous Republican crowd shut down the Fla recount with intimidation and threat of violence, so discussing things is not always the way to get things accomplished, at least for the rabid right.
Reply
Do as I say, not as I do huh?
There is no respect for FakeFox news. None deserved.-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user1 Reply
-
-

tchef1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well maybe the Fox reporter should have listened when they told him the first time that they don't want to talk to him. I don't blame them, the way the Fox distorts the news and picks their quotes to discredit those who don't share their ideals I wouldn't want to talk to them either.
Reply
-
-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user17 Replies
-
-
-

Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If this reporter really wanted to know what their message was, he would have arranged for proper interviews or approached them in their staging area. Wading into a bunch of chanting protesters is a GREAT way to get the sort of chaotic footage Fox adores, but don't try to paint this as a reporter 'just trying to get to the truth'.
Reply
If you watch the footage, when one woman actually gave him an answer: "Stop the torture, stop the war." the reporter replied, "Stop the torture, stop the war. I guess you don't believe in freedom." That isn't taunting? -

lbrtyordeath1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Did anyone see Chris Matthews calling out the crazy Hillary supporters at the DNC who were saying Obama went to a Muslim school? Those moronic bimbos just looked him in the eye and said, "We'll send you the info". Then they tried saying this lie was uncovered during a congressional investigation. After some more hardball, they conceded that it was done by a "former" congressional investigator.
Reply
Disinformation spreads like cancer in America these days, proving that Americans would rather here a good story than the truth.
Every day I am amazed at how mind-numbingly STUPID people are.-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user21 Replies
-
-

djn3nunez31 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"They didn't respond to what he was asking."
Reply
Of course they did.
"I'm not going to talk to you" is what I heard. Several others stated clearly "Stop the war. Stop the torture" Then of course when the crowd realized it was FakeFox-News they started dogging him....... -
-
-
-
-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user2 Replies
-
-
SimplicitasComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-

Spadecaller1 year, 4 months ago
-

jordan111 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
They seemed a little surprised @ the crowds reaction to them. LMAO! That's what happens when you leave the la la world of faux news, and step into reality. LOLOL! They've done such a good job of creating a parallel universe, they haven't a clue!
Reply -

DropkickaLib1 year, 4 months ago
-

Neophile1 year, 4 months ago
-
-

Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"All reporters do what he did. Put a microphone in peoples face and ask them to comment. "
Reply
Um, no. Most responsible reporters find a reasonable time and place to conduct interviews. Wading into a group of marchers, yelling 'Don't you believe in freedom of speech' is a stunt. It's not journalism. Fox has no interest at all in what the protesters message is. They simply want to discredit them by painting them all as 'unruly' or 'out of control'.-
SimplicitasComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-

Endoscopy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
He said one word and the liberals go nuts. Here liberals are ranting things and being totally stupid but it is the reporters fault. All reporters do what he did. Put a microphone in peoples face and ask them to comment. But to liberals here they just got what they deserve. Think about the fact that they just then became the representative people in that demonstration to those who view FOX News. Also keep in mint that FOX has a much higher rating in the news area than anybody else.
Reply
Liberal biased news media is sinking. Why do you think CNN has changed their focus to a more moderate point. With FOX and CNN their news departments generate revenue for the rest of the programming by having top ratings. The MSM though have just felt that the news department is not a revenue generating department. The liberal standard that all follow is slowly sinking. The New York Times keeps losing subscribers. If they want to get new readers they need to change their focus. Somehow I don't think they will and they will slowly fade away into insignificance.-

miklkit1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What I saw was a peaceful pre-approved march. Then this guy moves into the middle of it getting in peoples way reaching and grabbing them to talk. They ignored him at first. Did you see how he got in the way of the banner carriers? He was disrupting the march. Those people had to keep moving. There are rules for these things. Then they started venting peacefully but vocally. Good for them. The words and gestures were designed to do 2 things. (1) vent (2) Obscenity isn't allowed on television, so they were depriving him of his footage. Faux noise violated the law by showing it anyway.
Reply
-
-
-

