Unsubstantiated, Racist, Character Attacks; Propeller’s Front Page »
Posted By Spadecaller 10 months, 1 week ago in News
For those of us who cherish the freedom to use Propeller for responsible communication, we must endure articles that are false, bigoted, and hurtful to others. The sad fact is articles of this nature often make the front page and even become the number one story. Why should it be that way? Should anyone be held accountable... and if so, who should that be?
Read Full Story at freewebs.com »
4825 Views Share Story 122 Comments Report
Submitted By:
Spadecaller
By envisioning, communicating, and creating something different we can help each other find peace and understanding. I usually enjoy the effort despite the obstacles.
"The ...
Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 446 of 628 Comments (view all)
-
89%
Bacalao10 months, 1 week ago
Bravo Spade. I too am sick of seeing lies about either candidate. As well as other libelous "stories" on netscape. I try to avoid them at all cost.
Reply-
92%
populist10 months, 1 week ago
What people, I believe, need to understand is quite simple. An article reaches the home page of propeller based, not on what each of us sees as "good" - but rather, on a ranking system, an algorithm, that tries to mathematically determine what the community is most interested in.
Reply
Without specifics, an article's score goes up as it gets more reads, more props and more comments. Comments, for example, seem to be quite powerful.
That being said, if anyone here thinks an article is simply inflammatory, the best move is to NOT read it - and even more so to NOT comment on it.
Those that want to promote nasty articles will always "bait" people to comment and read with wild headlines, crude comments, and the like. They want people to get mad - and comment.
Why? So their "message" will get to the front page. period.
Personally, I just ignore a lot of articles here.
On the other hand, when people see an article they like - instead of just a blind "prop" it might be a good idea to post a quick comment too. I'm going to start doing that a bit more often myself. -
75%
jovial10 months, 1 week ago
That was an outstanding article and comment. The attacks have been unrelenting. His preacher, his wife, his mother, his father, his grandparents. It's an unrelenting attack on the character of this candidate. I think i know why. It's worked in the past. It's a ploy that has given the Republican party good results and explains why they have won so many elections in the last 20 years. I don't think it's so much a color or racist thing. It's more an ideology attack. Let's face it, Perot dropped out of the candidacy in large part due to the attacks on his family. Kerry was swiftboated. Clinton was dogged throughout his entire Presidency with sex scandals. Imagine if George Bush had a left-wing special prosecutor assigned to investigate him throughout his entire presidency. Do you think he would still be President now? I think not. The fact of the matter is that the "race thing" is convenient now. The candidate is black. It's the easiest thing to pick on. He's also got a foreign name. So what better way to debase the character of this candidate, but by saying everyone that he ever associated with was a racist, a Muslim, or a communist. It's dirty politics at it's worst. A real eye opener for those that think our democracy and political system is the greatest system in the world.
Reply -
37%
Endoscopy10 months, 1 week ago
This article is written by someone who likes to throw the hate around a lot when it comes to Christian and Conservatives. He puts together presentations and puts them on sites like this one that puts pictures of Christians or conservatives along with pictures of Hitler and the Nazi war machine. This is nice discourse. He uses the term Nazi on this site and others when talking about conservatives.
Reply
My advice to Spadecaller is to get the beam out of your eye before trying to get the spec out of someone else's eye.
Most of what was said in that article is found by simply verifying by using the web. There are portions that are not verifiable by doing that. Spadecaller expresses his hate by arguing against existing evidence. Is he trying to silence people that he does not agree with. What a guy. -
69%
donald5110 months, 1 week ago
...why the country needs the Truth in Telecommunications Act that Reagan vetoed... and why today's repugs oppose the Fairness Act. If it takes a court of law to penalize the liarsand deceivers... eventually honest news will prevail... only an honestly informed America insures democracy as our forefathers envisioned can survive!
Reply -
100%
dunkirk10 months, 1 week ago
I can understand you ignoring them, but in some ways its like the majority of the Christians who dont comment on the wack nuts taking over. If an article is over the line someone needs to say it, otherwise you read a slew of comments that basically are in support of it. The Sink button is gone now and that use to be one way to place a comment on an article to say it sucked.
Reply
-
-
-
-
63%
jovial10 months, 1 week ago
You know what sometimes get's me angry is that when stories are put out like this, a lot of liberals run over to comment. I've even seem some liberal minded individuals prop the story! When you comment, either yay or nay you lend validity to the story by raising the prop number.
