Story Comments
Posted by: lovemylibs 1 year, 3 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
60%
lovemylibs1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think you are incorrect with your single sentence summarization. This explanation shows there are four main themes related to the Bush Doctrine:
Reply
http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/1202/ijpe/pj...
These four themes are:
1) Preemption
2) Military Primacy
3) Multilateralism
4) Spreading Democracy-
20%
lovemylibs1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Are you dense, donald? That is not a Bush website. That article was written by:
Reply
By Keir A. Lieber
Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Notre Dame
and
Robert J. Lieber
Professor of Government and Foreign Service, Georgetown University
Both professors at respected universities. They have credentials and everything.-
100%
Spinward1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That's just the problem.
Reply
The Bush Doctrine is up for debate.
It is LARGELY considered to be a right to preemptively strike if we feel an attack is imminent.
Now, I have an IQ of 148, am educated, and follow world events rather closely and, frankly, the question caught me off-guard. It's a pretty vague question. If Charlie were more fair, he would have said, "Do you degree in preemptive strikes against aggressor nations?" Then we could have heard her thoughts.
Just to make sure I was not being biased, I asked three people that work in our building, "What do you think of the Bush doctrine.. stop laughing. Ok, it's a bad question, but SERIOUSLY, what's your reply?"
1) I think it's great. Bush gets blamed for everything and I'm safe when I sleep at night, so whatever it is, it must be working.
2) It sucks. (why? - I asked) Because it violates the constitution and invades peoples privacy. I'm busy, so I'll see you later.
3) No idea. I just work here and I don't do anything else.
So, that she answered when he gave some idea what he was talking about, was fine. I would have said, "What are you referring to? I'm sure Bush has lots of beliefs, doctrines and principles." That answer would not make me an idiot. The question was a hunt for a gaffe, not a hunt for an answer. -
-
25%
lovemylibs1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Since you asked nicely:
Reply
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0IBR/is_1_3...
Go to the google, type in "Bush Doctrine four tenets" without the quotes and look at any of the 267,000 links.
-
-
-
-
miklkitComment removed: Spam
-
-
-
-
-
50%
tchef1 year, 3 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Changes like what? All they are doing is echoing current policy! Everything McCain says is something that Bush has already said. I we elect McCain and Palin all we will have is Bush's third term.
Reply
We are not just attacking Palin for the sake of attacking her. We are showing that she is not ready for the job. We are pointing out the problems with her. You guys have been "attacking" Obama since day one so you have not room to talk. He is much more qualified than she is.
Your boy Karl Rove said that Tim Kaine wasn't qualified for the VP and he is a two time Mayor of Richmond Virginia (about the same population as Alaska) and 4 years as Governor of Virginia. Explain to me how He isn't qualified and she is? She's only been Governor for a year and a half.
Go ahead I'm ready for the negs.
loading ...
Spinward
Patience
amazed
protoham
DaneL
beymudakov
gwhiddon
FairNBalanced
Ciera-Marie
Searchbeam
Mulder
Neophile
miklkit
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.