Beau78901 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Oh, Dropkick.
Reply
I'm sure you've given your opinion on the governments of Iraq, Iran and others. Haven't you?
Not that I'd say you don't have the right, or even that freedom of speech is distasteful, as you seem to be implying about Neo.-
-

Beau78901 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I've read several interesting articles posted by Neophile about sustainable agriculture and energy, that don't mention US government policy.
Reply
But I don't get your point. You have a bias. He has a bias. And you also comment about other nations' governments.
What's the difference?
-
-
-
-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user9 Replies
-
-

Ratskii1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Guess I don't understand your interpretation. The reporter started getting in people's faces and demanding that they talk to him. Some of them started getting in his face right back. What do you expect when you go to a demonstration and seek a confrontation. I'm sure he's alright.
Reply
I've been in enough demonstrations to know that if a few demonstrators start to get violent, other demonstrators and parade marshals will move in to calm them down.-

memestryker1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You obviously missed the demonstrations that turned into riots of the late 1960s. There was no calming them down, and people who were just trying to stay out of it and get to and from work were attacked.
Reply
Of course, women and blacks really had something to fight for back then, since the laws left them in the dust. Maybe there isn't a group that feels that downtrodden this time around.-
-

Ratskii1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You'll have to be more specific. I'm talking about protest marches where the organizers have permits and trained parade marshals are interspersed through out the march. There have been a number of marches where provocateurs have started trouble and the police attacked the demonstrators (and in some cases bystanders). There have been others where riots have occurred that had nothing to do with protest marches. Can't really reply to you if I don't know what you're talking about.
Reply -

djn3nunez31 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"You obviously missed the demonstrations that turned into riots of the late 1960s"
Reply
Tens of thousand of draftees had been killed in Vietnam. The Anti-War candidate had been murdered. Those protesters in the 60's planned to riot if confronted by police. The police went way overboard.
I'm glad to see cooler head have thus far prevailed in Denver, much to el-rashbo's utter horror.
-
-
-
-
-

Shadowolf1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
...speaking of Nazis...D-Klip is apparently Propellers Hitler jr....the Faux "reporter" was provoking a response, and having got it; started the GoebbelMatic,spinning it so the MARCHERS would seem the provocateurs... So DK Lip heil THIS you politiskank SOB!!!
Reply -

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The guy in the second video is the rapper Nas. He's a rapper and an activist. He took over 600,000 signatures and delivered it to fox News. Google Nas and 600,000. you'll get the hits. I can't post the link, because propeller jumbles it up.
Reply -
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
-
-
capecoralMComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
-
-

djn3nunez31 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Sounds more like the demonstraters were the Nazis,
Reply
More like the gathering of the rainbow crowd.
You do get it that nazis were militaristic and marched in lock step with the brown-shirts, right? They didn't call for the end of war and torture, the Nazis were calling for it.
-
-
-
CharlsonComment removed: Spam
-
CharlsonComment removed: Spam
-
-

4thchance1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You left wing dems really crack me up. You simply grab crap out of thin air, then post it and run with it..Then all the lefties here beleive the post. It's toooooooo FUNNY. You people really should try to stick with the facts and reality!
Reply
-
-
-
-

ecotourusa1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
thanks mesodude..."I've got a hangover"
Reply
I needed to smile. I felt that way yesterday, but, realized that I had quit coffee and had a headache as a result.
the remedy: I drank a cup. better now.
we are coming into some horrible times. I think all of us need to quit taking sides and try to be more tolerant and understanding. have your opinions...but, understand, we all have one!
liberty is the way to bring us to higher ground.
-
-
-
-
-
-

jordan111 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What a goof ball that reporter is! "Don't you believe in freedom of speech"...."don't you believe in freedom of speech"......"don't you believe in freedom of speech"......Good lord! He doesn't dictate when people talk, or about what. That isn't "freedom of speech." How old is he? Twelve?
Reply
And LOL @ "F88k Fox News!" Now THAT is freedom of speech, ya goofy 'reporter' you.-

