« Back to story "Palin's Speech vs. Reality"

Story Comments

Posted by: Klarissa 1 year, 3 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

20%
Klarissa1 year, 3 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

mnt - she is not and never has been a friend:

Anne Kilkenny (Not employed/Homemaker), (Zip code: 43220) $250 to OBAMA FOR AMERICA on 03/19/08

http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T3BS93...
Anne Kilkenny, an Obama supporter, currently running for office.......and it appears Mrs Kilkenny has a personal issue with Governor Palin of course the likes of Daily KOS & Huff are still digging as I guess they do not feel Governor Palin has been properly veted yet but think it just fine their candidate of choice has gotten a free pass on everything but his standard fare " he is not the __________ I used to know"

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
3 Replies

loading ...
- 100%
  Candida1 year, 3 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Klarissa: "Anne Kilkenny, an Obama supporter, currently running for office.......and it appears Mrs Kilkenny has a personal issue with Governor Palin"
  
  This may all be true, but the question is whether she has stated anything about Sarah Palin that it not true. Can you point to anything that it untrue?
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  2 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - 90%
    CaptainLucid1 year, 3 months ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    If only the dem leadership would start using this tactic. W and his party have made blaming the messenger a core strategy. And if that doesn't work start talking about a Clinton. At the end the questioner should just ask "so which one of the statements are not true" and stick to that until the neocon if forced to answer or has security make the person go away. If you look back as soon as McClellen had his book the rep leaders sent out a talking point that told everyone in the party leadership and at faux news that McClellen wrote it for the money. Not one of them ever mentioned anything about what was in the book or whether it was true or false.
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    1 Reply
    
    loading ...
    - 80%
      Bruedaddy1 year, 3 months ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      yes, that would mean ****y little neocons would have to CARE about the truth.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      0 Replies
      
      loading ...