Reply -
81%
Goppy10 months, 1 week ago
Yes, I agree. Thanks Bacalao.
Reply
My position on this issue is probably not popular ... ... ...
While I have voiced outrage to these stories online, I personally see these stories as an opportunity. I figure ... it's better that they appear on Propeller than on FOX, SBC, and on Rush Limbaugh ... because you KNOW they will appear on those venues ... but without the intelligent rebuttals which Propeller members can provide.
Look, I work with Christian Conservatives every day. This is how they think. As AlphaGnosis has been saying ... (half kidding ... I hope) these people see Barack Obama as the anti-Christ. It's an opportunity to recognize that for a large portion of America, the election is a twisted religious issue. I see these stories as an opportunity to compare the extreme moral perversion they represent and contrast them with the aspirations of patriotic Americans who wish to make our nation a better place for our children ... and our children's children.
As the election draws near, I do see a ramping up of attack stories from my fellow Christian Conservatives. Interestingly, the more avowed they are as 'Mainstream Christian', the more intense is their vitriole. I am seeing what I assess as a 4 to 1 vicious attack from the right. I think Liberals and Progressives ... whatever you call yourselves ... should be proud of this ratio.
As an aside, I would recommend that Liberals refrain from calling John McCain a traitor or submitting stories to this affect. He's not a traitor. He's an adulterer and a Flip-Flopper, but he's not a traitor. To say otherwise will not garner any good will to your point of view.
I also think it's a bad idea to compare Bush to Hitler. Certainly, this happens far less than my fellow Conservatives harp about. But I HAVE seen it on occasion. Bush is the worst president ever, the most duplicitous, and I believe the most dangerous ... but he's not a Hitler. His low regard does NOT need to be augmented with this kind of comparison. Again, to say otherwise will not garner good will to your point of view. -
-
-
-
-
80%
Charlson10 months, 1 week ago
Spadecaller, I participated on that post and after reviewing MY comments, I am ashamed at what I said while trying to debunk the spurious claims of the post and the intent of the poster. I will in the future endeavor to avoid commenting on these types of submissions - from the left or the right.
Reply
Too bad Propeller has ignored our requests to add a sink button to these submissions.-
75%
Spadecaller10 months, 1 week ago
Charlson
Reply
I agree and commend you for your humility in admitting that you (like me and others) can easily get swept into the inflammatory dialogue that these articles thrive on.
I prefer the sink button too, but that still doesn't offer a better substitute than refusing to participate, to vote, and to comment. These miserable stories have no power unless members give into them. -
68%
mntnman44410 months, 1 week ago
I don't apologize for anything,the people who post this smear are the lowest form of life and deserve to be treated as such.Propeller could be such a good place to have lively discussions but instead it is a daily obstacle course ,trying to step over the crap and find genuine debate on the candidates positions.I don't have anything against someone supporting their candidate or even criticizing the other candidate but when this kind of junk is daily front page material we have to put it and the person who posted it in their place.Some people say don't stoop to their level...I say if propeller won't do anything about it, I will,and I'll do it in the only language they understand.
Reply
AlphaGnosis IS Luvmyprez,who was already booted for the same kind of crap she is repeating now,except now it seems she is James's little darling,she posts smear and then reports anyone who speaks to her in the way a smearmonger should be treated.
-
-
95%
ind0610 months, 1 week ago
Well, I did my best to do honest research on the Obama's Mother thread but it seemed mostly to be ignored. To be fair, it was at the bottom of a VERY long thread and I haven't been able to look at threads after they get past 300 comments or so, so not long after I put up my last post, that comment string went blank on me...
Reply
Plus, it took me all morning to debunk the equivalent of "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
So, even though I personally feel good about clearing a few names I doubt I changed any minds about the truthfulness of that post, or even if such articles should be posted in the future...
I could add vis-a-vis the sink button that it was never a way to do anything but voice your dislike of a post without actually bothering to formulate an intelligent opinion and was used far too often because people didn't like the poster rather than anything to do with the post. Good riddance to it.
Also, any comment you make on a post helps it's "score" go up so ignoring a story you hate may be the best route with the current system. -
94%
ind0610 months, 1 week ago
Well, I did my best to do honest research on the Obama's Mother thread but it seemed mostly to be ignored. To be fair, it was at the bottom of a VERY long thread and I haven't been able to look at threads after they get past 300 comments or so, so not long after I put up my last post, that comment string went blank on me...