Endoscopy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ah, another Code Pink attitude. It is all right to shout over someone else trying to make a statement. Such an attitude. If you don't like what a person is saying yell them down. They seem to be teaching that at a lot of universities these days. Typical liberal mentality.
Reply-
-

Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
How dense does someone have to be to keep hollering "Don't you believe in freedom of speech?" to a group of marching protesters?
Reply
The man was spoiling for a confrontation, pure (or puerile) and simple. When he GOT an answer from the woman who said "Stop the torture, stop the war," the reporter replied "Stop the torture, stop the war. I guess you don't believe in freedom."
Fox WANTS images of chaos and the DNC. Fox knows full well the reputation it has among the left. Wading into the middle of a march like that was a stunt to get sensationalist footage.-

lbrtyordeath1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
ENDO!
Reply
Are you really SERIOUS?????
Have you EVER watched Bill O'Reilly?
That man is the KING of yelling people down.
Jesus Christ. I can't believe you would be that hypocritical to try and say LIBERALS yell people down, when ole Bill O' is the absolute GOD of yelling people down, turning off their mics, attacking their motives and patriotism, etc.
"They seem to be teaching that at a lot of universities these days,"
Typical NeoCon mentality....Anti-education, anti-knowledge. -

djn3nunez31 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"It is all right to shout over someone else trying to make a statement."
Reply
Well according to the Neo_Con hand book it is permissable for the Republicans to do it but if it is done to them they must cry and whine like little puppies....... -
-
-
-
-
-
-

smithichie1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Talk about reporters creating the news, that's what happens when you STAND in the middle of a parade. He would have gotten the same reaction doing that to the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade.
Reply
Oh, and it looked like a few hundred people, not 1000.-

CRYMTYPHON1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I am sure it was Fox's deliberate intention to create some news; to send in their people and get the crowd to start swinging, maybe get a riot going and then have the cops come in and bust everyone while the high-price comentators played old clipsof the 68 riot.
Reply
It didn't work that way.
And everyone is a cameraman now.
-
-

tehranchik1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I don't like the slant that fox came out with on this. Comparing it to a riot?! That's a little over the top---but that's fox.
Reply
To be fair I'm glad I wasn't there and I think the crowd behaved badly as well. I've been to many demonstrations in Portland and our crowds have yet to act like this. I was very uncomfortable watching.-

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Maybe it would be "nicer" for them to just start a libelous email and spread the word through the internet. Or maybe let themselves be interviewed only to find out later that the tape has been edited to make them out to be violent buffoons. The people that walk those protest lines are well aware of the antics of Fox News. They have the right to not be interviewed by people that they don't want to be interviewed by. That includes telling someone not so politely to **** off!
Reply -
-
-

tehranchik1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I agree jordan. There are probably thousands that would like to scream out in frustration. But look at the footage---look at it from a different point of view. You aren't right or left--democrat or republican----it's not very appealing. If I were on the fence--this might make me jump to the other side. Please don't misunderstand me. No one likes fox and their bias less than I do. I just don't like to be represented by a crowd out of control like this one was.
Reply-

jordan111 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
. But look at the footage---look at it from a different point of view. You aren't right or left--democrat or republican----it's not very appealing>>>>
Reply
Neither is calling Obama a "muslim" (in a derogatory way) appealing. Neither is taking Obamas words out of context "appealing'. Neither is repeating Barack HUSSEIN Obama (derogatorily) "appealing." Anyone sitting on the fence after the last 7 years, isn't smart enough to vote democratic.
And IMO, anger and well chosen phrases shot at people who have clearly harmed this nation with propaganda, is honest and deserved.-

not2needy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Being subjected to all you pointed out, constantly, is enough to make people lose their cool. I admit, i admire people who can take the high road and stay cool, but i am starting to really feel like nice guys finish last. Look at the last 2 elections, and it's getting worse.
Reply -
-
-

