New Statesman - Who scrubbed Palin clean? »
Posted By Radiofreeeuropa 1 year, 3 months ago in NewsThe Wikipedia entry of Republican vice-presidential hopeful Sarah Palin was mysteriously scrubbed clean in the hours before John McCain revealed his running mate.
Read Full Story at newstatesman.com »
4233 Views Share Story 33 Comments Report
Submitted By:
Radiofreeeuropa
All progress comes from unreasonable people.
Rats live on no evil star!
Wasilla: All I saw...
Sorry, just palindroming around with terrorists.
Are you still ...
Who Also Submitted: All »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentShowing 67 of 69 Comments (view all)
-
89%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This wasn't just wikipedia, which is fairly easy to manipulate, it was sites all over the internet.
Reply
Even sites that lean pro democratic. I noticed particularly all connections with Stevens and the bridge to nowhere money that was spent on a road to nowhere disappeared.-
-
100%
Dionys1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Don't forget all the missing transcripts, videos and audio files of sermons given at her church, speeches she's made and especially the ones that talked about infiltrating the government within the existing parties to bring Christian evangelical rule to the US.
Reply
The True Manchurian Candidate.
-
-
-
88%
Radiofreeeuropa1 year, 3 months ago
-
100%
epiphannyy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Track changes to any website at http://versionista.com/
Reply -
80%
not2needy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wonder how much it cost republicans to scrub her squeaky clean?
Reply
After spending millions on the Bill Clinton sex investigation, there seems to be no limits on what they will spend to get what they want. I guess the end justifys the means, but what is the payout in the end is what i would like to know. -
82%
Charlson1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This explains the claims that McCain and Palin are continuing to make on the campaign trial and an interview embargo with Palin since the RNC. The handlers don't want Palin to say anything that would be contradicted by info on the internet. That is, until they've had a chance to sanitize the embarrassing information.
Reply-
75%
not2needy1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
It was really a stupid move on their part, they should have done all that before they announced her as the running mate. Now that there's so much attention on her, and things that were there yesterday are gone today, doesn't look very Kosher!
Reply
-
-
-
-
11%
krp02001 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
WHY I'VE DECIDED TO VOTE DEMOCRATIC
Reply
I'm voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
I'm voting Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.
I'm voting Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust that the bad guys will stop what they're doing because they now think we're good people.
I'm voting Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday CAN tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.
I'm voting Democrat because I'm not concerned about the slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
I'm voting Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the
government for redistribution as THEY see fit.
I'm voting Democrat because I believe three or four pointy headed elitist liberals need to rewri te the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would NEVER get their agendas past the voters.
I'm voting Democrat because I believe that when the terrorists don't have to hide from us over there, they will come over here, and I don't want to have any guns in the house to shoot them with.
(My favorite): I'm voting Democrat because I love the fact that I can now marry whatever I want. I've decided to marry my horse.
I'm voting Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.
* * * * *
Makes ya wonder why anyone would EVER vote Republican, now doesn't ?-
Jennyreen1Comment removed: Spam
-
-
100%
miklkit1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Why I'm voting republicon.
Reply
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e2d3a8677a -
-
-
-
100%
lfergie8121 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Copy cat. That idea was already used as reasons to vote Republican.
Reply
"I'm voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would. "
Republicans have been the biggest spenders for the last 28 years.(Reagan Bush and Bush) Every time they leave office the deficit is larger than when they took office.
"I'm voting Democrat because I believe three or four pointy headed elitist liberals need to rewri te the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would NEVER get their agendas past the voters."
That's laughable. It's Republicans that are always talking about amending the Constitution.
"(My favorite): I'm voting Democrat because I love the fact that I can now marry whatever I want. I've decided to marry my horse."
Fine choice. I believe you would make a good horses ass.
"I'm voting Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't."
Now here is where the propaganda comes in. The oil companies are making record billions in profit and they claim to make only 4%. They possibly make 4% on refining but over all they are making much more than 4%. The only ones that are happy with the oil companies profits are the oil companies and their employees.
-
-
Jennyreen1Comment removed: Spam
-
Jennyreen1Comment removed: Spam
-
Jennyreen1Comment removed: Spam
-
Jennyreen1Comment removed: Spam
-
sailrComment removed: Retracted by user
-
Jennyreen1Comment removed: Spam
-
Jennyreen1Comment removed: Spam
-
71%
mleedenton1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Scru all you want dumb Republicans the truth will come out. Shes a sad excuse for a mother and wife. She had an affair she should be fried on it. Her husband is an idiot. Her daughter has been ignored by her thats why shes pregnant. McCain is an idiot also. Has anyone mentioned he was admonished by the Senate for his involvement with Charles Keating. They ripped off several old people for their savings on several phony realty scemes and he should have spent time in prison like Charley did for it.
Reply-
20%
BB641 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
First, she's actually a pretty good mom from all accounts. Her children travel a good part of the time with her and are well taken care of by both parents. Yes, I know according to your doxology women don't need men. They should have jobs and careers over family. In this case the family unit seems to be working.
Reply
The article is about someone changing the Wiki sight. Most adults really use other reference sources and rarely go there. That is unless you're a college kid that doesn't really have the wear withal to do a proper back ground check. Though it sounds like an aide, I really don't care.
Here's a better idea. How about instead of creating news against Sarah or John, you guys show me why I should vote for Barrack and Joe. There must be some reason. After hearing the hope & change speech for the last 6 months, I was hoping to see the changes laid out on paper or perhaps a road map. Show me the hope & change.
-
-
-
ClockworkorangeComment removed: Abusive3 Replies
-
-
50%
Tangent0011 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Perchance because nothing in Obama's past is really that bad?
Reply
Perchance because perpetrating a cover-up is for liars, criminals, or the grievously unqualified?
I think they needn't have bothered. Nobody who supports this choice would do any homework anyway.
-
-
-
-
-
-
25%
irishluc1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I find it ironic that the liberal democrat speaks of love and giving of endless handouts, until you disagree with them or the handouts come from their own pocket. Then they become the tazmanian devil, rapid and stupid!!!!
Reply
Sarah Palin didn't need to be scrubbed clean because she bathes!!! I can't believe the childish, stupid crap that comes from your rainbow sweet souls. Every woman who is a woman, should kick your hero to the curb after his comment about "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig." He was obviously trying to mimic Sarah's great speech at convention since he doesn't have his own original thoughts, and flubbed big time!!-
TNTComment removed: Hard Banned
-
-
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.