« Back to story "Will Super Collider Cause Black Hole? - FAQ: Large Hadron Collider"

Comments for Will Super Collider Cause Black Hole? - FAQ: Large Hadron Collider »

Posted By pagey 1 year, 3 months ago in Science & Technology

Why are people without physics degrees counting down until the first proton beam travels the ring? Is it because the bad science of the machine's supposed doomsday potential traveled faster than quantum mechanics? Or because there's never been a more powerful mega-gadget like it?

Read Full Story at popularmechanics.com »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 11
- Display
  • 33%
    kritikit1 year, 3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    nice lets destroy the building blocks of life on earth... dumb asses... they built one in texas and stopped before they actually did a experiment.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      ind061 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      The Superconducting Super Collider to be built in Waxahatchie, Texas was indeed canceled in 1993, but not due to safety issues.
      In 1987 Congress was told the project would cost $4.4 billion, by 193 the cost had risen to over $12 billion. At the same time NASA was contributing a similar amount to the International Space Station. It was argued that the country could not afford both and the Superconducting Super Collider was canceled.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_Super...

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      pagey1 year, 3 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Safe as they say it is, I have concerns with something so powerful

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        ind061 year, 3 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        The Stanford Linear Accelerator was founded in 1962 and has been in use for approximately 30 years.
        The Bates Linear Accelerator at MIT has been in use since 1972.
        CERN's Large Electron-Positron Collider began running on the Franco-Swiss border in 1989.
        Really, this concern is entirely unwarranted.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Dionys1 year, 3 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          All those accelerators are like mice compared to this lion.

          There are plenty of well respected physicists and scientists with valid concerns over its operation.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
        • 0%
          Mutainia1 year, 3 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          I don't think I'll worry about it until someone says, "It's so safe, not even GOD can make it dangerous."

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 50%
            aceofspades11 year, 3 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            How come someone hasn't politicized this yet? all science seems to be determined by politics now

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 67%
              ningyo1 year, 3 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              the only thing the hadron does is to try and re-create whats happens thousands if not millions of times daily naturally in an environment where we can watch it---particles from space are constantly zipping through earth at near light speed and sometimes collide with atoms and spin off these little molecular storms--except its in the middle of the planet where we cant see what happens---you can sort see what happens in a vapor chamber but cant get any real data from the aftermath...yes... its hard to believe but at this moment interstellar particles are raining down on you and your cat...its one reason that magnetic tapes deteriorate over time...aside from being next the the refrigerator...so get out your tin foil hats and wait for the big bang from switzerland..this thing will likely spin off little black holes..thats a normal part of our earthly existence...but like most radioactive elements they only last millisecs---you can all relax now and back to bashing palin

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                Ratskii1 year, 3 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Well, the first hadron collider experiment(s) have occurred. One of two things has happened.

                1) the experiment was perfectly safe all along and we had no reason for concern.

                2) the universe (beginning with the earth) was destroyed and we just failed to notice.

                From what I've been reading about quantum physics lately, the second possibility can't be dismissed out of hand.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  decibelintent1 year, 3 months ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  We're all still alive, aren't we?

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  loading loading ...
                  • 100%
                    ind061 year, 3 months ago

                    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                    Or ARE we?

                    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                    Reply
                    loading loading ...

                  Add a Comment

                  Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                  Forgot your password?

                  Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                  To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.