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I didn't see a crowd out of control. I saw a crowd saying enough is enough. The people that see a raucous group aren't in touch with what a real protest consists of. Fox News is one of the main media services that have lambasted candidates, Senators, Congressmen, etc. To think that they will give you more respect if you are civil with them, is disingenuos. There were various reporters out there. They didn't say f*** NBC or ABC or CNN or NPR. They recognize who wishes them ill, and they have every right ot say NO. NO more! It's the right of every citizen in the U.S. to speak their mind. The original intent of this reporter was to minimalize these citizens message. To make them seem like nuts. He got more than he bargained for.
Reply -

miklkit1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I have seen the main guy talking before on( I think) the Colbert Report. He is a rapper who collect something like 600,000 signatures protesting faux noise reporting. Faux noise refused to accept them when they were dropped on their doorstep. If you listen you can hear him talking about it. Then came the chants. Yeah, that's a real out of control mob there. There were plenty of police there watching it all, and they didn't see anything worthy of action.
Reply
This is in reference to the 2nd video.-
-

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
/fox_news_has_nothing_aga...php">http://www.236.com/news/2008/07/25/fox_news_has_nothing_aga...php
Reply
Here's the story. The rapper's name is Nas. -

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You have to delete the all the characters before "http" in order for the link to work. Propeller really has a problem with posted links.
Reply
/fox_news_has_nothing_aga...php">http://www.236.com/news/2008/07/25/fox_news_has_nothing_aga...php
-
-

AnteUp1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Tehranchik ~
Reply
You make a very legitimate point.
No matter how Fox and others portray us - I think of myself and those
with like minds as the GOOD guys. I don't want to be ashamed of
groups representing our worthy cause - so it matters how the
protests are conducted.
-
-
mackiemesserComment removed: Retracted by user12 Replies
-

Natureboy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hey, Tehranchik -
Reply
I'm the veteran of quite a few protests as well. Haven't seen the video, Bradsblog is down at present, but considering the status quo, dropping the f-bomb is at best faint damnation.
The problem with actions like this, IMO, is not that they are crusty or rough around the edges, it is that it is at its heart poor strategy, in that we gather with might inferior to that of the state to meet the state head-on. Better that we end-run the state, build local economies, drop out of the global, teach kids that war is a racket, etc. Our present state is FUBAR, and that means F'd up beyond all reform. So lets stop trying to reform it. Build something better that does what the state is supposed to, and the state will wither.
All that being said, its still good to hit the streets periodically to loudly dissent, just so people see that they CAN still dissent without being whisked away to Gitmo. -

Natureboy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hey, Tehranchik -
Reply
There are two models of protest. The first is that you behave like proper little ladies and gentlemen and tailor your message to be bland and palatable to those who are sitting on their sofas watching the telly.
The second says that social change becomes inevitable when the status quo becomes unbearable, and it is bringing the strife, bringing the upset, shock, distress that helps that happen. Thinking back to the civil rights era and the Vietnam years, this latter model seems to have some validity.-
-

dissent1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
if a tree fell in the woods would anyone hear it? nothing much means anything in this world anymore without a camera around.
Reply
a protest may as well not happen without one. it's about exposure. in this story the camera was from fox and it and the stooge with the microphone attached to it became the story. peaceful demonstrations aren't much of a story. sorry to say that but that's the way it is. i've seen people doing nothing until a camera shows up and then all hell breaks loose. everyone's an actor
-
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive1 Reply
-
-
-

Neophile1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Classic.
Reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3SemYQH-8o-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-

Charlson1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Was the guy beatened and then arrested for threatening Cheney with the F-bomb? Something similar happened to a man at a mall who told Cheney he didn't support his war in Iraq nor his other policies and Cheney had his secret police, oh, I mean secret service, grab the guy and arrest him in front of his little daughter.
Reply
-
-
davidhallstromComment removed: Spammer2 Replies
-
-

