« Back to story "Ad Featuring Ted Stevens Endorsing Sarah Palin Removed from Her Website"

Story Comments

Posted by: bluetexasvalley 1 year, 3 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

100%
bluetexasvalley1 year, 3 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

But she is female, supposed to get him the Hillary vote, and she is a creationist and pro-life, which should draw the fundies.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
4 Replies

loading ...
- 100%
  Dobes_Rule1 year, 3 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Good Morning btv! I just have one correction (IMHO) to make to your statement above - you used the term "pro life", which is so inaccurate - they are "anit-abortion" - period. "Pro-life" in and of itself does not include bombing abortion clinics, murdering doctors, sending our men & women (boys and girls in many cases) off to die in a needless invasion of Iraq! Pro-life my azzzz.
  
  Oh, and I cannot imagine her getting the female Democrat vote - not from this gal or anyone else I know!
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - 100%
    bluetexasvalley1 year, 3 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    You're so right, Dobes Rule. I stand corrected. In fact she is against abortion even in cases where the mother's life is in danger or where the pregnancy is the result of rape.
    
    BTW, I just finished making some really good submissions. Be sure to check in your Friends Submissions.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    1 Reply
    
    loading ...
    - 100%
      Dobes_Rule1 year, 3 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      I've already read the Tokenism article - excellent! Keep up the great submissions!!
      
      Thanks ~ Dobes
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...
  - 100%
    Janeyre1 year, 3 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    Dobes_Rule, some interesting comments you made. Thanks...
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    0 Replies
    
    loading ...