Foreign Policy and National Security Are Not the Same Thing »

Posted By populist 10 months, 1 week ago in News

1 of 1

Granted that the history of US foreign policy in the world has been heavily larded with wars, many of them at America's instigation. It is nonetheless true that foreign policy is much bigger and more far reaching than just what has come to be known as "national security" issues.

In Bush-speak, national security has come to mean having big guns, lots of heavily armed troops, cruise missiles, nuclear weapons, naval armadas and a bully's willingness to use these weapons on a whim, with no thought of consequences.

Read Full Story at populistamerica.com »

1221 Views Share Story 26 Comments Report

Submitted By:
populist

The essays we offer are unapologetically presented for you to read & analyze. Many are offered as a similar view to ours & others simply to invite ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 65 (view all)
  • 100%
    populist10 months, 1 week ago

    Reminds me a little of Thomas Jefferson:

    "Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none."

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    not2needy10 months, 1 week ago

    When will people stop, think, and reason this out? What does it take?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    jovial10 months, 1 week ago

    In the sea of politics, quick soundbites like the 3am phone call, win votes. Most people don't have time to think about the issues seriously. But then that's why we are here. Good story.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    9 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    Spadecaller10 months, 1 week ago

    Unfortunately and fortunately, some people learn after they are hit across the head with a two by four. Americans who stand by silently and support or ignore the improper use of our military on behalf of a few profiteers and corporate dictators will reconsider their apathy or misguided support AFTER they lose their house and job.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    Mdiar10 months, 1 week ago

    You know, I think we should consider following the Washington doctrine. Aspects of Truman's had its strengths... particularly the idea that you help countries that need it to create stronger allies, but that can just lead to eventual war. Washington's, on the other hand, is rather straightforward.

    Bush's is just strange to me. Well, Bush Jr.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    quackpot10 months, 1 week ago

    The Bush Administration has treated foreign policy with all of the finesse of a pig in a sty at feeding time.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      dandt161210 months, 1 week ago

      Good article. Thx populist.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        PainGoddess10 months, 1 week ago

        Trying to hug the world while kicking it in the N**** is not good.....

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        cowboygrandpa10 months, 1 week ago

        When foreign policy is like work place policy. Nobody wins.

        In the workplace it is all for the employer and who cares about the workers they can be replaced. Corporations are now finding out that this has been foolish from the beginning.

        Take a look at the shifting wealth and power base in the world. Yes employees need to produce but they also need to enjoy the fruits of their labor.

        I learned from a wise businessman years ago. The best deal is when both parties think they got the best end of the deal.

        That is what foreign diplomacy should be like. Threats only need to be used in extremely dire circumstances.

        Repeated empty threats and acts of war only increase hostility and protectionism. Truly building a better global community decreases such acts and increases good neighbors. Who watch out for each others interests and wellbeing because it is in their best interest to do so.

        Just like an employee who feels secure and productive, will produce better work. Nations who feel included will strive to increase their role in being a part of a respectful global neighbor.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        4 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        rightfromwrong10 months, 1 week ago

        On the world stage, Bush should be charged with "war crimes". I hope the Bugliosi is successful in getting him into court on at least the murder of 4,000 U.S. soldiers.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        4 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 0%
        canadianrancher5710 months, 1 week ago

        Good artical, or so I thought .The problem is people have so many things that affect their ability to make decisions that most don't stop to look at anything. We chose people to run the country because they appear to be sucsessful and yet many of them are are just puppets who are marketed to us as are the policies that they promote. the Democratic system that we believe is the best system out there has been hijacked by capitalism. True capitalism cares nothing of people but only about greed and money and as we have seen the people who have been running you country for awhile will ally with any party to achieve the goal.
        I am at a loss for the solution of how the people of your country and mine will regain the power the belongs to the people, for as it stated in the artical about the teachers in China most people are ambassadors of good will not of war or greed.
        What I fear for the future of the American people is that the greed of those who control your country will lead to a very violent solution from either within your country ot by the nations of the world who will eventually tire of this game of power and war. The latest show of stupidity is the placement of radar systems in Poland which has beeen done to protect American interests, or is it just to cause a new start to the cold war.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        pongping10 months, 1 week ago

        The headline says it all.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          CHAM10 months, 1 week ago

          ML2007. I agree that Obama is the choice over McCain, but that should only be a first step. The most important thing at the moment is to stop the Neo-Con take over of our country. They are very close to gaining complete control. Their business is dominance. And they sell protection. The old gangster style protection. Sign up and pay or bad things begin to happen to you.

          Their vehicle of operation is mainly the Republican Party. This organization gives them cover all in the name of God and Country. Seems like the Democratic Party is desperately wanting to get on the bandwagon so they can get the major share of that booty.

          Neither Party has your or my interests as a priority. But booting one out at least is a start. Once out they should never be let back in. They've had their chance and they have blown it.

          We desperately need to develop a viable third option and a forth if necessary. In the meantime if we happen to get a moral and ethical leader, lets hope Obama, then we have to insist that we will not allow an immoral and unethical official to remain in office, and if that official's party tries to protect his malfeasance, we need to send that party to join the Republicans in the never again future.

          We have to be more powerful than those who would usurp power.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • 0%
          AntiNeoCon9 months, 3 weeks ago

          Great article, thanks for sharing.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (depth : 1) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          View All 65 Comments

          Add a Comment

          Sign In With Your Propeller Account

          Forgot your password?

          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

          More News

          Advertisement