DropkickaLib1 year, 4 months ago
-
-
eyesopenComment removed: Abusive
-

smithichie1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Even FOX reported these folks weren't for Obama, however if you wish to lump all libs together it's fair game to lump you with these 2 'fine' folks.
Reply
http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/08/25/mainstream-news-reports-possible-obama-assassination-plot/?comment=3412727#comment_3412727 -
-
-
TNTComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
-
-

Shadowolf1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
YOU are DikLip...you don't have the balls to be civil...so don't expect any...as for the soap, one will be for each end of you,because there's no telling where your (alledged)brains are so blow your faux indignation out the orifice of your choice while singing "I'm forever blowing Bubbles,(but Bubbles will never blow me)"
Reply
-
-
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive
-
-
-
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive1 Reply
-
-
-
-
-
tehranchikComment removed: Spam
-

not2needy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I wonder how the anchors on Fox get away with the things they say. Not long ago someone said something very racist, maybe the N word or something, i can't remember, but they all laughed about it. What kills me about that is, they have black reporters who join in.
Reply-

AnteUp1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
N2N ~
Reply
The most astonishing was flipping to Fox at the close last night
- for the record, I NEVER do that and groaned. My hubby said it
is important just to find out what the extreme rights talking points
will be - anyway, Chris Wallace summed up the evening by saying
he felt is was pretty much a WASTE? This is after Michelle Obama's
rousing speech and Senator Kennedy's tribute.........a WASTE?
How can anyone call that news? That's an AGENDA!
-
-
-

CRYMTYPHON1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It's an old trick to incite a riot in your oponents meetings.
Reply
Or for newspeople to incite a crowd; shouting people make better news than calm people.
I have read that Martin Luther King worked to train marchers not to be provoked; whether they were spat on, shouted in the face, or even cattle prodded; they were not to strike back, not to riot, to stay on the march.
It was control; it made them strong, and denied a lot of good film footage to his enemies. -

miklkit1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/22/nas-to-deliver-600000-signature-petition-protesting-fox-newss-attacks-on-african-americans/
Reply
This link works. -
aboutmedicineComment removed: Hard Banned
-

TonyByron1 year, 4 months ago
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive8 Replies
-
-

TonyByron1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"They did their party proud."
Reply
Many here seem to think so. If asking "What's your message" and "Do you believe in free speech" is taunting, imagine the reaction to a question like "Why are you liberals marching today?"
Heads would explode. Sad little people with no message and full of hate.-

Tangent0011 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Dude, the reporter waded into the middle of a demonstration march and started hollering, "Don't you believe in freedom of speech?" when the protesters didn't want to stop and talk to him. It was a MARCH, of course they didn't want to stop. Griff was walking against the flow of the crowd in what looked like the densest part. The man was spoiling for a confrontation.
Reply
"What's your message?" Read the banners and signs or talk to the people at their staging area!
-
-
-

CRYMTYPHON1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Jovial has provided us angry little people with many a laugh, TonyByron.
Reply
Among the posters on Propeller he is a giant of the qualities you disdain.
Picture him as Gulliver, sitting on the beach of Lilliput, and telling jokes to a mob of miniscule, unimportant people you'd probably stamp on.
But it's a crowded beach, tonyb. There are a LOT of us angry little unsophisticates about this year.
And don't laugh; you didn't get the joke, and it wasn't meant for you anyway.-
-

TonyByron1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"There are a LOT of us angry little unsophisticates about this year."
Reply
No kidding.
"And don't laugh; you didn't get the joke, and it wasn't meant for you anyway."
I don't believe jovial posted this story as a joke. If he did it was a joke on the sad little people captured on the video.-
-

TonyByron1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"No, the joke was on Fox News."
Reply
Ah yes, petty, angry, left-wingers showing their true face by chanting "fuqfoxnews" on international news is quite the joke. It might be funny if you have a 10 year old mentality.
Would a group of right-wing protesters chanting "fuqnbc" in response to a request to state their message make you laugh?-
-

miklkit1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
According to broadcast law, faux noise would not have been able to show that footage. But they did anyway. Faux noise broke the law by attempting to disrupt a legal, peaceful march, and then showing footage on television that is against the law
Reply
. http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1591451/20080723/nas.jhtml
-
-
-

