« Back to story "Iraq: U.S. Sought Troop Presence To 2015"

Comments for Iraq: U.S. Sought Troop Presence To 2015 »

Posted By TimALoftis 1 year, 3 months ago in News

BAGHDAD - The United States asked Iraq for permission to keep its troops there to 2015, but U.S. and Iraqi negotiators agreed to limit their authorization to 2011, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said. "It was a U.S. proposal for the date which is 2015, and an Iraqi one which is 2010, then we agreed to make it 2011.

Read Full Story at msnbc.msn.com »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 20
- Display
  • 100%
    TimALoftis1 year, 3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    lets see...2011 vs. 2015 - 4 extra years @ a cost of $10 Billion per month...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      Lurch1 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      luckily the unfunded spending program the Bushies call the Iraq War is off the budget, so none of that counts. luckily.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
  • 100%
    jordan111 year, 3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Oh I see, the 'compromise' makes it look like the Iraqi's are calling the shots, & three more years looks good when compared to seven more years, & sort of makes you forget the cost of three more years not to mention asking for the rationale. Sort of like running gasoline up to over $4.00 a gallon, getting everyone upset, then dropping it juuuuust enough to make it look palatable in comparison, even though it's double 8 years ago. Quite the little game players, these CONS.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      miklkit1 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Well, it's a start. Is that a silver lining?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        Charlson1 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Is there a silver lining on body bags? And who's pockets is the silver in?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Goppy1 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        You know, the Iraq conflict is a central cog in the Military Industrial Complex' plan.

        They were DESPERATE to forego the so called PEACE DIVIDEND that Reagan touted as a result of the fall of the Soviet Union. There was a lot of pressure coming to bear upon them to explain why the Peace Dividend was not materializing.

        George W. Bush, **** Cheney, and Donnie Rumsfeld ... Neo-Cons all ... devoted themselves to protecting this vast money sucking machine.

        The Republican party has sadly evolved to be the party that cares little about our security .... or our soldiers .... but only spending an ever increasing quota of our tax dollars.

        Just think ... we spend more on the Military than ALL OTHER NATIONS OF THE WORLD COMBINED!!!!

        And that doesn't even count the Iraq and Afghanistan war!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          CHAM1 year, 3 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          You got it Goppy> And wasn't this war to liberate the Iraqi's? I think we've liberated more than a million of them-forever. And there's those four million who have left the country.

          No telling how many have been injured permanently. But not to fear the DU will keep getting them for the next 1/2 billion years.

          And don't I remember der Bush saying all they have to do is tell us to leave and we'll get out? The was two or three years ago. I do believe they've asked us several times since then. We're still there.

          And there's that little matter of Oil. We haven't got control of all of it yet. As Bush said a couple of years ago. We can't go and leave all that oil to the terrorists. I'm not sure he meant Iraqi's or some others. Hey, he might not even know.

          I heard McCain was looking for Iraq - somewhere up there between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Maybe he thought it was between Kashmir and China?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
        • 100%
          MeanMotherUSA1 year, 3 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          8-27-08...Over 30 Countries Now Have Oil Packs $$ With IRAQ,i.e. US.Gov (El Presidente Bushsh*t) Is Simply Protecting (Covering) Their As*es...

          MeanMotherUSA

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            trez_501 year, 3 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            I hear you!

            Lot of folks feel the same frustration.

            There was a huge protest in Denver. Thousands protested the war outside the Democratic National Convention Wednesday. Chanting slogans... demanding U.S. troops out of Iraq.

            www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26429975/

            "Thousands stage anti-war protest at convention"

            It's just a little too late.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              Lurch1 year, 3 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              The Iraqis never wanted us there to begin with, have wanted us out for years, and are kicking AQ`s arse just as badly in places where the surge did not happen as where it did happen.

              The only thing the surge did was get more GIs killed and wounded while costing us more. The Awakening has taken care of AQ where there was no surge, with no GI deaths.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                Tcaros1 year, 3 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Once we get that Bush bstard out of the White House we'll get those troops home. It may take several months, but then we can start the long road of recovery.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • 100%
                  slate1 year, 3 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Iraq has the right to decide when they will be able to take over IMO. It would be nice if they said they were ready now. I also hope they will help pay the large costs in money that has been spent in the process,

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                  Reply
                  loading loading ...
                  • 100%
                    rightfromwrong1 year, 3 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    U will find that when they pull out, they have left behind at least 50,000 troops like in Saudi Arabia. Don't forget that they went their for the oil so the 150,000 Blackwater mercenaries will still be there which of course will cost another 20B/yr. All funneling up to our buddy Cheney

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...
                    • 100%
                      heresusie1 year, 3 months ago

                      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                      That's long time. I'd like to see what will be after the end of election.

                      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                      Reply
                      loading loading ...
                      • Neutral
                        vor1 year, 3 months ago

                        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                        By the neocon belief we would never leave. Giving a date of 2015 is a canard to attempt an open ended presence. If McCain wins in November is he really going to agree to close the "permanent" bases we built way back at the beginning of the invasion? Not necessarily McCain but his neocon advisors? That would not fit their global strategy at all. And neocons don't change, don't compromise. The military advances we have made in Iraq came despite these people not because of them (give Petraeus real credit here). If they had their way we never would have talked to the Sunni Tribal leaders or indirectly to the Shia Militias. They call that "appeasement". All the more reson change must come to the White House.

                        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                        Reply

                        3 Replies

                        loading loading ...
                        • Neutral
                          slate1 year, 3 months ago

                          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                          Quit Whinning, Obama will save the day won't he? WIll you be against Obama if he leaves any troops at all in the region? You know, he'll be in charge if he wins, so in the end if any troops are left there beyond his term that will be his fault, not Bush's

                          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                          Reply

                          2 Replies

                          loading loading ...
                          • Neutral
                            vor1 year, 3 months ago

                            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                            That's whining, you fool! And thats your specialty. Obama can't do this or that! WAHHHH! He will do what is necessary. Again, you are simply afraid of a President wiser than you.

                            Obama will make a fine President. You don't even understand the simple argument I put forth. Not unexpected. I give Petraeus credit and that is whining? The neocons are idiots but of course that is the mentality you relate to!

                            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                            Reply

                            1 Reply

                            loading loading ...
                            • Neutral
                              slate1 year, 3 months ago

                              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                              WOw the english major knows how to spell fool, how sweet.

                              I sure hope he's wiser than I am or you VOR if he's going to be president.

                              "By the neocon belief we would never leave. Giving a date of 2015 is a canard to attempt an open ended presence.'

                              I read what you wrote and understood it well.

                              Lighten up, you know it only takes about 2-3 brain cells to insult someone, you may want to use them for more productive things, like having your hand wipe the foam from around your mouth..

                              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                              Reply
                              loading loading ...

                        Add a Comment

                        Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                        Forgot your password?

                        Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                        To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.