Story Comments
Posted by: protoham 1 year, 3 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

protoham1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Guess what, if the armed forces are home, sitting on their hands, it will still cost 12B a month. Also did you not hear the statement that he was going to strengthen the Military, that is a code word for DRAFT. I am well over the draft age, but maybe you aren't. Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it.
Reply
If you were not around during the Vietnam war, you have no idea how bad it can get. It is one thing to volunteer to be a warrior, it is another to be forced.
Here is the DOD Budget under Clinton during peace time $246 Billion, if you adjust for inflation it should be twice that today:
http://www.dod.mil/execsec/adr95/budget_5.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2005/d20050207b...
Year 2006 419.3B If you notice the budget in 2006 is less than twice the 1996 budget.
Before you spend your money, try one more experiment: Divide 12 Billion by the population of 330 Million. How far do you think your $36.36 will go.-

Charlson1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Also did you not hear the statement that he was going to strengthen the Military, that is a code word for DRAFT."
Reply
Another example of putting YOUR TAKE on what he said. Code? And how would you know? And if he's going to withdrawal our troops responsibly, why would we need a draft.
Hey, I was there during the Vietnam War. My draft number was 136 and I was drafted. So I know how bad it was. But why do you think Obama would implement a draft when he's said time, and time again, that he'd negotiate first and use the military option as a last resort? You continue to misinform and spread specious statement in hopes you sound intelligent and know what you're talking about. But you are clueless. And the $12 million a month is what we are spending in Iraq not the military as a whole. Borrow, borrow, borrow to pay for Bush's war...you just don't get it and probably never will. -

Lurch1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
> Year 2006 419.3B If you notice the budget in 2006 is less than twice the 1996 budget.
Reply
Protoham, you are only barely scratching the surface of the cost of the military in 2006. The entitlements to Halliburton and massive corruption of the the so-called reconstruction, the x-fold increase in costs to care for physically and mentally injured, and the cost of the war itself. None of this is in your link.
Total costs of Bush`s war expected to reach $3T if we quit now.
-
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (10)
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.