CRYMTYPHON1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"I don't believe jovial posted this story as a joke"
Reply
Quite right. Jovial did not post the story as a joke. He posted it as serious evidence on the table, for the jury to see that those we accuse of fraud, malice and hypocricy are indeed guilty.
It's a long trial, and will go on past all our lives.
But the joke, Tony; it was there. It is there. I would explain it to you out of pity, but it would do no good. If you feed a starving dog bread, he still starves.
Best I can say is, look at old pictures of freedom fighters; MLK or Lech Walesa or Lincoln, Ben Franklin or Ghandi or whoever you admit stood up against a system that had the cameras, the spokesmen, the broadcast towers, - against a system that had every power but the truth.
Do Lincoln.
Look close at the eyes, the corner of the mouth.
See the hint of a laugh?
The joke is there, for those who hear it.
Pancho Villa called it democracy, and no one laughed like Villa.
But like I said, the joke isn't for eveyone.
-
-
-
-

schmirt1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
II am sure the take on the story would be completely different if the crowd were prolife protesters and the reporters were not fox news. (See how awful those right wingers are?). One persons crowd of protesters may be anothers mob of 'brown shirts'.
Reply
Perhaps the reporter "taunts" . How aweful!! A group that protests----chants, cheers, outrage' insults, blocking areas---are all elements to disrupt the order/ status quo. It is a mass "taunt". And if you dont buy that, just talk to police who do crowd control. It s all about "taunting".
The resort to obscenity just reflects to level of discourse---usually to make a point . But it is actually a failure because the point is lost. The expressions sabotage the message.
Its funny how people channel thier hatred to fox news---all of network news isa cesspool.-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: Spammer, Abusive7 Replies
-
-
-
-
-

CRYMTYPHON1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The sophistication, civility and intelligence of lloydm65 is so exactly a representation of the neo-con mind and spirit on Propeller, there can no longer be any hesitation, no longer be argumentation or obligation to debate for this nation.
Reply
By the authority vested in me I nominate lloydm65 as the official spokesman for the right on propeller.
-
-

BB641 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Lloyd, I agree. I think Planned Parenthood should take a bunch of photos of this group of youth. Present this to the ultra right wing of my party and you're likely to get us to support all methods of birth control and sterilization. Never thought, looking at this group that de-evolution was possible. Time to start thinning the gene pool.
Reply-

Natureboy1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"told you biting those fart bubbles in the tub would change your views.Now you look at piles of dog poop with hair on top,and mistake them for people"
Reply
Thanks for sharing. You obviously have a fecal fixation. While it is not ours to judge, this is a thread about news and protests. Perhaps you would be happier meeting with people who share your interest on some board dedicated to crap fetishists.
-
-
-

thejoyofwar1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
LOOK EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT TO GET A JOB WITH FOX NEWS YOU HAVE TO HAVE GAY SEX WITH RUPERT MURDOCH THE JEWISH GAY GUY FROM DOWN UNDER FOX NEWS IS SCUM BUT SINCE THEY SUPPORT RIGHT WING WACKOS THE REPUBLICANS LIKE THEM DIRTY FOREIGN OWNERSHIP THAT IS WHAT REPUBLICANS LIKE
Reply -
-
-

Georgia501 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ever notice how the Koz Kidz seethe at Fox, yet we never see any examples, no quotations, no indication of what it is about Fox that seems to get their panties in a twist.
Reply
We point to Dan Rather using forgeries to undermine the election process. They yawn.
Jayson Blair. They never heard of him.
Her Perkiness refers to Sadam "hopefully" escaping capture. They shared her hope.
We can point to dozens if not hundreds of examples of leftist/Democrat media bias with absolutely no conservative/Republican counterbalance, and they're like, "Isn't that the way it's supposed to be?" Yet they are oblivious to the repeated appearances on Fox by liberals such as Juan Williams, Ellen Ratner, or Mora Liasson--just for starters--who consistently reflect liberal perspectives.
We consider this, and it's clear who's being brazenly, pointlessly, and mindlessly partisan in this discussion.
[insert lib retorts concerning O'Reilly and Hannity because libs are too illiterate to grasp the distinction b/t a news outlet and an entertainment product]-

