« Back to story "Pakistan order to kill US invaders"

Story Comments

Posted by: Grancher 1 year, 2 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 86%
    Grancher1 year, 2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I am rather curious as to what the US government is thinking pushing Pakistan like they are, perhaps they have a half dozen more wars planned, to make sure the war profiteers don't run out of money.
    But regarding Billy Graham, he is fairly famous around the world from what I can tell, at least in English speaking countries with sizable Christian populations.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    5 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      skeek1 year, 2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      "But regarding Billy Graham, he is fairly famous around the world from what I can tell, at least in English speaking countries with sizable Christian populations."

      When people say "around the world" they tend to refer only to the first world, and the western one at that. Break that down into its more accurate percentages and it rapidly becomes the minority. This world is, for the most part, not western, not first world, and not English-speaking.

      Pakistan is one such country. It is not English speaking, it is impoverished, and it has a sizable Muslim population.

      If you were to truly look into the many and varied cultures and traditions that exist in this world today, you would realise most of them are not represented by the sweeping generalisation, "around the world." You would also realise that American as a country, an empire, and a culture, is still unknown to many of them. Thus any efforts to homogenise the world in the image of America, with all the trappings of "freedom," "democracy," commercialism and modernity, is as much ludicrous as it is naive.

      It is these people, those who exist outside the narrow, shallow sweep of first world perception that are most often branded as "terrorists." Americans, in particular because it suits their country's imperial agenda, bandy about the term "terrorist" labelling all those who oppose them as such.

      But in truth, many of these so-called "terrorists" are not driven by ideology, the are just fighting to provide food, water and shelter for themselves and their families. These things comes in increasingly short supply when they are in the midst of a war they understand little or nothing of. All they know is that strange jets and bombs blew up their farms, destroyed their livestock, and killed their families.

      When American troops come waltzing through the desert sands, jungles or paddy fields they are as alien to them as creatures from another planet. These people do not know of America's geopolitical plans and its appetite for political expansion; many don't even know George Bush exists, much less who he is. Although are doing is fighting to stay alive. This is why, the more America continues its wars in others people's countries, invariably those of the third world, the more it will find more and more "terrorists" under every rock and behind every tree. And what is surprising only to them, is they weren't there the last time they looked.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      4 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        inverse1 year, 2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Perhaps our next president should lead us to fight the war against poverty, to help bring sufficient food, clean water , electricity to more than a billions of people that don't have access to them, to fight the war against ignorance to help bring clean energy and sustainable development to the world. This is probably the more efficient approach to spread democracy and fight terrorism.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        3 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 89%
          skeek1 year, 2 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          It would be a start although the belief that democracy must be spread still grates as it remains an imperial motivation; that is, the desire to indoctrinate and thus control. The impotency of America's three ring circus 'democracy,' its dirty pool pettiness, its suspect electoral rigging, its rampant nepotism and inclination towards oligarchy, and its legal lobbyist corruption and cronyism is in no way a shining example of anything that anyone would necessarily want to embrace.

          But what you are coming close to saying that I haven't yet said is that the War on Terror is actually the war between the rich and the poor of the world. As Peter Ustinov said, "Terrorism is the war of the poor, war is the terrorism of the rich."

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          2 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 86%
            Sabretooth1 year, 2 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Very well written Skeek, i hope it does not fall on deaf ears.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
            • Neutral
              Mutainia8 months, 1 week ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              I still stand by for what I said.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 9) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (6)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)