Story Comments
Posted by: AntiNeoCon 1 year, 2 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
29%
AntiNeoCon1 year, 2 months ago
-
88%
busterggi1 year, 2 months ago
-
-
-
ProudBlueTexanComment removed: Spam
-
-
100%
Lurch1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It has been illegal to destroy e-mails or any other govt documentation unless for national security means for over a decade. By law the e-mails have to be backed up.
Reply
But the Bushies deleted millions of e-mails, both originals and backups.
Why reward this kind of behavior with four more years?
-
-
-
100%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I guess if you have to investigate something they were involved in yes that would make sense. However as usual the REPUBLICANS here seem to want to divert attention. SO it has to be assumed shes hiding something since the emails were asked for as part of an investigation into corruption and malfeasance BY PALIN.
Reply -
-
-
63%
Blackacereturn1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
They are private until you are being investigated then they are public property. She should release them at once! But I am sure they are doing their best to delete the evidence that she was behind the firing of her brother in law! And the other guy before they release them!
Reply-
0%
nlknlk74421 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Have you looked at the brotherinlaw's record. If he had not been given improper passes by his superiors he would have been caned long ago. He drove the state cruiser drunk and was cought. Under the table it went. His superior should have been caned for the cover up.
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
-
91%
Dionys1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"I certainly am not a Palin fan, but hey...email is personal and private so why should anyone be able to look at it?"
Reply
They're state governmental records and as such are part of the Public Record.
I'm guessing they'll be 'lost' like the millions of emails the White House 'lost' surrounding the dates of investigations.-
93%
italymeetsdixie1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Her personal email, from her personal account should remain private. But what she does while she is a tax-payer-funded office, on a tax-payer-funded computer, using tax-payer funded computers and servers, should be disclosed to the tax payers.
Reply
If they were a matter of national security, that's one thing, but somehow I doubt that is the case.-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
Neutral
Dionys1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
If it were a matter of national security, she shouldn't have been using Yahoo mail (to obviously keep control over her public email records) and she shouldn't have been copying emails to her husband who's not even any sort of public employee.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
altruisms-enemyComment removed: Hard Banned2 Replies
-
93%
hyperbola1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Actually Palin has a record of using municipal and government infrastructure, including computers, to support GOP political campaigns. Indeed, Palin's Attorney General recently came up with the novel idea that the use of state resources by "state employees" (read political appointees) should not be subject to investigation for wrongdoing. One more example of abuse of political power.
Reply-
-
-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
-
-
100%
dunkirk1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Simple just like when you work for a company any private emails that you send are open to the company to examine. Your using their equipment. The same applies here she was sending emails using government equipment, it should be open for viewing., especially in cases of wrongdoing. As the REPUBLICANS loved to say, whats she got to hide?
Reply -
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
100%
georgii11 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Email written on the job is not private. If she was on the job, using puplic equipment, and accessing a public provided server; it's not private e-mail anymore. If I want it private I definitely would not send it through a work place service and at every job I've held at some point you are given notice that your e-mail are the company's property. Now, if she's writing and sending though a government service then they are actually the publics.
Reply -
-
0%
Bradgrp1 year, 2 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Not when you're a public official. Any and everything that a public official does is "public" with a few exceptions. This is the continuation of the Bush Administration through and through. This nation is on the brink of collapse and we are a presidency away from an international incident. We won't have any allies in this world if Mccain/Palin is elected. Mccain is senile and inept.
Reply
-
loading ...
Patience
normallysilent
protoham
gwhiddon
TGrass3001
gamahuche
Dionys
Progressive
styxnut
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.