Reply
Plus, it took me all morning to debunk the equivalent of "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
So, even though I personally feel good about clearing a few names I doubt I changed any minds about the truthfulness of that post, or even if such articles should be posted in the future... -
-
-
-
-
92%
ind0610 months, 1 week ago
it's because they stopped limiting stories to two per category, and this is why they did it in the first place, you get a front page, or "newspaper" that is 90% political opinion and almost nothing else.
Reply -
-
-
95%
SenorCoconut10 months, 1 week ago
Unfortunately with Propeller's new algorithm, a story does not need many votes or comments to make it to the front page now, the main criteria seems to be page views, and all that's needed for that is a clever headline.
Reply -
91%
ameliog10 months, 1 week ago
There are many members who seemingly argue almost for the enjoyment of it. These people seek out these sorts of stories just to get into it with an opponent. A vote and comment gets these things seen, so our individual control over content comes down to ignoring what we don't want to see. I feel no obligation to read any stories on this site, and tend to go with trusted sources, although what is "trusted" varies widely for each of us.
Reply-
93%
ind0610 months, 1 week ago
I agree ameliog, I already tend to ignore that kind of thing, though I am occasionally sucked in, it hasn't had any effect.
Reply
However, Senor Coconut, I believe the most important part of the new algorithm is still votes. Since we would need people from all sides of the political spectrum on this string agreeing to not vote for such posts, and we don't have that, they'll surely keep showing up.
-
-
mackiemesserComment removed: User banned.
-
-
71%
Spadecaller10 months, 1 week ago
Me too. I have to now see who and what I had blocked before... and now I remember why! LOL!
Reply -
-
-
-
ClockworkorangeComment removed: User banned.5 Replies
-
-
78%
Spadecaller10 months, 1 week ago
Mdiar:
Reply
Unfortunately under the current system, even the most egregious content can easily make front page.
-
-
-
72%
crespi10 months, 1 week ago
A black man running for office really brings out the racist in Americans, doesn't it?
Reply
At least we don't have to hear how there ISN'T ANY racism in America anymore (always said by white guys.)
Propeller illuminates the ooze from the creeps by offering an open forum racists just can't help themselves from posting on.-
-
0%
Endoscopy10 months, 1 week ago
This is a response to Beau7890 above. Propeller strikes again.
Reply
I have posted many time about his policies that I get from his own web site. He has the Johnson spending, Carter economic, and Clinton taxing policies. That makes him a typical old school tax and spend Democrat.
A major problem when looking at all the spending programs (go to his web site) is that the taxes he proposes (go to his web site) will never pay for them. Even if he did a tax of 100% on that top 5% there is not enough money.
He foolishly believes like most liberals the opposite of what Kennedy knew and experience has taught us since then. Increasing taxes lowers revenue from them. Lowering taxes increases revenue from them. Liberals never look at how people change their behavior when giving or taking money by the government is done. -
-
-
-
-
71%
miklkit10 months, 1 week ago
Those threads are irritating for sure. I try to avoid them, but am not always successful. I have not propped, read, or commented on some; but just done some serial negging. Some of you may have noticed that they do that also.
Reply
I believe they use the Jerry Springer strategy because they can't debate the facts. -
85%
Formidable10 months, 1 week ago
Life affords us many checks and balances. The freedom of speech can be checked with the freedom of choice. If you chose to ignore a thread and/or a certain member the algorithm will not digitally promote derisive and sensational stories into prominence. However, if one mounts their Don Quixote steed and gallops off to enter the battle of negs and insults, they guarantee victory to that they abhor. The sword of choice; choosing not to read, comment and/or prop is most certainly a terminal weapon. While it does not gain you your moment of fame in print, it denies drivel the notoriety it seeks. James is not a hall monitor. Exercise your freedom of choice. You might be pleasantly surprised.
Reply -
-
71%
Will131310 months, 1 week ago
http://www.propeller.com/story/2008/08/25/snopescom-barack-obamas-mother/
Reply
there is NO WAY this story got over 5791 legimate reads....
only Propped.. 72 times.... yet remained on the front page.. AT THE TOP for several hours....
I've stuck around here .... but if this is going to sink to the level of other network sites.. some of them are easier at this time to navigate.. and don't seem to censor anything let alone LOLOL... -
-
PsychoHosebeastComment removed: User banned.
-
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.