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Quite the contrary. The Dan Rather thing had major repercussions on Mr. Rather. Read up on it. I'll say it again. Google "nas" and "600000". They tried to let Fox News know why thy felt this way in a "peaceful manner". Fox News totally ignored them. They were told F you first. They just replied in kind.
Reply-

Georgia501 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Tell us, did Dan Rather experience the repercussions one might associate with a singlehanded attempt to--feloniously--use falsified federal documents to hijack a federal election?
Reply
Or was he merely Jayson Blaired?
Your ilk are off the rails complaining about BIAS, yet when faced with BIAS ON STEROIDS from your own, you do not have the morals, the decency, or the DNA to respond in kind.-
-

Georgia501 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
For what? The Plame non-story?
Reply
It has never been establised that Valerie Plame was covered by the covert identities act.
That's the problem with you libs. Joe Wilson cries "Wolf!" and like automatons you put your brains on hold and run with the pack without establishing even basic facts. Not that conservatives are immune to the impulse...the Paula Jones story should never have been given legs, and its background should have been more thoroughly investigated.
-
-
-

miklkit1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You need to watch this video about faux noise.
Reply
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/22/nas-to-deliver-600000-signature-petition-protesting-fox-newss-attacks-on-african-americans/
-
-
-

Nowalive1 year, 4 months ago
-

miklkit1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Perhaps you should watch this video.
Reply
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/22/nas-to-deliver-600000-signature-petition-protesting-fox-newss-attacks-on-african-americans/
-
-

crespi1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I am in full agreement about the fake news channel known as "Foxnews." They have smeared, slanted, falsified, used innuendo, mislead and outright lied to promote an anti Democracy Neocon agenda since their first day of broadcast (which I watched.)
Reply
The even won the right to legally LIE on their false news programs. They have been a mouthpiece for the Bush dynasty, hate-filled fundamentalists, corporate criminals and fascist hate-mongers of all types, and we've all had enough.
F**K FoxNews!!-
-

Nowalive1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That is my point. FOX was put on the air to counter CNN, MSNBC, et al. I think ALL media outlets go too far in pushing an agenda, right or left. I want facts upon which to base my decisions, not indoctrination, pandering, etc. I am far more intelligent than the news readers (and that is ALL they are) think I am.
Reply-

jovial1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There was no liberal overall left leaning slant on CNN, MSNBC and others they went in both directions. CNN has Glenn Beck. MSNBC has Tucker Carlson. Fox has Colmes. He shares the show with Hannitty. who by the way, is the real owner of the show. When Colmes is away on vacation, I've seen times where they replaced him with a person that just sits there and totally agrees with all of Hannity's points without argument. It's sickening to see.
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-

Nowalive1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This is just simply amazing. I watched the videos and came to the conclusion that this "reporter" should have kept his opinion to himself ( as should ALL "reporters") and simply reported on the march. The "protesters" didn't seem to be protesting much of anything if they would not use this opportunity to have their voice heard on an INTERNATIONAL cable network.
Reply
The posts in this thread by ALL segments of the political spectrum show an absolute disdain for any civil discourse. As I read the comments and replies here I noted a majority of them contain cheap shots, manufactured hate, libel, dis-information, et al.
WE are the future of political change. It starts here with a grass roots movement to make this nation, the GREATEST nation on earth, a show case for positive change, beginning with how we treat EACH OTHER. Please read my submission entitled "America United?" and you will gain a deeper insight into my concerns for the direction this country is taking.
Diversity is to be celebrated, but diversity to the exclusion of communities and common goals for the common good is quickly destroying this country, and our standing in the eyes of the world.
This fact can be seen on a street level in most of our major cities, on a block by block basis. No longer do we have neighborhoods where ALL the children played together and the adults mingled on the stoops. Now each neighborhood gathers in cliques in different sections of the block. Whites over here, latinos here, blacks here, asians here, etc. Perhaps we should celebrate diversity less and community more.
http://www.freewebs.com/nowalive/americaunited.htm
Vote Hamilton in 2012
Common sense, is genius in it's working clothes.-
-
wasntmeComment removed: Abusive
-
-
-
-

