Story Comments
Posted by: Georgia50 1 year, 3 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
0%
Georgia501 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What did Clinton's use of Jimmy Carter's experience get us in North Korea?
Reply
You Democrats have already proven how dangerous "experience" can be when it's detached from reality.
And the argument McCain makes is intact inasmuch as Palin has had to make--as governor--executive decisions that would make or break her as a state politician. She currently enjoys a positive rating among Alaskans well North of 80%. However, I think focus on experience is unhealthy for both ticketc. Focus on the negative is likewise not going to serve either party well.
Obama and McCain need to focus on presenting themselves and their policies to the American people. We're not stupid...we can make the decision that we believe is best for the country.-
-
100%
NoWayMan1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
and bush had plenty of "executive experience" going in.
Reply
exec experience obviously don't mean squat. that line already doesn't work when faced with the reality of the bush administration.
the cons will have to come up with something new. which is not their forte.-
0%
Georgia501 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Clinton was an executive and he had a chance to put Osama away and chose not to.If he had we would not have had a 9/11 and would not have had to send our troops to fight for our country. Wake up people. Your right executive experience in itself does not work. It is the way you govern that matters. Sarah Palin has done more in her short stay in office than Obama/Biden has done combined. As Bill Clinton says best, You have candidate x (Obama) that believes everything that you do and candidate y (Mccain) that only believe in half but your don;t believe x Obama will do anything and you believe y mccain will. Who do you vote for. Let me see, one that won;t do anything or one that will? I vote for mccain/palin
Reply-
100%
hyperbola1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Sounding more desperate by the minute Georgia.
Reply
Alaskan republicans just chose a corrupt doddering old fool (Ted Stevens) again - pretty much shows their incompetence. As for Palin, she was in over her head as mayor of a town of 5000 and is clearly in over head as governor of a state with 700,000 people.
So Many Republican Hypocrites, So Little Time
Alaskan Republicans voting for Ted Stevens
Your U.S. Senator is under indictment for corruption. He has shown signs of a lack of understanding of the 21st Century. And he's been around for a long time, and is older than John McCain by 13 years.
So you have a primary with a chance to substitute someone else in your party to run in a tight battle in November. And what do you do?
....
You had a shot at putting democracy and even party ahead of corruption, and you failed. So we proudly give to the 63% of Republicans who voted for Ted Stevens this week the GOP Hypocrite of the Week award.
http://gophypocrites.com/2008/08/hyp08035.html
-
-
-
-
loading ...
People Who Liked This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?
mesodude
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.