dwemm1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think people owe a lot to Fox News for actually covering this as news. The past few conventions have put protesters into twilight-zone protest areas that ghettoize their ideas and ideals. This makes them really easy for regular and cable networks to ignore.
Reply
The reason the protests of the 60's and 70's appeared on the news? Because the nets were trying to scare the American populace with the evil hippies. The reason the protests weren't covered anymore after the 80's? Because the nets decided that the country's homogenous image was being subverted. Hard to say "United we stand!" if you aren't pounding down those who disagree.
-
-
hefaa1Comment removed: Hard Banned
-

Commodore11 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm sure this is just more fiction and bull dreamed up the far left loons in the country. Thank God for FOX News! If this were a communist country the liberal media would be the state run TV and FOX News would be the underground freedom channel.
Reply -
-

Progressive1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Griff must be one of those people who believe freedom of speech extends to yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theater. Fox News no longer seems able to recruit or retain credible field reporters.
Reply
Perhaps this is part of the reason the international community lends greater credence to CNN. -

conservativemike1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What a delight to see the loonie left wing vermin crawling out from beneath their rocks. Almost lemming like, every four years the great unwashed display their ignorance and hate. Reading the vile comments about Fox News, the undisputed leader in cable news, only solidifies my conviction that the bozos and anarchist' on display, featuring lying creep churchill as a reprehesible ex-academic representative , and his band of tatooed/pierced rabble are shining examples of the mentally challenged wing of the democratic party.
Reply
I assume that this younger generation of mental midgets are the illegitimate spawn of the 68 chicago convention malcontents. The dim bulbs posing as legitimate reporters on msnbc,cnn,nyt and the hate filled blogs such as moveon, huffpost,media matters and kos should be wearing obama cheer leading uniforms.
Truely disgusting how low the msm has stooped in their idolatry of "hope" and "change" with no substance to support their pov. I will savor the election night victory of John McCain and revel in the knowledge that the punks and pukes, like those contributing to the drivel in this comment section, who are looking for more government handouts, might actually have to go out and get a job. -
RIChrisComment removed: Retracted by user
-
ML2007Comment removed: Retracted by user
-

shanrie19761 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I always find it amusing when the so called champions of free speech only believe in their rights to it. It's free as long as you totally agree with me, otherwise you should be silenced at all costs. Sounds more like Communism to me. I find it equally amusing that these same people hate on Fox when the only source of their news is from liberally biased news sources. I wonder how many have ever actually watched Fox and not just blindly taken the word of others?
Reply-

lbrtyordeath1 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I always find it amusing when people throw around the word "communism" when they should be using the word fascism.
Reply
I like how anytime anything is anti- or not like the US people call them "communists".
Take a political science class, McCarthy.-
-

Georgia501 year, 4 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I always liked the term lefties use for commies...after the commies have murdered their own in the millions.
Reply
"agrarian reformers"
So quaint. So innocent. Not an ounce of guile. It inspires such a pastoral scene that one almost fails to notice the piles of corpses the "agrarian reformers" leave in their swath of destruction.
I think of Stalin's victims in Siberia, ernestly writing him letters begging for intervention, for justice, for their lives, attesting--truthfully--to their unblemished record of support for his regime. Letters that, if sent, were never opened. The very essence of futility--yet in the mind of lefties in the West--the horizon of hope toward which all mankind marches.
It'd be hilarious if it weren't so tragic.
-
-
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.